Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Firstly I apologise for what may be a really boring post, but we are just starting the process of getting quotes for a long awaited loft conversion. And I have just discovered the word Megaflow. Who knew plumbing could sound so exciting. Anyway, the company we like the most is saying they highly, highly recommend us doing away with our cold water tank and installing a Megaflow system instead. At a cost of ?5k + VAT. According to them the noise of the water tank refilling in the eves when someone goes to the toilet in the night will drive us insane, no matter how much soundproofing they put around it. In their words "just ask anyone who has done a loft and not done away with their water tank", so I am.


We have a newly installed condenser boiler (2 years old), the water pressure in the house is great, big hot water tank, plenty of hot water no matter how many taps are running at the same time, all lovely jubbly, so other than the noise of the tank filing up I am wondering if this is really money well spent.


Any advice most welcome.


And apologies it is rather dull and not about Waitrose, M&S Food, or PIcturehouse Cinemas


Thanks


Fred

The main reason most people change to a Megaflow is the loss of pressure issue if more than one hot water tap/shower is in use. If you're happy that your current boiler does a similar job I don't see why you would need to change it. I think the noise issue is a red herring, how often would someone actually go to the loo in the middle of the night?...

Couple of threads that might be of interest.


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?29,1189509,1191148#msg-1191148


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1149042,1188990#msg-1188990


As for noise this can largely be eliminated by using a Fluidmaster valve, or similar, rather than a traditional ballcock type. They are designed to be much quieter than traditional valves.

Our bedroom is a loft conversion - cheaply done before we bought the property . There is a large cold water tank in a cupboard ,no insulation .


we've never been bothered by the noise and i'm a light sleeper ,woken by foxes ,cats ,motor bikes etc

What red devil said.

Also, the 'noise' of water splashing into the tank can be reduced with a small polythene sheet attached so the water runs down it, I think some cistern mechanisms have a kind of polythene flat tube thingy for the water to run down through - with same effect.

?5k is mental IMO.

"We have a newly installed condenser boiler (2 years old), the water pressure in the house is great, big hot water tank, plenty of hot water no matter how many taps are running at the same time, all lovely jubbly, so other than the noise of the tank filing up I am wondering if this is really money well spent."


What RD & KK said. If you're lucky enough to have this then just move it and box it in allowing for access and should be fine. Like Jeremy I've never understood why large combi's are often deemed not suitable for a house, especially if they work great in a flat. The excuse I got was that you dont have a back up. ie if the combi fails there is no HW storage. But even with storage you'd soon deplete that.


We've got the full upgraded wider pipe from the street, big Valliant boiler and megaflow for pressure. It works well but we still run out of water if we have two baths in a row. Our neighbour (same size house) has an old combi that works a treat and still has decent pressure. Same net result but difference is he didn't spend ?6k.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...