Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi


I'm looking for some help - my boyfriend and I recently bought the leasehold of a basement flat in Lausanne Road and are trying to make some improvements, including creating a doorway through and slightly shortening some structural walls.


We have engaged a structural engineer who can see no issue with the proposed changes and has provided all the relevant drawings/calculations as well as confirmation that the changes will have no impact on the structural integrity of the house.


However, when we applied to Southwark Council for freeholder consent, they refused us permission to make these changes, citing as their reason (verbally - we have had no written response) that this would interfere with their obligation to provide housing to the council tenants living in the flat above.


There would be no impact on the flat above (beyond some noise from our flat - which we have discussed with them and they are fine with), so this does not strike me as particularly reasonable.


I will go back to them and ask for further clarification, but I wondered if anyone on here would be able to provide examples of situations in which Southwark Council (as freeholder) have provided consent for structural changes (particularly in situations where the property in questioned contained a number of seperate flats)?


Many thanks advance for your help.


Tessa

  • 5 months later...

Hi Tessa,

I know this was a little while ago but I'm after similar information from Southwark and I wondered whether you had had success since posting this? I am in the process of gaining consent from Southwark council as freeholders, for what sounds bigger plans including a small extension, would be most useful to find out if you gained consent eventually. I have been told that Southwark council can take up to 6 months to grant it. Thanks in advance, and do hope you managed to do your renovations.

Tom

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am sorry to  continue this, but I found your previous  comment about me very personal,  disturbing and upsetting, which was why I responded at length. I'm sorry it bored you. I try to stick to facts. I have investigated. You (and anyone else) can go into the "search" settings on here and  do a search on an author's name. So you can (I presume) find all my posts, including any which were  replying  to you. I can't imagine that they are in greater numbers than my replies to anyone else, but you can see for yourself. I guess you can probably also find examples of what you call my "usual sarcasm". I wasn't aware that l had a tendency to sarcasm, though I do find a lot of things funny.  There is no need to reply to this unless you actually find evidence in support of what you said. Sorry everybody else. I had to get it off my chest as I was lying awake last night worrying about it 😭
    • Roy Ayers RIP   https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/mar/06/roy-ayers-jazz-funk-pioneer-everybody-loves-the-sunshine-dies
    • The Section 20 is just notification of intention to carry out works.  You have the right to object, propose an alternative or find different contractors. If you are joint freeholders why is your co freeholder acting unilaterally?  What is your usual mechanism for making decisions?
    • Hello, Does anyone have any other recommendations? Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...