Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I know this is a tricky one to answer but would anyone know the ball park figure for a side return and loft extension?

SR is going to be about 25 square meters when finished - and only going out to side of house.

Loft will create two bedrooms and shower room.

I'm asking as we've had quotes from ?90k to ?175k, and I'd be interested to know which end of that scale is most realistic.

Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/48024-side-return-and-loft-extension/
Share on other sites

175 sounds over the top. we have had a few quotes for the same thing and reckon about 110 is a more realistic figure - but obviously each case/house is different and will throw up different issues. also we are only looking for a one bed/bath in the loft In the end we have decided not to do the side return - it's just too much cash for what you get and with the market a bit shaky there's a strong possibility you'd never see the money back. just my thoughts.


good luck

In my experience, for a side return on it's own you are looking at 60 for the build only and 100 in total when you add in new good spec kitchen, flooring, lighting, doors etc. All aspects can be done more cheaply but you risk the quality of the finish so if you have the budget then do it properly, we used Plus Rooms.


Loft conversions are a lot easier and you should prioritize a side return specialist as your builder.

We are currently looking at doing this and in the process of getting quotes however as we talk through what we want its easy to see how the spec adds thousands.


in terms of side extension we are looking at a similar design to http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-46134893.html


in terms of Loft we are looking at One bedroom, one study and separate shower room.



even still the spec within these structures can add thousands.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For me, it's get the builders to put the structure

> up and make it weatherproof then run with it from

> there doing what bits you can yourself / bringing

> tradesmen in.


There's probably something to be said for that approach. All too often the finish is rushed because the builders want to move onto the next job.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > For me, it's get the builders to put the

> structure

> > up and make it weatherproof then run with it

> from

> > there doing what bits you can yourself /

> bringing

> > tradesmen in.

>

> There's probably something to be said for that

> approach. All too often the finish is rushed

> because the builders want to move onto the next

> job.


In theory a good idea, but if there are problems going forward, it is nigh on impossible to get anyone to take responsibility, they always blame the other tradesmen.... We found this and ended up massively out of pocket and it cost twice as much to put right (this was even using a project manager who also passed the buck) - if we ever do work on a large scale again, we will use one firm to do everything...

if you can get the structure up, without having to worry about finishes, cabinet sizes etc. you can concentrate on that first phase with less distractions. Obviously there may be some items you need to have decided in front ie. if you're having underfloor drainage, where roughly the waste entry points will be.

mrcee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks, certainly some food for thought and I am

> leaning towards getting structure including

> flooring in place 1st.


If you know a bit about building fair enough - but if not I'd recommend you use a builder who project manages and provides all of the other services as part of the initial quote, electrics plumbing etc. then he is responsible for them being available at the time they are needed.

mrcee - the link you've put up is the exact thing we're after!

I think it would be reassuring to hear from someone who's done a similar side return and loft extension, who could confirm that total cost was actually ?xxx amount.

It seems a daunting prospect to set out on this build without knowing what the final figure will be, and only have an estimate.

eek!

  • 2 weeks later...

I've done a loft and side return (at the same time).


The pure building costs for the extension will be circa 40k plus VAT and for the loft 45k plus VAT. So around 100k including VAT. However, to that you need to add all of the following:


? Measurement survey, engineering drawings, Thamses water fees, building control fees and Planning / certificate of lawfulness fees: 3k

? Architect fees: 12% of build costs if they project manage the build as well so 12k

? New Kitchen- 5k to 50k depending on what you want (12k for midrange with appliances)

? New flooring costs for extension and rest of kitchen: 750 to 2,500 depending on what you want

? Underfloor heating (if you want it): 2k

? Moving boiler / changing heating system to cope with larger house: 2k-4k

? New kitchen electrical fittings for kitchen: 1k to skies the limit depending on if you want LV lights, fancy chandeliers, how many sockets you want and what kind of finishing (chrome, flush, etc)

? Bifold doors and Velux windows (if you want them)?2k to 10k depending on what you want

? Flooring costs for new bedrooms and bathrooms and stairs: 2k to 6k depending on what you want

? New Bathroom suite- 1k to skies the limit

? Do you want to add in a ground floor bathroom under the stairs? Add 2k for that.

? Redoing your garden which will be wrecked?can be thousands!


All in 150k assuming you do nothing else to the house would be fair budget if it?s a mid market finish. It can easily be much more if you have expensive tastes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is why the NFU are so unhappy that Clarkson is involved as it distracts from the issues for real farmers. Your assumption that all land is purchased as a tax dodge is a wide sweeping dog whistle generalisation and, I suspect, a long way from the truth but something to government would love for people to think. Again, read this: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62jdz61j3yo          
    • Anyone got any feedback on Transgender Awareness Week over the last week? I don't. And neither has my wife. And neither have my sisters. And neither has my mum, nor my daughter   x
    • It's an estate that they have been gifted. They may choose to earn a living from it, or to sell all, or part of it. In many cases, the land will only have been purchased as a way to avoid tax (as is the case for people like Clarkson, Dyson and other individuals with significant land holdings) and has little to do with farming at all. The idea that if I give you land worth £3m + tomorrow Rocks, it's not an massive windfall, but simply a necessary tool that you need to earn a living is silly. It's no different from someone inheriting any other estate where they would usually be required to pay 40% tax and settle up immediately.  If you're opposed to any tax on those inheriting multi-million pound estates - I would be interested in who you would like to place a greater tax burden upon? Or do you simply think we should watch public services collapse even further.
    • Because it's only a windfall if they sell it - until that time it is an asset - and in this case a working asset but, as far a the government is concerned a taxable asset. The farm is the tool that they use to earn a living - a living that they will be taxed on in the same way a nurse is - it's just to do their job they are now expected to pay extra tax for the privilege - just because the farm was passed to them. Or are you advocating nurses pay tax on the tools they are provided to do their job too? 😉  Now, if they sell the farm then yes, they should pay inheritance tax in the same way people who are left items of value from relatives are because they have realised the value and taken the asset as cash.  Our farming industry is built upon family business - generations of farmers from the same families working the land and this is an ideological attack and, like so many of Labour's policies, is aimed at a few rich farmers/farm owners (insert pensioners on Fuel Duty), but creates collateral damage for a whole load of other farmers who aren't rich (insert 50,000 pensioners now struggling in relative poverty due to Winter Fuel) and will have to sell land to fund it because, well, they are farmers who don't earn much at all doing a very tough job - the average wage of someone in agriculture is, according to the BBC around £500 a week and the national average is £671. Do you see the point now and why so many farmers are upset about this? It's another tax the many to get to the few. Maybe farmers should wear Donkey jackets rather than Barbour's and the government may look on them a little more favourably.... Some good background from the BBC on why farmers are fighting so hard. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62jdz61j3yo
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...