Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Privately tutor to prepare for reception entrance - is this necessary?! Do any four year olds need to be privately tutored to enter reception? Reception is mostly play based with phonics & beginning to read & write, I cant see the need for tutoring at this age? But then again my children were very happy in a state primary but I don't know much about the private sector, just think it seems very young to be privately tutoring..

I have friends who have children in Dulwich private schools from 4 onwards and they have never had private tuition.

They had a choice of 2 schools ( were offered both) and chose one where there is emphasis on learning through activities within classroom or after school classes/groups.

This may be a stupid question, but you do realise reception entry is 4+, not 5+? Important for two reasons -


1. That you apply at the correct time!

2. That means your LO is just three when they are assessed and so what the school is looking for is not absolute knowledge (ie. the sort of stuff you can tutor, although good luck with that at age three!), but rather whether they can sit still and listen; concentrate on a task for a long enough period of time; absorb information and then use it (eg. listen to a story then ask or answer a question about what they have heard).


Having recently gone through the whole school decision-making process that you're now going through, I know the stress you're feeling and the fact there's no way of knowing whether you're making the right decision for your child. But reading your and your wife's increasingly frantic posts about Alleyn's on here over the last week, I'm starting to feel like the best advice I or any other poster can give you is RELAX.


You say your child is not yet three. S/he is going to change and develop a lot between now and 4+ assessment time and then again between the assessments and actually starting school. It's impossible to know right now whether Alleyn's is the right school for them, but if you set them on a hot-housing path from the age of two because for YOU it MUST be Alleyn's, you could risk killing off their love of learning, irrespective of how academically able they are or aren't - not just because you can't possibly know at age two whether they're as gifted as you would like, but also because at two, they do their learning through play (for which Montessori is great) and not through tutoring.


Sorry that this is unlikely to be what you wanted to hear, but the short answer is that there is no silver bullet way of getting them in to Alleyn's. And in the meantime, your repeated posts on here looking for one were making me stressed for your child!

I think the reception assessments are looking more at personality, confidence and "teachability" than anything else, and I agree, it's not possible to pay a tutor to fill a 3 year old with those qualities. They are looking for children who will happily go off with a person they have never met before and spend an hour impressing that person. We did the Alleyn's 4+ assessment this year as it's one of the schools that's walking distance from us and didn't get in. For what it's worth, my son told me they asked him to draw a picture of himself, draw some shapes, write his name and do a puzzle. But given the ratio of applicants to places, any typical slightly shy and/or stroppy three year old who refuses to speak if they're not in the mood has no chance!


I agree with Parkrunner, it's a school with a very particular style - a reception teacher there told me they spend around 70% of their time sitting down doing lessons in reception which goes against a lot of research about the value of play at that age and really put me off.


(I also suspect that the vast majority of Alleyns parents don't live in East Dulwich and aren't on the EDF which would explain why you're not getting the answers you were hoping for!) Good luck, it is a very stressful decision and it's also a very strange adjustment I found - in most settings in adult life you are a consumer and can pay to get what you want, but with school entry, state or private, you suddenly become a supplicant with no power and it's very discombobulating. But once you come to terms with that and realise everyone's in the same boat it becomes less stressful. There are loads of great schools around here and your child will get into one of them.

We have a child who started at Alleyns last year in Reception. We are in ED (not clapham, battersea etc) and a number of the other kids also live nearby. We are very happy with the early years provision which includes plenty of running around time, woodland school outdoors and other fun.


I second the comments above - you cannot tutor (and would not want to). It helps though that your child is used to sitting and listening to a story, holding a conversation, following instructions, mark making etc - all things they would be doing in a decent nursery. Being active is also important as apparently gross motor skills help with learning, and so may form part of the assessment.


Different schools have different styles. Alleyns seem to focus more on communication skills in assessing at the earliest stages whereas some other schools seem to be looking at writing etc. - which seemed wrong to us aged 4.


If thinking about nurseries/ pre prep you could ask Alleyns (or whichever other schools you look at) where they take kids from at age 7, 9 or 11 - at that age it probably makes more of a difference. I think Herne Hill school sends a lot to Alleyns and the other foundation schools at age 7.


I hope your child will be very happy wherever they go - I am sure they will be given the thought you are already putting into this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...