Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I read about Atlas's comments on a boxing website last night, you're right he does seem genuinely troubled by the scoring (and, as he says, the wider issue on so many fights we never get to see where boxers' careers get screwed).

It's so bent out of shape, surely under investigation it would be deemed illegal. Scoring a round is effectively a comparative quality assessment and therefore there are basic precepts which are applied. For the fight on Saturday an entire new (or reverse) set of precepts would have had to be followed, to get that scoring. If this quality assessment of tradeable physical commodities the crime would be fraud. I'd really like to see some regulation in boxing and accountability mechanisms which included promoter's being at least partly responsible for dodgy scoring by judges. It's all bent out of shape and needs addressing.

  • 3 weeks later...

13 I think.


Britain's boxing champions

Heavyweight Tyson Fury (WBA, WBO), Anthony Joshua (IBF)

Cruiserweight Tony Bellew (WBC)

Super middleweight James DeGale (IBF)

Middleweight Billy Joe Saunders (WBO)

Super welterweight Liam Smith (WBO)

Welterweight Kell Brook (IBF)

Super lightweight Ricky Burns (WBA)

Lightweight Anthony Crolla (WBA), Terry Flanagan (WBO)

Featherweight Lee Selby (IBF)

Bantamweight Jamie McDonnell (WBA), Lee Haskins (IBF)




That's copied from BBC by the way, I couldn't have listed them.

So basically a belt in every weight from Bantam upwards, except Light-Heavyweight.

That's darned good !


The Bellew fight is on YouTube, he looked pretty good actually.

But he needs to up the CW opposition now and get used to the weight, rather than flapping his gums about being the best CW already and prematurely calling-out Lebedev (who stops him in 7 IMO).

Not really a hierarchy... I think the WBC and WBA are more prestigious. WBO is not highly regarded.


The Ring magazine has their own ranking/champion system, which at one point was regarded as the most meaningful belt. But thinking about it more... not sure if it's still the case...

Didn't want to post this in the Ali thread for fear of being accused of trying to have a last word or blighting the man's memory. But wanted to post it nonetheless.


KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When I posted earlier I was unaware that Ali had

> apologised to Frazier. The reason I still

> believed otherwise (apart from being unaware of

> the apology, as mentioned) is that I'd seen a

> documentary / feature about Frazier, it focused on

> the abuse and portrayed it as being an open /

> unresolved aspect between the two of them.

> However, thinking about the timing, the doco was

> obviously shot when Frazier was still alive but it

> was well after 15 years ago. So either the doco is

> fibbing, or Frazier and his family didn't believe

> resolution had occurred ?



This is worth a watch, and it does indeed include mention of Ali and Frazier putting their troubles behind them in 2002 (because people had brought them together). I just think that was way too late and Joe had to live with that bitterness far too long.


 

You won't let it lie will you.


When I was at school kids would ask you who was the champion of the world (this was after Ali lost to Frazier in the first fight), and if you dared to say Joe Frazier you'd get some righteous ras claat licks. This is what you got coming to you boy.


Ali is the King of the world forever. Let that be a lesson to you.

  • 1 month later...

Kovalev v Ward is an interesting fight. Definite two top LWHs, both an incredible skillset.

My predictions are usually way out, nevertheless when I think about this contest I imagine Ward just being too clever for Kovalev and scraping a points win (I assume the fight will be in Oakland CA, as ever with Ward).

Kov won't have fought as unorthodox a boxer as Ward and I think he'll get frustrated and outpointed.

Any other predictions for this fight ?

the pics of Golovkin next to Brook as part of the press tour show that Golovkin is a bigger built man. His head is larger, all the dimensions are bigger. I know he's a natural MW, but when you see them together it's not just 'weight'. The skeleton of GGG is bigger, he's got a bigger frame to hang off.

Prediction time: I think Brook will dazzle and I think he'll connect on GGG, several times, but he'll get caught in the end. GGG has a decent chin (watch how the Geale fight ended) and unless it's a perfectly clean power shot from Brook I can's see GGG getting to hurt. It's possible that Brook wears GGG down with his accurate punching, but it feels like that'll happen but the other way round.

  • 3 weeks later...

Watched the Errol Spence v Bundy contest at weekend, Spence showed some skill and broke down Bundu finishing with an impressive KO.

When I re-watched the card next day I saw a contest which I must have been asleep through previously, it was arguably the best fight of the night. Heather Hardy v Shelly Vincent. An incredible fight in so many ways.


If you can find the full fight on YouTube / internet I recommend you watch it.


Here's a highlights reel:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block.
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...