Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When we were using our Bee (given up - got fed up with the buggy this time round), we used the Lascal mini and it worked absolutely fine. Think we had it with the Bee forward facing and I cant now remember if it makes it better or worse when the buggy is front facing!
We've used both lascal and the bugaboo one and preferred the lascal. The bugaboo one is easy to take off and put on but I find the 3 wheel design throws the balance of the whole pushchair off, I have I work hard to keep it straight. It's not a deal breaker but its a bit annoying. The lascal was also easy to remove and provided a larger platform for my daughter to stand on.
We've used the bugaboo bee buggy board (bought second hand on ebay) and it's been brilliant. My DS and DD both love using it. DD is only 2 and has been using it since she was 18 months (with big bro in buggy...) I've have no balancing problems at all although you do need two hands to steer but I think this is more to do with extra weight you're pushing along rather a fault with the three wheel design. Maybe test-drive someone else's to see whether you prefer the Lascal or the Bee board? Good luck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That % of “affected” doesn’t mean they are all in deep trouble.  It means this will touch on them in some small way mostly - apart from the biggest farms  it’s like high rate tax earners taking to the street when Osborne dragged child/benefit claimants into self assessment.  A mild pain  the more I read, the more obviously confected it is. Still - just as with farage and his banking “woes”, a social media campaign is no barrier to the gullible  what percentage of farms affected by Brexit and to what degree compared go IHT?  Or does that not matter? Thats different money is it? 
    • Farmers groups say 35% of farms will be affected while the Treasury reckons its 27% - neither figure is a tiny portion. The problem is farming is often asset rich but cash poor meaning that those who inherit farms and have to pay the tax will likely need to sell land to pay for it and could well further impact the cash poor nature and productivity of that farm. I would have thought those who align on the left would be welcoming farmers protesting on the streets against a government making their lives more difficult. Good on them. Makes a change from tube and rail strikes at least! I was shocked to read that the average weekly earnings for agricultural workers was significantly lower than the national average.  Clearly Labour doesn't consider these working people.
    • A tax change that affects a tiny portion of farmers livelihoods and income - mass protest and wild accusations on forums like this    Brexit which impacted farmers income and uk food security far far far more ? Crickets. Absolutely nothing. “Price worth paying mate “   Don’t  be fooled about what this is about - it’s isn’t IHT.  
    • In deed, doesn't matter if he is a talented presenter he is, in my view, an rrrrrrsss.  Interestingly Farage was pronounced with a hard g.  But he affected the continental soft g.  Similar to the UK and US pronunciations of garage.  I've worked with people who were at school with him
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...