Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,


I'm hoping to pick some brains about baby monitors as I'm finding the internet a bit of a minefield and I'm not really sure if what I want (or what I think I want) exists.


We are expecting our second child shortly and number 1 will be just under 2. I'm not ready to let go of baby number 1's baby monitor because although he usually sleeps through, we don't always hear him from downstairs if he does wake (when ill or something)and he still has the bars on his cot etc. so wouldn't be able to alert us if he had been sick or was upset. We have had a fairly straightforward BT monitor since he was born which we've always been happy with (temperature, ability to mute, not many other functions) but recently the screen has broken which is more annoying than it first sounds so we're looking to replace this one regardless of what overall decision we make. Could happily make do with a cheap replacement though since I don't think he'll be using it for that much longer. However, I'm also toying with the idea of whether a video monitor could be useful for him to allow him to play in his room on his own sometimes without me having to run upstairs every time there is a suspicious noise (or a suspicious silence which usually means more naughtiness!) as he gets older.


For baby number 2, we are also considering a video monitor for other reasons. Specifically, with the experience of number 1, I think I would feel a lot happier sleep training if I could check on the baby with the use of a video monitor. I dismissed the idea with baby #1 because I thought it would make me neurotic and that I would keep checking unnecessarily but I actually think it would avoid unnecessary trips into his room which we really could have done without when trying to get first baby to sleep (e.g. certain crying, not sure if it's because he's hurt himself or ended up in a funny position or because he is crying because he wants us - nb we never did full on controlled crying but more gradual retreat kind of stuff and leaving to resettle for short periods in the middle of the night before going in).


Probably more detailed than anyone needed but basically I would really appreciate any info or thoughts on any of this. What I think would be useful would be a 'double' video monitor. I think Motorola do one of these but I can't work out how it works in practice - do you have to decide which child you want to check on? In which case, how does it work at night when you want to be alerted if either child wakes up? Or is it easier to just have two monitors? Any good/bad experiences with video monitors (and/or recommendations for brands)? Basically any thoughts on any of this would be great because I'm completely lost!


Many thanks...x

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/47078-baby-monitors-for-two-children/
Share on other sites

Hi there. We had a Summer video monitor for no 1 and bought an additional camera when the 2nd one arrived. So we use one parent monitor for 2 cameras in two different rooms, you can add 4 cameras to it. We are very happy with Summer. As you say we use the camera during daytime to check on the eldest. We can also talk to her through the monitor. In terms of which camera you choose to monitor - it has a scan function. So it scans each camera every 10-20 seconds, so you can actually keep an eye on both rooms. If you want to just watch one room, you choose to view that room. We recommend it, although we did not do a huge amount of comparison when we first bought it three years ago.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
    • That % of “affected” doesn’t mean they are all in deep trouble.  It means this will touch on them in some small way mostly - apart from the biggest farms  it’s like high rate tax earners taking to the street when Osborne dragged child/benefit claimants into self assessment.  A mild pain  the more I read, the more obviously confected it is. Still - just as with farage and his banking “woes”, a social media campaign is no barrier to the gullible  what percentage of farms affected by Brexit and to what degree compared go IHT?  Or does that not matter? Thats different money is it? 
    • Farmers groups say 35% of farms will be affected while the Treasury reckons its 27% - neither figure is a tiny portion. The problem is farming is often asset rich but cash poor meaning that those who inherit farms and have to pay the tax will likely need to sell land to pay for it and could well further impact the cash poor nature and productivity of that farm. I would have thought those who align on the left would be welcoming farmers protesting on the streets against a government making their lives more difficult. Good on them. Makes a change from tube and rail strikes at least! I was shocked to read that the average weekly earnings for agricultural workers was significantly lower than the national average.  Clearly Labour doesn't consider these working people.
    • A tax change that affects a tiny portion of farmers livelihoods and income - mass protest and wild accusations on forums like this    Brexit which impacted farmers income and uk food security far far far more ? Crickets. Absolutely nothing. “Price worth paying mate “   Don’t  be fooled about what this is about - it’s isn’t IHT.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...