Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was always under the impression that mobile phone insurance covered breakdown (outside manufacturers warranty.)

Not so. Apparently O2 etc only cover loss/theft/accidental damage.


I've found a few companies on-line that offer both but not sure how reliable they are.

Also, I'm not very keen on getting a rubbish refurbished one if anything does happen to mine.


Any recommendations please. I have a new phone & although I've luckily never had to claim in the past, I feel much happier knowing it is covered.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46906-mobile-phone-insurance/
Share on other sites

Insurance is a scam, but thats another issue. The Sale of Goods act give longer cover than you think - more than the oft quoted 1 year guarantee - if you make a pain in the arse of yourself with The retailer/ Shop. The assistant ho flooged the ophone will unlikely be clued on on this, so expect to have to pull your own hair out.

Unless you're prone to losing/breaking your phones or having them stolen then insurance isn't for you (I've never had it in my 15 years of phone ownership).


As vgrant says you can try and get it repaired if it's under six years old...be prepared to put in a bit of effort depending on the retailer!


http://blog.moneysavingexpert.com/2013/10/22/how-long-do-you-have-to-take-faulty-goods-back/

I have a simple rule - I never insure anything that I can cover myself (even at a push). As TED said, if people threw the premiums they pay on mobile phone insurance, boiler cover, extended warranties (just another form of insurance) and the like into a bank account, you'd cover all these things yourself (unless you are supremely unlucky).


That includes excesses on things like car insurance - sometimes you are paying around ?100 a year to bring an excess down from ?500 to ?200. Terrible value.

The thing is, I can't cover it myself.


The phone is worth over ?500 & the contract lasts 2 years.


I haven't had a new phone for nearly 3 years. Before then, insurance always covered breakdown. I know this because I also had insurance for my daughter's phone. It developed a few faults (after a year) & each time was sent away for repair free of charge.


I've never lost my phone, damaged it or had it stolen. But there's always a first time..........................


What happens if?


And what happens if the phone packs up in 12 months time when I still have a year left on my contract. I can't believe that O2/Vodafone etc charge ?12.50 a month for insurance & it doesn't even include breakdown.


Thanks everyone for posting the above links but I'm still none the wiser. Would prefer if somebody had recommendations from certain companies that they used & thought were good/bad if possible.

Well for a start 12 * 12 = 144 so you would accumulate 288 over two years. Second "worth" over 500. You will see your phone appearing on ebay if it hasn't already at regularly reducing prices. After a year it will probably be ?200. The rapid advance of phone technology can be exploited by the careful user. I bought an htc one for ?100 after my htc sv locked up. And I sold that as faulty for ?50.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know how much I could accumulate if I didn't pay

> it t-e-d but what if it breaks in 13 months after

> warranty ends or it gets stolen next week?!



As per the links above, you have six years in England Wales to force the manufacturer to repair it free of charge if it breaks down.

When I renewed my home insurance I made sure I had cover for my mobile included on that.


I got a new phone recently, and the contract came with "free one month insurance" - and, of course, then twenty three months of extortionate payments which they were hoping I wouldn't notice.


They just hope people won't cancel (which I did - earlier today).


As with many things, if you can try to put aside a certain amount a month yourself, it's a better bet than insurance because if you don't need to use it for what you've put it aside for, you've still got the money - whereas with insurance, the money is just lining somebody else's pockets.


But I can understand that if you've got a very expensive phone and you lose it after a short time, that may not work if you've not built up enough money to replace it and don't have any other money you can use.

Any non-compulsory insurance market suffers from adverse selection - the people most likely to take it out are those who think they are likely to need it - and so doesn't offer value if you are low risk. Products like mobile phone insurance are particularly bad because it's very difficult to build pricing models that reflect risk - you can't really ask someone to tick a box saying 'are you very clumsy?'

The simple solution is to have

A cheaper phone.

I have a windows Lumia 7

It makes phone calls, sends and receives texts

Has Internet access and Wi-Fi

It was free .

It does not make tea.

It does amaze me that anyone would

Spend ?500 on a phone especially

When they do not have a lot of money

Get a cheaper phone that you can afford

To replace

Not having a go Aquarius

Honest

Foxy

I didn't pay a penny for the phone Foxy, just took out a new contract which costs no more than my old one.


My last insurance was from the network provider and was expensive & limited on what was covered, so by finding a cheaper, better one I'll be paying out less each month :)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The simple solution is to have

> A cheaper phone.


Quite. Mine cost about 10 quid from a chain electrical store.


It is really good at making phone calls. And is completely unlocked, so I can use whatever sim I like.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I believe that public transport was once excluded from central Dulwich, so if you wanted to take e.g. a bus to 'Dulwich' the Library was about as close as you could get and hence that became Dulwich for maps. The Estate thought that public transport was infra dig. 
    • You have been asked who should stump up Rockets rather than farmers (obviously most are stumping up due to tax thresholds being frozen).  It seems like you champion every group that is unhappy with action from a Labour government or a Labour local authority.  It would be great to know how revenue would be better raised, beyond your support to part privatisation of the NHS.  Or are you small state when the government should cut everything and people should stand up for themselves.  Of course that would include cutting all winter fuel payments. Clarkson similarly didn't answer that question yesterday playing to the audience and making the usual lazy stereotypical comments, woke BBC, useless civil servants.  It was like I saw Johnson making it a pantomime rather than responding to fair questions. Not that I am labelling you as either of course 😊
    • Can this thread be renamed "Finding Dulwich" or "Where's Dulwich" or "Depends where you're coming from?"
    • Perhaps someone from the Dulwich society can enlighten us on why Dulwich Library/ Dulwich Plough is deemed "Dulwich" for geographical purposes. 🙏 Personally I had always thought it was because it was determined as that for the tram stop in the days of trams and then for the number 12 bus.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...