Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is there anyone "medical" that can help.


My daughter had her MMR jab at 12 months and her booster at 15mths. This is in accordance with the red book issued by Southwark. There is no mention of any further MMR boosters being required as printed in the inoculation schedule.


We have now moved out of London and are with another health authority. Their view is that the booster should be done between 3 and 5 years and having it at 15 months is too early. They claim she is subsequently no longer covered and therefore want her to have another booster.


I have refused for obvious reasons. Surely the current London "way" is different not wrong. I can't seem to find any conclusive evidence either way.......


Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46758-mmr-jab-and-booster/
Share on other sites

The "green book" on immunisations is probably the best place to look - produced by the Centre of Disease Control.


This link below should take you to a PDF of chapter 21 of the green book which covers measles/MMR vaccination. The second paragraph on the 9th page states "if the child is given the second dose less than three months after the first dose and at less than 18 months old, then the routine pre-school dose (3rd dose) should be given to ensure full protection"


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/147968/Green-Book-Chapter-21-v2_0.pdf


I think as a result of the poor uptake of the MMR a few years ago, particularly in South East London, Southwark started giving three doses of MMR routinely to pre-school age children.

My daughter had all her jabs, then I stopped. I'm so torn between what to do. She's now nearly 6 and has been through a lot, she has a fear of needles after many blood tests and I feel emotionally its a difficult choice to make. She was due her preschool boosters 3 years ago (including MMR), I get constant reminders from our GP practice. I've spoke to my GP about having them done in the near future and if additional jabs will be needed, she assured me that she can have it any time and it would be the same as if she had it on schedule. Of course the other thing that gets me is that no jabs are 100% effective so I always think in the back of my mind whats the point in doing them. I'm completely unvaccinated, except for when I had my last child and was practically forced to get the MMR shots to protect my future pregnancies.


There is definitely 3 MMR shots in Southwark at least.

Gina - the more important one is the tetanus in the pre-sch booster, very definitely worth getting done as at the moment she wouldn't be covered properly if soil/dirt/rust got into any open wound - not saying this to freak you out, but it would be needed urgently as a catch-up if she ended up in A&E (which I doubt would help her phobia).


Would suggest taking a v slow route into her helping her to have the jab at the GP ("Get well soon" on cbeebies had an ep on immunisations which might help her/encourage positive discussion) so that it isn't done as an emergency (on top of an emergency IYSWIM).


With regard to the MMR - *definitely* not 3 MMR's in Southwark/Lambeth or Lewisham. Oxalis is correct in what is quoted from the Green Book (aka bible!) in that they have to be given at least 3mths apart, which is why (if given on schedule) their given at 12mths & 3 mths later at 15mths.


The only time a 3rd jab wound be given is if (due to close living proximity to an index case of measles) an infant under 1yr is given the jab due to it not being as effective under a year (thus not given younger).


Hope this helps, & thanks for getting my *nearly finished mat leave* brain functioning again :-)

I hate to say this really because I know how hard it is seeing your child go through what may feel like unnecessary medical intervention but you must make sure she has her necessary vaccinations. I'd even contemplate going in with her and having a tetanus booster myself and showing her how easy it is. I think the more positive and emotionally strong you can be can only benefit your daughter GinaG3. As a parent, our attitude to health professionals is really picked up by our children.

Have you tried using an aesthetic cream for your daughter ahead of getting a vaccination/blood test done? Your GP can prescribe it and you put it on an hour or so before the vaccination and it numbs the area where the needle goes in.


From a young age I developed a phobia of needles and could faint at the prospect of having an injection. I'm pleased to say I eventually got over the phobia but it took until I was about 30. The cream really helped me though so I hope it might help your daughter.


Good luck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
    • That % of “affected” doesn’t mean they are all in deep trouble.  It means this will touch on them in some small way mostly - apart from the biggest farms  it’s like high rate tax earners taking to the street when Osborne dragged child/benefit claimants into self assessment.  A mild pain  the more I read, the more obviously confected it is. Still - just as with farage and his banking “woes”, a social media campaign is no barrier to the gullible  what percentage of farms affected by Brexit and to what degree compared go IHT?  Or does that not matter? Thats different money is it? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...