Jump to content

Recommended Posts

capt_birdseye Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Read my first ever Harlen Coben last week which I

> picked up at the Book Swap. Terribly written,

> outrageous plot, unsympathetic characters, and a

> real page-turner. Bit of a guilty pleasure!


Exactly, they're bloody great!!! >:D<

Some of his are better than others (I've read most I think), but basically the plots will involve someone who died or went missing ages ago seeming to kind of turn up again.


I should mention Tony Parsons' "stories we could tell", really really enjoyed it. It was set a year before I was born, but I could still relate totally to the characters, and enjoyed the nostalgia. Jah I'll give it to you next time I see you, basically the main characters are about the age you would have been the year it was set. Would be interested to see if you think it rings true or not.


Have just started the second adventure of Captain Alatriste "Purity of Blood" by Arturo Perez-Reverte having read the first one sometime last year. They're really nicely written books set in early 17th century Spain, and offer quite a bit of interesting history around the fictional story. Apparently the author (a war reporter) was disgusted by the lack of 17th century history in his daughter's school text books, he decided to write about the era.

  • 3 weeks later...

Finished Caro Fraser's The Pupil earlier this week. The hero comes from East Dulwich and at one point says:


'Piers,' he said. Piers looked at him enquiringly. 'As we say in East Dulwich, Piers,' continued Anthony in a quiet, conversational tone, 'why don't you fuck off?'


Also read Rebecca for the book club - quite a gothic romp.


Have started White Teeth which I enjoy for short periods but can't settle down to a long read with it.


As a little aside, have started reading Alexander McCall Smith's online book, Corduroy Mansions, which is here if you fancy it: C. Mansions


My guilty read this week is Deathly Hallows for the umpteenth time.

I'm reading Karoo by Steve Tesich. I like it a lot. It trips you up - one minute you can't believe how vile the characters are and you're enjoying a rather biting satire on LA life; the next a single sentence will beautifully demonstrate how f**king hard it is to be human.

Even sadder that its author (who wrote the screenplay The World According to Garp) died of a heart attack shortly after completing it.

started a new one over the weekend, called "sister kate:nursing through the troubles". its basically the memories of sister kate o,hanlon who was the head sister of the royal victoria hospital, a&e dept, belfast at the height of the troubles. talk about an eye opener. highly recommended.

if you like kate atkinson, you might enjoy her brilliant play called "Abandonment". it's in a similar vein to emotionally weird (and behind the scenes at the museum, her other well-known one) but sometimes reading plays is a nice departure from novels (& mags and rags)


btw, i have just finished "The Year of Magical Thinking" by Joan Didion, which was excellent. it deals primarily with grief, though, and not for the faint-hearted. i swear i could have filled the tub with my geyser of tears.

Ah shoshntosh.... I don't often see mentions of Abandonment - did you see it on stage? I saw it up in Edinburgh (gosh that'll be about eight years ago now) and it was pretty awful..... maybe it was the production.

But I agree reading plays can sometimes be great - Owen McCafferty's monologues (published alongside his play Mojo Mickybo if I remember righty) are beautiful. And I remember debbie tucker green's Born Bad being an incredibe read.

Also just wondering if anybody out there is feeling anxious about the new film version of Brideshead Revisited? One of my favourite books of all time .... I'm feeling terribly protective of it!


(the lead actor playing Charles does look rather dishy though!)

rather agree with you about Brideshead, but have what I feel MUST be larger concerns.


OMG!!!


Have you heard [spit] Knightley is going to be allowed to mangle Eliza Doolittle in a new My Fair Lady? I'm so upset. And it's definitely not just the yoghurt talking.

**Waves at Moos** Hello!



Mmmm, I don't know about Keira - sometime when I see her interviewed there is a playfulness that could serve Eliza rather well...I haven't seen many of her films to comment on her acting.


Equus is a great play. I saw the recent production and it was pretty solid - but maybe a little too polished - I saw a production at university which in its scruffy, low-budget way, somehow touched me far more.

I don't know, something about her sharp teeth bothers me.


Back to Brideshead, didn't you think Sebastian's eventual fate was extraordinarily cruel, although so well plotted that it could only be seen as inevitable? Breaks my heart just thinking about it.


I'm currently reading Sebastian Faulks' The Fatal Englishman, which is fascinating - thanks to whomever donated it to the ED book swap.

  • 1 month later...

I finished No Highway by Neville Shute in the wee, small hours of this morning. Very nicely written and with splashes of humour, slightly frothy in places but not in a yukky way.


[i have it in mind for Mamora Man at the next book swap]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...