Jump to content

Mum shocked by 'dogging' exploits - SLP 13 April


Recommended Posts

Clearly the Forum is becoming a must visit for all sorts of journalists - see page 7 in today's SLP.


To give you a flavour:


"Writing on the East Dulwich Forum one mum said "Oh My God.""!


and: "DulwichMum wrote: "These people are filth. They should be boiled in oil and have their children confiscated by social services.""

SLP - call that journalism?

If all these people can muster as news is picking up banter from a website, they are sadder even than I had thought.

Actually, Marina Hyde in The Grauniad is just as bad - quoting material from political gossip websites and claiming it as her own.

OHMYGOD! I just read the article, and it reads as though I am completely seriously saying that these people should be boiled in oil! Ha, ha, ha!


I wonder if they will put in a quote from me soon, mentioning how I intend to ship my current au pair home to Lithuania in a crate - have they no sense of humour?


I mean, everyone knows that au pairs must pay for their own transportation home, if she chooses to travel by crate - who am I to argue?


DM

Perhaps, in future, if anyone decides to make any lighthearted comment - in jest - on the forum, they should always follow it up with " - JOKE!!!!" so that those of limited intelligence (and any Americans who might be reading) might not be unduly mislead.

>>I actaully said that line here on the forum - so I am sure they can do what they like! Shame, I could do with a 100 guineas. I could do with a spray tan...<<


of course you did - how could I forget? But still...plagiarism is plagiarism, inetllectual property is intellectual property :))


Spray tans are so "Footballers' Wives" though....

Ohmygod, never again! James says I was loud and larey (do you spell it that way?). I am so sorry if I talked too much or offended anyone, I was out of control. I have a huge black footprint on one leg of my white jeans - what could have happened there? Also, I seem to have lost one of the heels from my peep toe shoes!


DM

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...