Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyone else feel fed up with the amount of daytime coverage all the various sex abuse investigations get?


I feel I can't listen to the radio, read a newspaper or watch TV news at all with my kids around, because of the salacious way these news items are reported, hour after hour. I have an 8 year old who can quite easily pick up the words, and I have to divert attention away to avoid unnecessary distress.


These reports often mention the "loss of innocence" of the victims, and I am truly sympathetic, but I'd rather it not be plastered all over the mainstream media until after the watershed, to save the innocence of the majority of young children that will thankfully not be subject to such crimes.


It seems as a society we are at once obsessed with the non-sexualisation of children, whilst freely discussing the very small minority of people that hold no regard for the law, which *almost* normalises it.


If we must be told on a regular basis about the goings on of Savile, Harris etc, couldn't the crimes be just alluded to on the daytime reports? After all, as adults we are all sadly fully aware of what 'Operation Yewtree' means....


Or am I just being over-sensitive???

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/46562-i-heard-the-news-today-oh-boy/
Share on other sites

I have to agree that I find the level of coverage totally needless and almost to the level of glamourising the pursuit of the perpetrators. But it seems to be the way of news these days - any big story is done to death. Afraid I tend to vote with the off button - which sadly means I miss out on lots of news I would be interested in. But likewise, I don't want to have to start explaining it to the kids - not in the level of detail it's discussed on screen.
This is the opposite of how I feel. I don't have the TV news on in front of my two as I think they can sense the negative vibes/serious affect of the newsreaders in general even if they don't understand the words (age 3.5 and 1). I instead get my news from the written word. But I actually am so frustrated that the coverage, marginally 'better late than never' is not galvanising people into action, it's so incredibly outrageous, just bloody awful. I can't stand the thought of these crimes, committed on the youngest and most vulnerable, the members of society we should have been protecting, hideous things happening to kids without families who could keep them safe, while I was growing up in relative paradise in terms of childhood. I hate the heinous cover up and the whitewash/planned cover up of the cover up about to start... The investigation is to be overseen by that Butler-Sloss woman who has connections to past cover-ups/inadequate inquiries and has conflicts of interest, including links to her brother and the lost files I believe!? The whole thing sickens me to my core and I think people are so desensitised they can't process or even hear the enormity and vileness of what has happened and still happens. I feel so so angry and I just hope justice, whatever that could possibly look like, is served and that wholesale change can occur in the way we look at and treat society's most vulnerable and most powerless. I'm not holding my breath though, very sadly.

I agree it's shocking and depressing and that these crimes should come to light - I don't think anyone is disputing that - but I would also agree that much of the reporting is in itself quite salacious. And yes, I find myself leaping over to the radio to turn it off on an almost daily basis when my nine- and seven-year-old are in the room. Depressing is the word.


I feel rather the same about some of the news reports as I do about misery memoirs - I always slightly wonder whether there's a minority of readers who actually get off on the material that's exposing these awful stories (in explicit detail, of course). It all feels a bit grubby.

bluesuperted Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is the opposite of how I feel. I don't have

> the TV news on in front of my two as I think they

> can sense the negative vibes/serious affect of the

> newsreaders in general even if they don't

> understand the words (age 3.5 and 1). I instead

> get my news from the written word. But I actually

> am so frustrated that the coverage, marginally

> 'better late than never' is not galvanising people

> into action, it's so incredibly outrageous, just

> bloody awful. I can't stand the thought of these

> crimes, committed on the youngest and most

> vulnerable, the members of society we should have

> been protecting, hideous things happening to kids

> without families who could keep them safe, while I

> was growing up in relative paradise in terms of

> childhood. I hate the heinous cover up and the

> whitewash/planned cover up of the cover up about

> to start... The investigation is to be overseen by

> that Butler-Sloss woman who has connections to

> past cover-ups/inadequate inquiries and has

> conflicts of interest, including links to her

> brother and the lost files I believe!? The whole

> thing sickens me to my core and I think people are

> so desensitised they can't process or even hear

> the enormity and vileness of what has happened and

> still happens. I feel so so angry and I just hope

> justice, whatever that could possibly look like,

> is served and that wholesale change can occur in

> the way we look at and treat society's most

> vulnerable and most powerless. I'm not holding my

> breath though, very sadly.


Not sure I understand?


Is it that you don't feel that any of the recent reporting has been "salacious" or "almost to the level of glamourising the pursuit of the perpetrators"?


Or, I am more correct to understand that you do feel strongly that not enough truly investigative reporting is being undertaken and objectively reported?

I was referring to the OP feeling 'fed up' with the coverage - I feel sick about the content, sick at the hypocrisy of the media outlets who are now finally starting to report on things which have been known for years (eg Jimmy Savile etc) and covered up by many - but not fed up to be hearing these stories, even though it's hard to take and makes me angry each time I come into contact with the story. I hadn't really taken away the glamourising/salacious coverage although I'm sure it exists (as I said I mainly consume news in written format these days). I do agree that the coverage may be incredibly painful, triggering and unhelpful for other victims (especially re victim blaming that often follows).


Hope that clarifies what I meant.

Bluesuperted, I wasn't for one minute condoning the crimes, but just expressing my sadness that we have to have quite such lewd detail plastered across our ears and eyes day in, day out. You mention that as a nation we may be getting desensitised, but I think this is another reason not to constantly bombard us with the graphic details. What benefit really does having a daily report on Rolf Harris' et al trial provide, other than to sell newspapers/get ratings/visitors to websites? As a deterrent simply reporting that he was arrested, tried and sentenced to a significant amount of time in prison would have sufficed, surely?


As Saffron says, all this coverage is unhelpful for victims too. Those most affected by these or unreported crimes may well be less likely to report them for fear of becoming national news.


Every news report with flashing images from cameras carries a warning beforehand. But sex crime reporting seems to be totally harmless, in the eyes of the news media, it seems...

Depending on what print media you're consuming you're very likely getting a significantly different slant on the topic. You're also possibly choosing when, where, and how much you read about it.


Whereas, if you sit down to listen to radio or televised news, the style of reporting seems very poor to me. I would go so far as to say that quite a lot of televised coverage seems to aggrandise the pursuit of paedophiles in a minimally objective reporting style, and to the exclusion of other significant news issue.


Although I think this may be more a typical problem of mainstream media, than specifically a problem with reporting this type of news. I agree that cases of molestation and paedophilia need to be investigated and reported. I don't agree that lurid details and virtual witch hunts will promote the cause of good investigative journalism. It's tabloid style reporting gone mainstream. What a waste.

No I definitely wasn't suggesting that ladywotlunches - I actually think we were talking at cross purposes as I thought your post referenced the wider MP/VIP/establishment child abuse scandal and cover up - which I think we need to hear a lot about because it's been hidden for so long whereas now I think I misunderstood and you were talking about lurid details of the Savile/Harris/Clifford crimes? I agree we don't need to know the sordid ins and outs of these abusers' activities. But I do think we need to hear more about the wider cover up, it's heinous and those responsible (many) may well continue to escape proper justice. In Belgium when this happened in the 90s I think people were protesting and there was visible anger and desire to call people to account, whereas I think people are not quite hearing how grave the situation is for some reason. Hopefully I'm wrong and pressure will build from many angles, so this investigation can be rigorous and transparent rather than whitewash.
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...