Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We had the same issue with a property in cp. We couldn't get insurance and our broker said resale would be an issue.


The only insures who would touch us - based on a regular full structural survey was Midas - part of RSA. Steep excess for a subsidence claim but if you really love the place and willing to take a risk them speak to them.


We decided against buying but I'm over cautious about everything

But on the other hand ,if you buy a house that's already been underpinned and has a certificate of competency ,isn't that a good thing ?

In that lots of houses in this clay soil area need underpinning and at least such a house has already had it done ?

Was it underpinned twice in the same place? Was it done by the same insurance company both times? Was it under guarantee when it was done the second time? Perhaps Barry Road houses suffer from subsidence due to the buses going up and down the road. Ivydale Road seems to suffer from the same problems.

another question is whether or not you are buying the freehold or are you going to be a leaseholder? If it is a lease then you need not worry as much as the responsibility probably lies with the freeholder.


I would probably walk away if you are taking on the freehold unless some guarantees can be made or you have a full structural review of it.

Sorry to disagree, but you may well find that the freeholder will just reclaim the money from the lessees.

Plus you will lose control of managing the situation/controlling costs, etc.




Richy86 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> another question is whether or not you are buying

> the freehold or are you going to be a leaseholder?

> If it is a lease then you need not worry as much

> as the responsibility probably lies with the

> freeholder.

>

> I would probably walk away if you are taking on

> the freehold unless some guarantees can be made or

> you have a full structural review of it.

brightfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi

> I'm looking at a house for sale on Barry Road. It

> turns out the property has suffered subsidence

> very badly and has been underpinned twice. Most of

> the other houses close by are also showing severe

> signs of movement. No one will give me a quote for

> insurance without a structural engineers report.

> Can anyone give advice? By my mind this should be

> heavily discounted compared to a similar house

> without structural problems. The whole front

> garden and front wall appear to be falling

> massively towards the road. Without insurance I

> wouldn't be able to get a mortgage on it. Should I

> just run away?

> Also, prices in the East Dulwich area really seem

> to be dropping, open house days have stopped and

> estate agents are calling me instead of me calling

> them (despite what you read in the press a buyers

> market seems to be returning), should I just sit

> and wait for 6 months?

> Thanks


If you know that the whole front garden and wall are already falling away then this doesn't sound like an insurable property. (If you know it's collapsing then it's not an insurable risk). If you had the cash, it might be worth offering a sensible amount to allow for (what sounds like certain) necessary underpinning plus, a minimum of, say, ?50K for risk. If you need a mortgage for anything more than the land value then you're probably wasting your time.


Also, I'm not sure sold prices are dropping (land registry sold price only had a few spikes, mostly constant upward trend) just the prices that houses are being put up for sale at. There did seem to be a couple of months of overoptimistic marketing but that has calmed down (except for a few mad hopefuls out there). Now we're into the holiday season the spring rush is over.

Hi


I wouldn't touch the house, with forward thinking

you will want to sell the house at some point which will

be difficult especially as there is no paper work

for the underpinning.


Leave well alone another house will come along, if it looks

like a bargain it is because of the underpinning.


Can say you have not been warned!!

Much of the subsidence in Barry Road was due to the poor management by Southwark of the trees, many insurance companies took legal action against the council for failing to maintain the trees resulting in over growth and root damage to sewers etc. That is why the trees are cut back very severely some years. My neighbour had subsidence over 10 years ago and he ended up paying several thousands in excess payments. His insurance company got some money back from Southwark

Yes that's the one I was thinking of. It could be a really amazing house, but it will be a nightmare to sell on. You're talking about spending hundreds of thousands refurbishing a house, which you may end up having to let go for a knockdown price.


But if you really love the place, maybe worth getting a thorough structural survey (i.e. not the type the banks offer for a few hundred quid) to establish whether the underpinning is adequate and whether there's any signs of current/recent movement. And then try to find out what price the vendor is realistically hoping to get.

Hmmm - engineers report? Trouble is you need to see if it is still moving - are the present owners monitoring ? 6/12 months data is good.


Usual trick isto tape over cracks and see if the paper rucks up - properly done you put ceramic straps across the cracks and see if they break with the movement


~And remember clay both shrinks and expands with water etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...