Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Kate, my take on it was:


> - What seems to be their preference for the

> criteria for entry, will it be distance,

> 'ability'-bands, affiliation with local primaries,

> or some combination of these?


Distance & banding - no affiliation to local primary schools. Distance not necessarily measured from the school site - nodal points was mentioned (when questioned)


>

> - It will be a mixed school but will there be

> single-sex classes up to Year 9 as I believe they

> have in one of their other schools.


Single sex up to Yr 9, mixed recreational activities

>

> - Does it sound like there be ways for children

> living miles away to go this school (via music

> 'scholarships' or whatever?)


No intention to have a scholarship entry for specific specialism

>

> - Apart from music, will they want to be known for

> any other specialisms?


The specifically said they weren't intending to have any specialism

>

> - How big do they anticipate the outdoor

> playground/sports area will be (they presumably

> have a rough idea of the building footprint)? Do

> they expect all sport to be done on-site, or do

> they plan to share facilities elsewhere as Harris

> Boys Academy does.


They didn't touch on this at all.


> - Do they have anything to say about the rival

> Charter bid? Why go with Haberdashers instead of

> Charter?


No mention other than there was another bid by Charter.


Kristy x

They were very explicit that they do not have a firm idea or preference for admission criteria beyond a) no lottery or random element and b) no specialism / scholarship element. They said that therefore there will have to be a distance criteria. Distance from where, and whether banded or not is something they seek opinion on. There was a form in the packs handed out for people to fill in on this question.
Thanks for this banaome, you've summarised well on the admissions front. What may not have been clear last night is that it is possible to set up a nodal point or points from which to measure distance. These nodal admissions points would mean people living in the 'black hole' areas would be in catchment. The parent steering group will push on this if it's what the community wants. Please put it on your feedback forms if you think it's important.
Thanks for the meeting. I thought it was really useful to meet the staff from Haberdashers. And speaking as someone who lives in a black hole of no secondary schools, and who has a non-catholic daughter due to start secondary school in 2016, I feel really pleased that they will consider public opinion when it comes to finally deciding how the admissions will work.
Thanks for the info re nodal points - as someone who lives in one of the school black holes that's really interesting. I thought the meeting was really useful and they had a clear focus on setting up a good comprehensive school, which I think is great. Unfortunately I had to leave before questions (daughter needed to go to bed!) but thought it was useful to get a feel for the federation - they seemed very focused on education as a priority.

If anybody didn't hand in their feedback form or their form registering support last night, please could you post it to: Hatcham East Dulwich School Project, Haberdashers' Aske's Federation, Pepys Road, London SE14 5SF


Or you can email [email protected]


If anybody would like their forms in an electronic format please send a PM. Thanks!

Letter from Michael Gove to Tessa Jowell:


http://tessajowell.net/uploads/75682827-96a8-1334-592c-2fefd3813708.pdf


While Southwark as a whole may need more primary places our locality has a far more pressing need for a secondary school, as last night's meeting clearly showed.

God, this is depressing. How do we persuade Gove that we have a secondary crisis looming??? Letter to him? Tessa Jowell? Can Southwark councillor Peter John intervene, as presumably he knows the figures most accurately? What can we parents do, in practical terms?

Suggest as many of you as possible contact your ward Councillor; Peter John (leader of Southwark Council) and Tessa Jowell / Harriet Harman to say that you support the secondary school campaign and do not support a Harris Nunhead Primary on the Dulwich Hospital site.


The Parent Steering Group will do the same.


We are trying to dig out figures to back this up. Will post them here when we have them.


If you follow us on twitter @NewSchDulwich and on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/NewSchDulwich it helps to swell our campaign numbers and demonstrate local demand. As will registering your support for your chosen provider for the proposed new secondary school if you haven't done so already.

I think they used figures from Southwark's report on school places strategy which was commented upon on this thread when it came out back in March.


It shows a defect of secondary places from 2016, the shortfall reaching -527 places by 2019 if no further schools are built. The numbers are borough wide only though and it concludes:


"Examining demand and supply at this more local level indicates that the pressure

for places is likely to be felt in the south of the borough from 2016 onwards, flowing

through to the rest of the borough from 2018 onwards."




http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s45063/Report%20School%20Places%20Strategy%20Update.pdf

Bawdy nan - realised that your question hasn't been answered here. Sorry.


The proposed new secondary school will be six-form entry. The school will be modelled on the Hatcham College school but won't have a music scholarship. There is also scope to do admissions differently in response to community feedback.


If you want a feedback form to fill out and submit to Habs please send a PM.

I would read " scope " as the ability or opportunity to do some thing . I'd be interested to know whether there's the intention to alter the existing Habs admissions by responding to community feedback . And when that intention will be made clear and the admissions strategy known .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
    • That % of “affected” doesn’t mean they are all in deep trouble.  It means this will touch on them in some small way mostly - apart from the biggest farms  it’s like high rate tax earners taking to the street when Osborne dragged child/benefit claimants into self assessment.  A mild pain  the more I read, the more obviously confected it is. Still - just as with farage and his banking “woes”, a social media campaign is no barrier to the gullible  what percentage of farms affected by Brexit and to what degree compared go IHT?  Or does that not matter? Thats different money is it? 
    • Farmers groups say 35% of farms will be affected while the Treasury reckons its 27% - neither figure is a tiny portion. The problem is farming is often asset rich but cash poor meaning that those who inherit farms and have to pay the tax will likely need to sell land to pay for it and could well further impact the cash poor nature and productivity of that farm. I would have thought those who align on the left would be welcoming farmers protesting on the streets against a government making their lives more difficult. Good on them. Makes a change from tube and rail strikes at least! I was shocked to read that the average weekly earnings for agricultural workers was significantly lower than the national average.  Clearly Labour doesn't consider these working people.
    • A tax change that affects a tiny portion of farmers livelihoods and income - mass protest and wild accusations on forums like this    Brexit which impacted farmers income and uk food security far far far more ? Crickets. Absolutely nothing. “Price worth paying mate “   Don’t  be fooled about what this is about - it’s isn’t IHT.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...