Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Much as I dislike the BNP, I'm uneasy about what's been done here. The people on that list have as much right to privacy as you or I. There are children on there - imagine how they're feeling in the playground today.


More in the Graun: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2008/nov/19/bnp-privacy


edited to add: Of course there is a certain element of what goes around coming around, what with all that redwatch nonsense.

I guess as long as it remains a legal political entity then you're right Ant.


Mind you I can understand a frustrated angry person voting BNP as a way to protest or send a signal to the political mainstream, but membership?

It does make my blood run a little cold *shudders*

Once I've stopped smiling, it is probably wrong to bring these people's details into the public arena, though the sound of poop hitting the fan is pretty deafening.


Whoever did it has probably done more to bring down the BNP and surely that's a good thing.


Edited to ask, can the BNP be brought to book for not protecting the data they held?

It's hard to feel sympathy, but surely we all believe that we have an intrinsic right to join any club we like and have any belief we like? I'm with Voltaire on this one.


BNP members might not extend those rights to others, but should we besmirch our own principles to their level?

Notwithstanding the phrase "club" which suggests something cosy and benign, these addresses just shouldn't be in the public domain


If you take something like this forum, would we be happy if our addresses were in the public domain - and in theory and by comparison we have nothing to hide


I would argue wether the BNP should be legal or not, but they are - and their addresses should not be out there

No, I would not be happy if our addressses were in the public domain. The 'if you are doing nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide' argument is the step towards continually having to prove by law that you are doing nothing wrong which erodes our civil liberties. But I am leading the argument towards ID cards, and going off topic.


Although 'club' is not a phrase, it seems an adequate word for an organisation with members.


I think you've put your finger on the right place there - if we don't agree that an organisation should be legal, we can make that argument. But while it is, we must support its right to the same existence and privacy laws that protect us all. If not, whom would you have make the distinctions? I find the thought of it rather unpleasant.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The 'if you are doing nothing

> wrong, you have nothing to hide' argument is the

> step towards continually having to prove by law

> that you are doing nothing wrong which erodes our

> civil liberties.


Not just erodes. Completely obliterates. It negates the concept of innocent until proven guilty which is a fundamental principle of British law.

I agree with the "nothing wrong bizzo"....if someone says "Do you want to be filmed squillions of times during your lifetime on CCTV as blah blah...offer to follow them 24/7 with a Camcorder as see how they like it up the tuckers:))

Yep, Moos you got me right. I'm dead against ID cards and the constant CCTV monitoring.


Another thing about this list - it wouldn't take much for someone malicious to add some names of people who aren't members - next thing you know, teh neighbours pay a visit tothe wrong person


It's all wrong basically

Is that a reference to my adding Sean BcGabhann to the list?..doh, caught red-handed!!


I've a weird feeling that political party membership is in the public domain if you look for it anyway isn't it as all political parties need to be completely transparent in their funding?


Is it just the shoving it on the internet that's a bit naughty here?

On the one hand of course, this kind of public 'outing' of members of fringe groups (which many will find repugnant) is a worrying occurrence which goes against the very civil liberties which many of of us take for granted. "I defend to the death.." and all that jazz. It's the thin end of the wedge - and a surefire descent down a slippery slope from which there may be no turning back.


On the other hand, I tend to think... f@ck 'em.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>I've a weird feeling that political party

> membership is in the public domain if you look for

> it anyway isn't it as all political parties need

> to be completely transparent in their funding?


That was essentially my initial question. Is this information legally confidential in the first place?


The legality of the intention behind publicising it may come up though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...