Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There's probably a perfectly reasonable explanation, but it does look a little strange...


On the corner of Melbourne Grove and East Dulwich Grove there seems to be a quite recent raised crossover (those raised, red brick sections), that is being broken up. I was wondering why?


But as mentioned, there could be a very valid explanation for this.

Let's hope there is a good reason as these raised crossover cost around ?30,000 each.


Just looking at the piles of new materials, it could be that they are going to make the roadway (EDG) narrower there in attempt to slow the traffic at the junction with Melbourne Grove. This is what they did 75 metres away at the junction with Gelngarry Road. They widened both pavements where the bus stop is, making it much more difficult for cars to squeeze past the bus whilst it is at the stop. The logic might be that the public transport service gets priority so that journeys by private cars etc will rarely be quicker than by bus.


Even money they will do something similar further along at Hillsborough Road.

But it had just been done. Check out the pictures, it looks pratically brand new.


As mentioned on that consultation web page:


"A large amount of correspondence was received from local residents and stakeholders relating to traffic speed and the need for improved pedestrian crossing facilities in the area."


I'd be quite interested to know the details of this correspondence. I can't really see any of my neigbours having suddenly taken issue with traffic speeds and woken from their community action malaise...


I'm not saying it isn't a good idea, but it seems wasteful to install a raised carriage way, then demolish the whole thing months later to do the same thing again with a few modifications.


Who pays for this...

LD929 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> there was a consultation on all of these building

> works on east dulwich grove:

>

> http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200431/street_imp

> rovements/3180/east_dulwich_grove



How many letters where sent out,


what area address,s and what was the result for or against spending this additional money


Was this a community Council decision


Cllr Barber please provide

Seconded. My cab "driver" pulled out, causing another driver to plough into the back of a stationary car on LL about two months ago. The police came, so all was sorted on the morning, but it could have been worse. More double yellows on LL adjacent to both sides of Goodrich are needed!
Is this not part of the general road improvements planned along that stretch of road which is meant to be for cycle safety or something? If it is there was quite extensive and very pointless consultation on it some time ago. Still cant imagine how it is supposed to be an improvement or safer...

Yeah - pitched to the local cycling community as an experiment in "going dutch" and then clearly demonstrated thst Southwark Road engineers do not know how to build better roard for cyclists - but as there was budget itsbeen used to improve matters for pedestrians - some gains there


KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this not part of the general road improvements

> planned along that stretch of road which is meant

> to be for cycle safety or something?

The turning in to Glengarry road with the new improved road surface is worse! The bodge job at tarmacing at the raised section is likely to cause a bike to dismount turning in to Glengarry road. Its really not the immaculate job you would expect on a road surface.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this not part of the general road improvements

> planned along that stretch of road which is meant

> to be for cycle safety or something?


Quite a few roads have been narrowed in the name of cycle safety.


As a cyclist, I'm less than convinced. My experience is that drivers go faster along the wider sections to make up for the slower parts... and if there's a cyclist already approaching or in the narrowed bit, well, that just gets them some extra points for a close shave. Or at least that's how it feels in Railton Road (admittedly Herne Hill/Brixton rather than ED)

Yeah - build outs (e.g. for pedestrian crossings) and sharp narrowing make cyclists vulnerable as they (we!!) pull out and risk a collision.


Gentle narrowing better.


Narrow two way trafic gutters parrallel best as it slows traffic.


No more one way streets or gyratories


Poor road surfacing? No change there then - the new Blanchedown Crossing was unfinished and dangerous for weeks!




> Quite a few roads have been narrowed in the name

> of cycle safety.

>

> As a cyclist, I'm less than convinced. My

> experience is that drivers go faster along the

> wider sections to make up for the slower parts...

> and if there's a cyclist already approaching or in

> the narrowed bit, well, that just gets them some

> extra points for a close shave. Or at least

> that's how it feels in Railton Road (admittedly

> Herne Hill/Brixton rather than ED)

I recevied an email about this. I hadnt realised a thread had also been started.

These works of removing this entry treatment and the other one opposite are becsuse they're being repalced with a whole junction raised treatment. This is part of the East Dulwich Grove 20mph and crash reduction plans.

Sadly I culdnt getthe council to implement cycle lanes but this shoudl be a definite improvement and reduce crashes at this junction.

Hi James,


Thanks for the reply. A couple of questions:


- How long had the existing entry treatment been in situ? As you can see from the first photo, it was in excellent condition (looked practically new).


- How much (ball park figure) do these things cost to implement?


- What was the intended lifespan when initially installed?


- How do we assess value for money when considering these building works?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...