Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was attacked a few weeks ago on my route from East Dulwich into town - I take the cycle route behind Old Kent Road (or used to, I should say). There's a point where Oxley Close goes into Chaucer Drive and you have to slow down to go through quite a few cycle bollards. As I was coming out the other side two men knocked me off the bike and kicked my head and back quite a bit before running away. I think it was an attempted bike-jacking - they tried to grab it but I was making a hell of a lot of noise and was lucky that they probably thought it wasn't worth it. This was 7.30 at night, but frankly the place is a hotspot, I'd say, and best avoided, even in the day. It wasn't until afterwards that I realised how vulnerable cyclists are there. I suggested to the police that they put up a camera/warning sign...but they just sort of gawped blankly back at me. I didn't take that as a "yes", so I'd advise everyone to avoid this route - even in the day it's quiet, and the residents have shown a certain reluctance to intervene if there is an incident. Please don't use this route. I suspect it wasn't the first (and won't be the last) time someone gets attacked there.

I think the bollards and fences the council put blocking all the paths, especially at the edge of parks etc are really dangerous and make cycling that bit more difficult, especially if you pull a trailer. They seem to want to encourage cycling in one department and discourage it in others.


I hope you weren't hurt badly. That sounds horrible.

I know exactly where you mean and I've often wobbled my way through there worrying. Hope you're ok.


As with previous incidents reported here, this makes me think that the only viable option for cycling is busy, well-lit roads. But to make those safe to cycle on we're going to need more than a foot-and-a-half of occasional green tarmac. Driver education and proper bike lanes would be a good start.

Thanks for the warning. Glad you're ok.


I don't know which way you're cycling? But you could try the cycle route that goes down Portland Street/Brandon Street which comes off Albany Road and runs paralell-ish with Oxley Close. This one is ok. There tend to be quite a few people around on foot and by car as there is a pub, a takeaway and large car park, along with lots of cyclists. Also the layout has been improved recently to make it slightly safer for cyclists.

Yowzer, sorry to hear that, and hope you're okay.


I go through there every day, and I've had to stop a couple of times, once with having a puncture and (last week) someone I was cycling behind got a puncture. I stopped to make sure he was kitted up, but didn't think to stop longer for these reasons.


On the route I normally come from (canal then Glengall Road) there are usually quite a few cyclists together after being released by the traffic lights over the Old Kent Road - a few cyclists together is a good deterrent. Coming home in the dark seems dodgier.


Maybe if people are reading this then they (especially big ugly geezers like me) could make the effort to hook up briefly with lone cyclists, and ride in convoy through the 'dodgy' bits'.

http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=532750&y=178250&z=110&sv=532750,178250&st=4&ar=N&mapp=newmap.srf&searchp=newsearch.srf&lm=0


If you look on this bit of Street Map, Portland Street/Brandon Street is in the very middle squares. Portland Street/Brandon Street is on the other side of Old Kent Road to Oxley Close. It brings you out on a cycle track which runs along the pavement on Old Kent Road. It's quite a useful way of getting to the cycle route that goes around E & C and then on to Waterloo, Blackfriars, Southwark or London Bridge.


Hope this clarifies! It's quite hard to describe.

Ratprincess


Thanks for that, it looks like a better route. I think after dark I'll stick to main roads (around E&C) from now on. It's a shame that we have to. Old Kent Road is so wide you'd think they could stick a separate cycle route along it, where people couldn't park. It would be easier to put a cycle route there than it would on Walworth Road. Perhaps we ought to be campaigning for more of these. If there IS an existing campaign I'd love to get involved.


Thanks everyone too for the kind concern and responses. I'm completely fine - no lasting physical or mental damage. Just had a sore kidney for a bit. But I still have my beautiful bike, and I WILL be investing in a helmet now...

Really sorry to hear this and I'm glad you're OK. I used to use that route too, sometimes after dark, but was put off by a group of youths who sometimes hung around by that square (this was a couple of years ago) and it just felt quite threatening. Now I prefer to take my chances on the Walworth Rd. Buses or not, it's always well lit and there are plenty of people around going about their business. I hardly ever use cycle routes now. The other thing that bugs me about them is that so many of them go along quite poorly maintained roads and you're so shaken up by the end of your journey with all the potholes and whatnot!

I lived there for a while, in the square behind it, and it seemed OK to me, I'm guessing it's what you're familiar with and what experience you have.


Thinking on on that though would you automatically trust someone else to escort you through the area just because they're on a bike? That's making a few assumptions based on a bit of commonality I'd say.

I have been cycling this route to work all through the summer, but now that it is dark on my return this part of the journey does make me nervous. It is particularly dark just there and having to go between the barriers does make you slow down, losing the reassuring sense that someone wouldn't stop you if you are travelling at speed. When I was mugged on my bicycle it was at a point where I had to slow right down. This was many years ago, but the thought never really leaves you. I know the anger you feel after an incident like this.

Since reading this post I've decided to divert and go further down Dunton Road and pick up Mandela Way. The only donwside to doing this is the wait at the traffic lights. but at least it is more populated and better lit.

Thanks for the warning, hope you're ok. I must say, I stick to well lit - wide open routes at all times, even if it means going the extra mile. I think a lot of cyclists have a false sense of security when they're on a bicycle... My rule of thumb is: Don't cycle where you wouldn't walk...
Clinker, that's a good rule of thumb. It's true, you can feel quite powerful on a bicycle, because of the height, speed, etc. But of course it's false, and if you're pushed off it puts you in such a vulnerable position - it's really disorientating and just coming off alone can leave you with injuries enough, and you're hardly in a position to get up and try and defend yourself. I refuse to be put off cycling because I adore it, but I'll always stick to that rule of thumb now, religiously.

I'm really sorry to hear about the experience, and I ride there a few days a week.


The concerns should be raised with the london Cycling Campaign, the Mayor's office and again, as a group, with the police. The solution isn't for us to cower and join the horrificness of cycling in between buses and speeding motorbikes on the Old Kent Road, where personally, I feel particularly unsafe, but to ensure that the quiet cycle routes are made safer.


That being said, you're pretty much vulnerable everywhere. I know of someone who was mugged on Portland street on his bike; and someone else who was pushed over and mugged in broad daylight on the Wandsworth road roundabout. I usually lock my panier to my rack, so that it can't be removed at a traffic light.


Anyone fancy putting a letter together that we can all send off to the various sources?

Yowch - sorry to hear about your experience Carol, glad you didn't lose the bike (and, more importantly, that you're OK!)


I was attacked cycling across Burgess Park after dark a couple of years ago. Two guys swung a scaffold pole at my face and tried to steal my bike. I think it's only because I was "clipped in", wearing shoes with cleats that attach to my pedals, that I didn't come off the bike immediately and rolled into a better-lit section of path, where they didn't chase me. It wasn't a pleasant experience and I needed a bit of surgery to put my nose back together. After that I kept to the roads: I'd rather be able to see the dangers I face when cycling!


I guess that sh*t happens, people with ill intent can be anywhere and even in places other people have cycled happily for years one may still get attacked, but I hope this story makes everyone a bit more aware when they're riding. Wishing you a swift recovery Carol!


: P

Thanks for posting this thread, I have changed my route slightly as a result, although never seen any hint of trouble, mind you I cycle slightly out of rush hour. I have to say the worst part of route 22 has to be Willow Road - devoid of flat tarmac and terribly lit.

not quite random:


A CAR fanatic who murdered a thief for ripping the stereo from his prized BMW was jailed for life yesterday.


Darren Lynch tracked down junkie Mark Biggs, 39, and plunged a 10in knife into his heart. He died in his sister's arms.


Judge Richard Hone QC, told Lynch, 33, at the Old Bailey: "You intended serious harm and were quite indifferent as to whether death resulted."


Builder Lynch admitted murder. His stepdad saw Mr Biggs break into his BMW in Camberwell, South East London, take the stereo and gifts for Lynch's daughters.


Lynch raced round on his bike for an hour and spotted Mr Biggs. He said: "I'm going to kill him," before stabbing him. A witness heard him say: "You took my stereo." He was caught on CCTV.


Mirror

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would have thought Oru/ Trinco would be noisy… certainly is at mid afternoon. Do let us know when you have been what is was like and where you finally settled on.sure we are all interested  as your requirements are quite specific and good to know or have reviews on places, especially from you with different needs and requirements. Actually, given the numbers involved and as you say a special occasion, assuming £20/30  head, you really should have a chat with Suzanne. Maybe your kids could chip in a bit more as they are working.. You could always provide a cake yourself for after. Her food is special and well cooked.. know what you are getting..!    Italian place is also good as well and would cater for your needs except of  course the toilet aspect which is a steep climb down stairs… even I struggle. Yes, , know you are not a fan of Vietnamese place after tea incident… Owner now does all the cooking and so nice and accommodating but you won’t go there.. Wish she got more support… had a bereavement recently…       
    • Depends on your definition of idiot.  I use the term to describe someone of low intellectual capacity.  But understand that this is now not used as seen to be offensive. In that respect he makes decisions that are good for him, and his close followers.  Whether they are in the interests of the US that is open to debate (in the same way that history will debate all major leaders eg was Thatcher/Reagan good for the UK/US). On line definitions: An idiot is most commonly a term for a stupid, foolish, or senseless person, often used as an insult or to express frustration with someone's silly behavior, but historically it was a clinical term for profound intellectual disability, which is now considered offensive and obsolete. The word comes from Greek roots meaning a "private person" or layman, evolving to signify ignorance and lack of skill before becoming a derogatory label for low mental capacity.  Modern Usage Self-deprecation: Used to describe one's own silly mistakes ("I felt like an idiot when I tripped").  Insult/Exclamation: A very foolish person or someone acting stupidly ("Don't be such an idiot!").  Historical/Obsolete Meaning Medical Classification: Once a technical term for someone with extreme intellectual disability (IQ below 25), a usage now rejected as offensive.  Origin Greek (idiōtēs😞 A private citizen, layman, or someone lacking professional knowledge. Latin (idiota😞 An uneducated or ignorant person.  The notable recent  'idiot' was Johnson who of course played the fool (lovable rogue) but that served him well So ultimately not a good word as it can be used in many ways. Ignorant is another good example - can be stupid, unaware, or simply rude.
    • Are you still needing this?
    • I couldn’t disagree more - Trump is an idiot and he was voted for by a combination of idiots, racists and arrogance  you can complain about weak opponents all you like - but when the alternative is a “strong” thug then the problem is those who favour the thug.  All we face was predicted  - and he doesn’t have widespread support across many parts of America. So that leaves parts of America responsible for this  oh and in the list of things you call him you forgot the bit about being a p(that’s enough! Ed)  Vance might be worse in many ways - but he doesn’t have the “glam” that Trump has. Once Trump is exposed properly or dies, nowhere near as many people will vote for his successor see also his embarrassing fanboy: Farage 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...