Jump to content

Locksmith East Dulwich - Beware


joseba

Recommended Posts

I've had the adventurous experience to call "Locksmiths East Dulwich" (aka samlocks) to open a straight-forward rear door (http://www.locksmitheastdulwich.co.uk/, http://www.samlocksmithdulwich.co.uk/, 020 8099 7991)


Over the phone they quoted ?59 for opening a 5 lever lock and ?29 for a replacement lock.


After arriving late, lots of drilling and lots of hammering the door was open. You would be forgiven to think they'd be paid by noise.


Then there was the question of payment. With indignation he stated "I can't do the lock for ?29. I paid ?35 for that at Selco." Well, I don't know Selco prices as you need a trade login (can anyone check?) but at Amazon that lock is ?12.


Also he put in a 3 lever lock with the justification that the 5 lever lock would be bigger. Really?


Eventually after threats to remove the lock and lots of discussions we finally came back to the original price.


All in all I can highly recommend this locksmith to anyone who hates their door and wishes to hone their negotiations skills and intimidation resilience. To everyone else ...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/45194-locksmith-east-dulwich-beware/
Share on other sites

I sympathise with you. Can't remember the name of the asshat but we got charged some 150 quid to be let back into the house at 2 am on a rainy night with a pregnant wife. Hardly time to argue but the ass had the cheek to ask to come back the next day for more money to fit in new locks. Was happy to finish the job myself new locks from B&Q and following the instructions and watching a couple of tutorials on youtube.


Now that three parent babies are just round the corner I dread to know what the offspring of an egg from a lawyer, female nucleus from a dentist and sperm from a locksmith would grow up to be. A UKIP MEP probably.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I think this story will run a bit - Labour HQ has said she went because "further details have come to light". Which is political speak for "what is about to come to light was not something we were aware of so don't blame us". i.e. casting her adrift politically and suggesting she did not tell them the full story to cover their own backs. Clearly the police must have thought something unusual was happening to charge her with that - we will probably find out over the weekend.   The problem is when you preach that "we're not like them" and then you act like them then it makes you look like hypocrites. In isolation this could be managed but it's another example of Labour saying one thing and doing another - Cash for Access, the clothing debacle, MP punching constituents etc etc etc. It casts all politicians in a bad light.
    • Now it can be true that it will be easy to find people who believe either of those things, that doesn't make both those things true  Objectively - a situation is handled very differently by two different governments. If some people decide to say "proof they are all the same" then we should be pointing out that that is wrong - not hand waving it away as something that people can choose to believe or not believe If the people who want to believe "they are all the same" have some better idea - eg Reform? - then they will have to have to explain how that party is packed with criminals so how does that improve things. "They are all the same" is usually code for "I don't really want to think about anything, I just want what I want" that, and whilst I find him infuriating in many matters, I can't see Starmer of all people reversing this decision. 
    • That was certainly par for the course under the previous Gov, but Labour has a lot of very keen/ambitious MPs so I think she'll probably have to wait her turn...
    • What's the bet Louise Haigh will re-enter the cabinet at the next reshuffle?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...