Jump to content

WARNING: Large scale cyber attack will hit in 2 weeks, be prepared!!!


Recommended Posts

I use Carbonite, which automatically backs up both my laptop and my external hard drive (permanently connected to the laptop). You can get a free trial before committing to it.


http://www.carbonite.com/online-backup/free-trial?catid=200200&mkwid=svffKeNjk|dc&adnumber=38157719581&cm_mmc=ppc-_-google-_-38157719581-_-svffKeNjk&c3apimn=vffKeNjk&gclid=CjkKEQjwqsCcBRDt7_Gts5a91YYBEiQAm-wYEZ3RN3Ncd1k1JBU5DU_tsMnigZutPvqG4pzV1UDntunw_wcB


But there are many similar services.


It's worth it just for peace of mind in my opinion.

Storage costs are constantly plummeting, but if it's literally backups you'd be daft to use external hard drives, when something like blu-ray will be a fraction of the cost, physical size and will be much safer.


You could avoid all those moving pieces by using SS drives, but again...for backup...really?

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Storage costs are constantly plummeting, but if

> it's literally backups you'd be daft to use

> external hard drives, when something like blu-ray

> will be a fraction of the cost, physical size and

> will be much safer.

>

> You could avoid all those moving pieces by using

> SS drives, but again...for backup...really?


xxxxxxx


My external hard drive is not for back-up - I don't need back-up as I'm using Carbonite, and in any case I wouldn't want to rely for back-up solely on something which could fail or be damaged.


It's for additional storage, because my ancient laptop only has an 80gb hard drive, and as I've had the external hard drive for some years, I don't particularly want to shell out money on something else when it is doing the job perfectly well.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Storage costs are constantly plummeting, but if it's literally backups you'd be daft to use

> external hard drives, when something like blu-ray will be a fraction of the cost, physical size and

> will be much safer.


Blu-ray holds max 50GB per disk, so I'd have to chop my half-TB into a whole bunch of disks, which is a time consuming task. Alternately, I can pick up a 2TB external drive for ?50 and cycle multiple backups on it.


Plus, as I don't have a blu-ray writer, so I'd have to buy one.

Of course i have a couple of external harddrives, but for all my old photos and backups of music, some discs you can tuck quietly away is just easier.


The odd hour once every few months is really all it takes.


But i get the barrier to entry thing.

Yeah, 50gb disks don't do it for me either, but that may change in the future. DVDs and other optical discs eventually succumb to disk rot. That's why I never use them for back-ups or storage anymore. They just don't last forever.


So I use high quality drives and seek to transfer the data to a new drive every five years. And would consider using an online storage option as a backup to that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...