Jump to content

Cleaner recommendation - A gem for someone


New2ED

Recommended Posts

Hi


I just wanted to recommend my cleaner of 3 years, and she's got a spot that has become available in her schedule due to people moving away. She really is a gem to snap up!


She has one space on Wednesdays, fortnightly for 2-3hours, for anyone in the Underhill road area, or towards Peckham rye station.


I've recommended her in the past on here, and everyone's been really happy. She also works for 2 of my friends, and neighbour and they're thrilled with her too.


She is Bulgarian and while her english is limited, you can still have conversation, but she is lovely, incredibly polite and honest, reliable and is such a hard worker, and consistently leaves the house sparkling and spotless each week.


I have a 3 bed house and have her for 3 hours each week, and she is so reliable, she does ironing and finds extra tasks to do that I don't expect - I'm not sure how she fits so much in.


I pay her ?10 / hr, and find her very good value for money.


If you want to chat to me about her I'll happily provide a reference over the phone. It would be helpful if you could send me a PM with your road name and how many hours you'd need her for each fortnight (and any questions you have!).

Thanks

Rachael

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...