Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Went to see last night with MrClive3300, was slightly nervous that I wasnt going to love it because it was supposedly too action. However I thought it was great and how hot is Olga? My only comment was that i was feeling a bit car sick with some of the jerky filming, but apparently thats all part of the film according to husbie
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4489-new-james-bond-thoughts/
Share on other sites

I really enjoyed the new Bourne film, it does what it says on the tin; the names Bourne, James Bourne.


http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TMoJRLStD9c


It has lost some of the classic charm, but then catching the dreadful Die Another Day the other day, it's not a wholly bad thing.

Saw it last night - lots of action but the story line is impossible to follow. In one sequence Bond flies to Austria, spies on some people, has a few fights, kills the bodyguard to the Prime Minister's key advisor and is next seen driving a motor launch toward an Italian villa set on the coast somewhere. No explanations.


I think it was about a nasty secretive organisation called Quantum (SMERSH for 21st century?) who were down to corner the South American water market. A plot was foiled, JB managed to avenge the death of Vespa, masses of car chases, gun fights, explosions but low on logic - there was no neat ending and so many loose ends you could have woven a new hairpiece for Sean Connery.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saw it last night - lots of action but the story

> line is impossible to follow. In one sequence Bond

> flies to Austria, spies on some people, has a few

> fights, kills the bodyguard to the Prime

> Minister's key advisor and is next seen driving a

> motor launch toward an Italian villa set on the

> coast somewhere. No explanations.

>

> I think it was about a nasty secretive

> organisation called Quantum (SMERSH for 21st

> century?) who were down to corner the South

> American water market. A plot was foiled, JB

> managed to avenge the death of Vespa, masses of

> car chases, gun fights, explosions but low on

> logic - there was no neat ending and so many loose

> ends you could have woven a new hairpiece for Sean

> Connery.


You mean he got the girl and killed the villain? Talk about spoilers, MM. How inconsiderate.

I saw it last night night and despite my low expectations, I actually quite enjoyed it. I thought the plot was fairly linear, but the scenes did jump around quite a bit. I didn't find it particularly hard to follow though. It's lost some of the original charm of the older films, but the action scenes were superb, if a little over-engineered at times. Not the best Bond, but definitely worth seeing on the big screen.


How many placement advertisements did everyone count? I'm sure I'm missing several, but Sony Ericsson, Aston Martin (obviously), Ford Ka, Virgin Atlantic, Redbull.....

Placement has been a feature for a little while, they don't come more blatant than the tank through the Heineken lorry in Goldeneye.


Reminds me of the shootout in Lethal Weapon II to the tune of Bonnie Tyler's 'I need a hero' there's actually a momentary close-up of a bottle of Hero aftershave as it gets hit by a bullet. Shocking or genius, you decide.

Product placement has always been a part of the Bond novels and films, but I think it has certainly become more noticable in recent films. I went last night and enjoyed it, but I agree with EDOldie, that Casino Royale was a very tough act to follow. Well worth a watch in the cinema Bon3yard, I implore you not to wait for the DVD! Certainly a much better film that any of the Bourne films in my opinion.

Stop it. My hand shook as I clicked on this thread. I thought Daniel Craig had resigned. First David Tennant and now DC. We've barely seen his abs and, poof, gone already. I had a tear in my eye. Please choose your thread names with more care in future Mrs Clive.


Going for a sit down.

Sorry Giggirl - have just re-read the title and agree it would be shocking as we have really not seen must of his abs. Sadly as well in the new film, there's not a trunk scene in sight. Agree with the product placement comments, very gratutious virgin atlantic advertising... also, cant remember (pregnant brain) if it was in QofS or Goldeneye where a car drove through all the perrier bottles on a truck - what was funny about that was they were in a really really rundown area not likely to selling said product

What I liked best was the villain doing his 'Acting with fruit'

really hilarious. in the last bit. showing his true lack of consideration for the big generallissimo by eating his apple with disdain, then picking his teeth. Really the best bit in the film. other bond villains get cats or bald heads or funny names but this one was acting with fruit.


also liked the other fruit moment which was when the bowl of very red cherries went crashing to the floor mid chase upstairs. nice.


only bit i wasnt sure about was his cardi and shirt combo when he went to visit his crinkly-handsome friend in his villa. Nice shirt, great cardi, but together? Not very bond I dont think.


O and the opening credits with the naked ladies and the sand. close to the bone or what! actually close to the nipple would be more accurate.


I loved it though. perfect multiplex hangover action.

I was led to believe there was no plot and that the content was a load of pish. Speaking of pish, has anyone seen the latest Coen Bros? What an odd film...almost nothig happens in it. Its quite telling(Look away now-SPOILER ALERT)that the only scene I found funny was when Brad Pitts gormless face stares out at Clooney just before he gets capped. Easily the worst Coen bros film yet...yes, even worse than Intolerable Cruelty(Havent seen Ladykillers yet so cant comment).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And the Sainsbury’s own brand chocolate mini rolls have gone from £1.15 to £1.40 overnight, so 22%-ish. I prefer them them to the Cadbury original because they have a lot more chocolate on them, presumably because they’re made in a less advanced factory. I would think that getting the Rizla thin coating of chocolate that Cadbury’s accountants demand onto a piece of sponge is quite a sophisticated operation. Discuss.
    • Another recommendation for Leon. He was able to come out to our electrical elergency within 24 hours of me contacting him. His communication was great and whilst he could not solve our problem, he was able to perform tests to identify this and did so quickly and efficiently. He charging  is very fair and his manner very pleasant. Both of these in contrast to some experiences I have had elsewhere.    happy to put my name to recommending Leon. His number is  07707 925039.
    • Other than acting as 'interested parties' Southwark Councillors have no responsibility for water issues. And no real leverage either. Considering the complete disdain with which Thames Water treats its own Regulator, and the government, (let alone its customers) I doubt very much whether an entire battalion of councillors would have much impact. What powers could they exercise?
    • That may not be so - many on this site are experts in many areas - you yourself claim huge traffic management (or similar) expertise for instance. And I think you will find that Southwark employees are unlikely to support criticism or challenges to Southwark policy - why, you don't and you apparently neither live in, or vote in, the borough. Do you, however, work for it, as you are such a cheerleader? If not, then you are the most passionate disinterested person on this site, as regards so many aspects, not just traffic.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...