Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh and back on FPS. Unreal Tournament was great fun. A group of us used to go to a LAN gaming bar called Playing Fields for a bit of UT goodness. Good times. Golden Axe was something I used to play in the arcades of Mablethorpe. My parents would give me a stack of 10ps and that would be me happy for an hour. I could stretch 10p out on Double Dragon for quite a while. Then at various points: Willow, Strider, Toobin, Bubble Bobble and many more.
Dragon 32. Not great for me I'm afraid. My mother insisted on getting one instead of a Spectrum, she was a secretary and insisted on having a proper keyboard [much later we got a Spectrum 128]. I remember playing Calixto Island. Brtual. It was basically game of guess the exact string that the programmers expect you to enter to get to the next part.

One that I remember well was called (I'm 99% sure) Terminus (not the 2000 game). You basically had to make your way through this space station/ship through crushers and lasers and stuff, It was just one long (for those days) game with no levels.


What was cool about it especially back then was that you had 4 different robots you could be (and you'd work your way through them til all 4 were dead and it was GAME OVER) they all had different abilities.


Can find absolutely no mention of it anywhere, but I played that a fair bit when I was probably about 8.


It was so cool being able to go to the local newsagent and buy a game on cassette for ?1.99 or ?2.99.

Thrust on the beeb (though ported to speccy) was a particular standout, the first (?) of what we'd term physics games these days?


Finely honed gameplay and skill needed rather than just memory, timing and persistence.


Quite an achievement for the hardware.

and talking of groundbreaking games, Zarch on the archimedes (by Elite's dave brabham).

Obviously my mate was the son of a headteacher, i doubt normal people had an Archimedes.


Can anyone remember a game, on the speccy i think, where you basically had to try and maintain world peace and react to events to try and limit nuclear races and eventually wars which acted out as little pixels pinging around the planet, usually getting through your star wars defences?


My memory of it was that it was awesome, but can't remember a name for the life of me.


of course the dangers of nostalgia. i remeber this strategy game being amazing, its kind of unplayable now

http://www.80stopgames.com/site/node/1993

This thread is a nerd fest but fun.


I'm not sure why but games back 80's then seemed to have more atmosphere than the ultra-real stuff today - anyone know why?


Second thing was how tribal it was. You were either a Spectrum, Commodore 64 or Amstrad guy. If you had a Dragon 32 people were bemused/curious/took pity. If you had a BBC Micro or Acorn Electron you were a geek and your parents had thought about "schooling" way too much...

yeah, that last one sums my parents up nicely.


Still we had elite, and....erm.....and frak?


As for the atmosphere i guess two things, one we were young and our imaginations were wayyyyyy better as kids, and two, games these days do all that for you, they're so pretty and realistic it doesn't leave you anything to do, and they definitely lose something in that.


Elite, or x-wing still fizz my bunghole more than Eve online or Wingcommander.


Though Homeworld was pretty special, and actually a little bit excited about Elite Dangerous

This vid has brought back some great memories, from Turrican 2, to Rainbow Islands, to Dizzy, to Operation Wold (early FPS), Final Fight, Continental Racing, Bombjack, Paperboy, Robocop, Yi Ar Kung Fu...


Amstrad was often dissed as beneath the C64 / Speccy, but I loved it.



Oooo, Chase HQ was another one.


Okay, so after you'd started playing Megadrive / SNES, the 8bit stuff looked shit, but I loved this stuff as a kid and thought the graphics were amazing!


 

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As for the atmosphere i guess two things, one we

> were young and our imaginations were wayyyyyy

> better as kids, and two, games these days do all

> that for you, they're so pretty and realistic it

> doesn't leave you anything to do, and they

> definitely lose something in that.

>


This is why I still firmly believe that Sensible Soccer or Kick Off 2 are far superior to the current football games which are just too realistic.


Then again nostalgia is a powerful force.

Yeah, loved kick off, i think NHLPA '93 was the sport sim i spent most time on. The moment they became actual sims as opposed to top down arcade games, they became pointless, and agree, the same very much goes for footie, i find them tedious in the extreme.


Speedball, now there's a game they should do in real life.


or rollerball of course, loved that film. Thinking about it video games that became films are universally terrible, but that's a film that is really a live action video game!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello! I would be keen to hear from parents of secondary-school age in state schools of the cost of school trips overseas. Particularly interested in Kingsdale and Charter but all examples welcome. many thanks!
    • Or the government have it wrong. Certainly picking a fight with farmers, the very definition of working people, is probably not going to end well. The problem here is that Labour hung their hat on not taxing "working people" which was clearly the output of some awful focus group and clearly not the term they wanted to use. They failed to properly qualify what a working person is and it is now coming back to haunt them because the very definition of a working person is anyone who is, well, working and that covers a whole gamut of people and salaries. Don't pick a fight with farmers if you have stated you aren't going after working people because public opinion will be against you. Farmers are the backbone of any country and work so hard and yes, there are some that are incredibly well off but the majority are not and farming is a trade that gets handed down through the generations. And farmers will make their case very public in ways other groups won't.   Labour's communication has been awful but they got a free pass before the election because everyone was so focused on how awful the Tories were. But now they are in power and they are tripping themselves up because in leadership you need more than soundbites.   The "Son of a Toolmaker" is the type of thing that haunts politicians until the end of their career. Clearly someone decided to detach Keir from his grammar school, university (including Oxford), legal career, knight of the realm background. His face when everyone laughed when he mentioned it during one of the pre-election debates was a picture. He is the son of a toolmaker but you look a bit silly when people then say yes but your dad ran a tool-making company...   Coming into power on a ticket of "look how they have been behaving" and then behaving in many ways the Tories were has been a disaster for politicians of all parties. The clothing funding and access to no.10 was just a nightmare for them and in these days where today's newspaper is no longer tomorrow's chip paper the comments made about Trump (which I am sure most people can agree with) are just embarrassing.   Winter Fuel Tax has been a disaster. Yes, there are many pensioners who don't need it but those aren't going to be the ones talking to the media about how awful the winter is going to be and people only remember those shouting the loudest.   The budget was an interesting one. I was watching Theo Pathitis on TV and he had swung from the Tories to Labour ahead of the election and was talking about the impact of the Employer NI and you could tell that he was very carefully choosing his words as he knew how hard this was going to be on business and what the implications are but clearly didn't want to be left with egg on his face as he was telling everyone to vote Labour ahead of the election.   Labour were, understandably, happy to right the massive wave of Tory discontent and pre-election all of the world's ills were down to the Tories. The first speech Starmer gave after winning spoke nothing about the previous government but everything about global challenges that were going to make it tough. The challenge for Labour is they convinced people that every problem was down to the Tories and that removing them would solve everything but things are not as straight forward as that. I senses things changing when they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises. Labour are finding out, to their cost, that being in opposition is easy. Being in power is not.          
    • Adsl over copper is not obsolete, these are lines that are fed on exchange only and are still being installed now and will be for foreseeable, they are being changed to sotap which is basically no dial tone and will be voice over internet 
    • Russia is the aggressor.they did have a second rate army most of it gone.why is putin so deluded .in that Russia can use chinese  Iranian  north Korean missiles drones to attack unkraine civilians city's energy facilties.they have escalated the war  by using north Korean soldiers in combat.but putting saids you are not allowed to fight back using other country's weapons in Russia long range missiles.unkraine have proved they are no push over.give them all the long range missiles they want to hit in side Russia hard .
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...