Jump to content

Recommended Posts

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I wouldn't want Suarez at west ham, not that BFS

> would have the faintest idea what to do with him,


Easy. Play him wide on the left to float balls in for Carroll. B)


The biting, red card and Balotelli high-hurdles apart the whole game was an illustration of the nastier cynical side of football that some people have been suggesting England need to adopt more. Italy and Uruguay, when not committing sneaky little fouls, were falling to the ground in operatic displays of agony. Even before Suarez it was a shitty game.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Some ex player (I think it might have been

> Ballack) was recently quoted as saying "Italian,

> Dutch, German teams know how they want to play,

> but England don't". I don't think he was

> referring to particular teams, or teams under

> particular coaches, but speaking more generally,

> and I think he has a point.

>

> I recently read that Robben, RVP and Sneijder

> played together in Dutch youth teams from their

> early teens, and although they then played at

> loads of different clubs in lots of different

> countries they don't have a problem playing 'Dutch

> style' for the national team. The Spanish were

> successful when they basically adopted the

> Barcelona style, regardless of the personnel, and

> I also recently read that Belgium credit a fair

> amount of their recent success to the fact that

> some years ago the national coach basically

> insisted that all Belgian club academy teams

> should play 433. Joachim Low tweaked the

> traditional German style but he had a basic style

> that all the players understood to start from.

>

> England don't have their own set way of playing

> that all the players understand, partly because

> the traditional England approach was more about

> attitude than tactical nous (or at best it was

> standard, boring 442), and partly because

> Premiership clubs mostly have foreign managers and

> foreign players who are constantly changing, so no

> consistency.

>

> If we want to do better we need a coach who is

> prepared to define a tactical approach and pick

> the players to fit the system. The best players

> will be able to adapt.



What we need, and I've said it many times before, is a complete culture change a new mind set, and more money and resources dedicated to grass roots level football coupled with a focus on getting kids to learn about touch, technique, skill and reading the game. Too often the cry heard while standing on the touch line at kids 7 aside games is "get stuck in", as soon asI hear that, I walk away. It's as if we determined NOT to evolve and to extract all elements of enjoyment from the game at a very early stage. What do we expect from those kids as they grow up, the new crop of Ronaldos, Henry's, Van Bastens, Bergkamps et al. Fat chance. Until there is a radical shake up and the fat cats of the prem filter some money to where its most needed, it will be the same old same old.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did Netherlands used to be referred to as Holland

> on British telly?


The country is called the Netherlands officially.

Holland is actually only the name for two of the twelve provinces in the country (North Holland and South Holland). However it is frequently used abroad to refer to the country as a whole (and even some Dutch people use it e.g on football scarfs, flags etc)


DulwichFox

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> StraferJack Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----


> Not all Liverpool fans think

> it's just a silly thing to brush aside. That's 3

> times he's biten an opponent. The guy is clearly

> deranged.




I never said it was a silly thing to brush aside, and I've said several times he has a screw lose.


But as Miga says, it's more weird than most things. There are plenty of cheats in this WC. Players diving, little slaps, elbows, I've already lost count of the times I've heard "he's got away with that". But biting is creepy.


But I honestly think he barely registers that he's doing it at the time. Which DOES NOT EXCUSE IT BEFORE YOU JUMP DOWN MY THROAT but that he's just wired wrong.






But all that aside, the fact remains that Fifa has never extended a ban for a non drugs-related incident to domestic football, and I don't think that should change, whatever Alan bloody Shearer thinks.

I agree that it should just be an international ban as that would be consistant with what happens normally. It's a shame that the likely scenario is that Suarez will miss the rest of the WC as he is a class player. What he did was just plain weird and suggests he needs help but it didn't annoy me personally as much as players play acting that they are injured. However you classify what Suarez did, it could hardly be called cheating.

So is there anything about a repeat biter in public that would warn us ?


I'm sounding like Danny mills now saying "lock him up ". I don't mean to do that. But it's not behaviour we should just shrug off either. Any human repeatedly biting other humans.... It's not normal behaviour! Something is clearly wrong

Why? I don't think it had ever happened in the ring before. I know of no other biter in football. There is no difference. In fact I'd say it is even more shocking on a football pitch than inside a ring where two people exchange blows for sport.


Good article, SJ. Obviously, an over indulged spoilt child. The Uruguayan authorities aren't helping him by their attitude.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That's what I said wasn't it?


No it wasn't.


Derek did that outside of the ring though didn't he? Tyson bit Lennox Lewis outside the ring too but none of them did it three times on a football pitch.


Shall we change the subject? I'm getting a bit bored of it all now. That France v Ecaudor game was shit tonight. Should of watched the other match. All the goals seemed to be going in there.... blah blah blah....zzzzzzzzzzzzz

I said


"Just that it's less surprising (if still very shocking) in that arena than on a football pitch."


You said


" In fact I'd say it is even more shocking on a football pitch than inside a ring where two people exchange blows for sport."



Which is basically the same point.


But yes, more than happy to change the subject. We'll know by tomorrow what the outcome is anyway...

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With Suarez it's the repeated offending otherwise

> in this context only then 2 matches.



FIFA have said today that they are entitled to take prior conduct into consideration so the ban may be severe.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...