Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I obviously watched a different game. I thought we were by and large ok, just lacking any 'world class' players who can unlock a game. Rooney sure as hell isn't that as he missed a sitter and scored a tap-in.


Seems ironic that we played better than in any of the last four or five tournaments but won't scrape through for a ritual humiliation like we did in those.


The last of the golden generation was at fault for much of our shiutness, i've no idea why any would ever let Gerrard have honour of wearing the England shirt.


Quids has it, we're a second string team without any special talents coming through. But we've some players who play well and are hungry. Better organisation, a little bit less ball watching and we can do ok, but without restructuring the doemstic game we'll never challenge again.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I feel sorry for Gerrard right now, and not

> because I support Liverpool.


I don't. England should put him out of his misery. As I have said many times recently hes massively overrated and definitely not a leader. Saying the things that you think a leader should say does not make you a leader.



On the other side of the coin I enjoyed watching england this world cup.


Why take Stirling off, he was quiet for a while but the Uruguay manager must have breathed a sigh of relief at that point.


Why were the two England centre half players each beaten by a drifting cross for the Balotelli and Suarez goals ?

England result ?


Being a Millwall supporter I am used to watching a team that 'Played Well' and came second.


Problem is that both teams have Poke and Hope heros seeking the Glory of the one that counted.

Instead of passing the ball to someone in a better position to actually score, their selfish behaviour

is responsible for the inevitable outcome.


DulwichFox

"Why take Stirling off, he was quiet for a while but the Uruguay manager must have breathed a sigh of relief at that point."


My reaction too, especially as Sturridge had done little but pass meekly to the keeper over and over (yeah a little unfair but his finishing was woeful).

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe I saw a different game to most and the

> papers.

>

> But I saw a game in which one team were far better

> than the other; If England had scored again, Italy

> would have got another, I think they beat us in

> their stride without too much exertion.

>

> I agree it was a far more positive approach and an

> entertaining game but we looked like a say,

> Switzerland, in terms of the gap between us and

> Italy. Happy to eat my words but I think we'll not

> make it out of the group and not get a win. That

> we have no world class players is abundantly clear

> but Barkley and Striling have potential to get

> there.

>

> Just an embarrassment in terms of our standing

> rather than the actual performance.

>

> Rooney drop him and Gerrard not that great either.

> I can't wait for the golden generation to pass!



Wot he said - we've gone from dull drawers to more exciting losers...we are miles behind the top teams, miles.


and I am pretty sure Italy and Urugauay aren't in the top teams either....

That rather sums it up, defence was patchy and they had the class to cruelly expose it when they needed, and our final ball, shots were just lacking throughout.

But it was progress, and I'd rather that than the depressing meek displays of the golden generation.

oh the irony - I wait years for an england team I can get behind and the few golden generation players remaining are the reason they are out


That team talk from Gerrard in the papers yesterday was awful I thought - exactly the kind of baggage the new players don't need.


That said, as a person I feel for SG - what a mare of a few months he has had


But I can definitely see progress and am looking forward to Euros


People judge group games too harshly - the glory memories of 1990 mask a woeful group performance

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sterling should never have come off.

>

> Agree that this should be the end for Gerrard and

> England but to blame it all on him is bullshit and

> to say he is not a leader, also bullshit.



Agreed, most of the team apart from Sterling,and even he was only better than avergae, weren't good enough.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "errrr, except when you don't make it out the

> group!!"

>

> obviously - but them's fine lines. And not always

> the best team on right side of those lines



In 1990 we were cautious and conservative at the group games so people thought it was a bit dire but as we could have won all 3 games, if my faded memory serves me right. The Irealndn game was almost like a derby with most players knowing each other; Holland is Holland; Can't remeber the Egypt(?) score was it a draw or win...was it Egypt?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...