Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Apologies if not directly related to East Dulwich, but I think that a lot of parents whose children go to Fairlawn Nursery may use this forum.


If your child is continuing at Fairlawn Nursery or starting in September 2014, you should have received a letter regarding a proposed change in their schedule offering.


It may be that these changes are fine with you, BUT, if you disagree with or are adversely affected by the proposals, please do write to the Head of School (Hania Ryans) to voice your objections.


The letter says it is a consultation with parents, but there is no option to disagree with the change!



thank you




Cross posted to SE23 forum.

We have written a couple of drafts so far: our daughter started earlier this year and has done 1 1/2 terms of 5, there are a number of things we are unhappy with - the morning hours are challenging with no time for settling in & a drop off at another school required at 9am, no full day in preparation for longer school days in reception, the lack of 'consultation' or alternatives to the 5 morning/afternoon pw and finally the letter about longstanding personnel changes that came out on Friday.


My elder child thrived but I was already concerned younger child would out grow the nursery setting and not get the full growth/simulation she requires over 5 terms and half days only raises this more.


Keen to hear more from parents in a similar situation.

Hi trevnsarah


Yes, my situation is very similar to yours: the morning times would make it impossible to get my older son to his school, the afternoon times make it impossible to fetch my younger son on time. Besides the lack of actual consultation, the notice has come very late in the school year. I had been on another nursery waiting list (just laziness, forgot to take my son's name off), and was recently offered a place, but refused it because he'd settled so well at Fairlawn.


katgod,

the current offering at the nursery is 4 half days (2.5 hours a day, am or pm), and 1 full day). The proposal is to switch to half days only (3 hours). As trevnsarah noted, a full day is a great preparation for reception. And the morning and afternoon kids get to mix with each other in a slightly less familiar environment. Plus I assume that parents have organised their work hours with the full day in mind.

I would say that the reasons given in their letter for the change are not clear.

I am going to write to Ms Ryans too. I thought very carefully about nurseries as not only does it have to be a good, caring nursery, which Fairlawn is, but I have to make it fit in with my older child (who I will no longer be able to drop off) and with mine and my partners working hours. I would have chosen another nursery altogether had these hours been proposed before we started. I have been really happy with the nursery provision but now I'm not beginning to see why Fairlawn gets such bad ratings on the parent view part of Ofsted.
I am personally pleased with a change to 3 hrs a day as the old set up seemed too short with only 2.5hrs and the full day disproportionately long. Also making packed lunch is a pain. However, I know what a nightmare logistics and working can be so from that point of view it is short notice.

I am just in the middle of writing a letter. I am really annoyed that this is being implemented after offer letters (1 full day & four half days) have already gone out and without proper consultation (the letter is not asking for thoughts, we are being asked to choose a time). A member of staff told me that nursery staff were not even informed about these changes, despite asking before offer letters went out, until the day before the letter from Hania Ryans went out. I think that is very worrying.


My older children are at Horniman and start at 8.50 & I also have a child with SEN which makes it very hard for me to drop off any earlier, I am coming from the opposite direction. I may have made different nursery choices had I been informed.

Just to add, I feel that letting us know this late in the school term is also a very deliberate move, it's being rushed through. This is not the way to introduce a significant change and not to consult parents who were under the impression they were getting different hours is appalling.


Fleurie - I feel the same, the nursery is brilliant with really great staff. I was astonished to find out that even they were kept in the dark. This to me shows complete disregard for them too as well as the parents. It is not right to do something like this without any sort of warning. If this is proposed then that's what it should be within a more reasonable timescale. They should carry out proper consultation and parents should be made aware way ahead of the proposed implementation.


I have also cc'd my letter to the chair if governors, Robyn Fairman.

My partner and I viewed this nursery and loved it but ultimately decided not to take the place offered to our daughter because the hours were not workable. During the tour of the nursery the staff member who showed us around mentioned that they were considering changing the hours as they had been unable to fill all available spaces the previous year and had therefore received less government funding. They were interested in understanding what hours would be more amenable to families with two working parents. I was surprised when we received the offer letter and the hours listed were unchanged from previous years and now very surprised to learn that they've changed the hours with apparently no consultation process. The new hours on offer certainly are not favourable to the working parents in this household and it appears not favourable to working parents in most households. It's a shame it appears they didn't bother to ask anyone before making this change, particularly after offer letters went out, but this seems consistent with the quality of nursery management I've endured to date. It would be amazing if in addition to quality childcare a nursery could possess even a tinge of business acumen.
what are the new proposed change in hours? we viewed the nursery about a month ago for possible start in 2015, so would be great to know what new hours are. We also have a older daugther starting reception in September (at another school but on waiting list for Fairlawn).

Hi,

just to update those who are unaware: received a letter from Ms Ryans saying that the hours will remain unchanged for children continuing / starting September 2014. I.e. 2.5 hours 4 days a week, 1 full day.


For September 2015, discussions will be opened with those parents affected regarding any changes to the times.


Very relieved, as my son loves the nursery!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...