Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This makes interesting reading: a third of first-time mothers suffer depressive symptoms:

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/may/21/third-of-new-mothers-suffer-depressive-symptoms

And particularly this bit:

'And more women are depressed when their child turns four than at any time before that, according to the study, which challenges the notion that mothers' birth-related mental struggles usually happen at or after the baby's arrival. The findings have led to calls for all women giving birth in the UK to have their mental health monitored until their child turns five to ensure that more of those experiencing difficulties are identified.'

It is certainly an interesting read and from my experience depression and anxiety can be a difficulty well past the postnatal period - and this could be for all sorts of reasons, including changes in lifestyle and work (or becoming a SAHM), changes in the relationship with partners etc. However, in the case of this study I also wonder if they controlled for women having a second child in the four years since they had their first?
Actually I just realised that they did in fact control for this (must have skipped this before) and it showed that women with only one child were more depressed - now that makes me wonder if they controlled for reasons why mum only has one child. Maybe those who have made the decision to have one child are less depressed than those who may have fertility problems?

"Interestingly, women in the study with one child at the time of our 4-year follow-up tended to have

had more relationship transitions, and were more likely to have experienced intimate partner abuse

and a greater number of stressful life events and social health issues in the preceding 12 months.

They were also more likely to have a low income, and to have experienced depression in pregnancy

and the first 12 months postpartum."


That's from the Maternal Health Study policy brief provided by the paper's authors. It's downloadable from https://www.mcri.edu.au/research/research-projects/maternal-health-study-2014/news-and-events/. There's also a video. The paper itself seems not to have reached the BJOG site yet: presumably it'll be in the June issue. When it does it's likely thst non-subscribers will only be able to see the abstract.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://rose-education.org/  for more info on our services and register for our free course funded by the National Lottery The EHCP process can be complex and daunting, but our programme will provide you with the knowledge, confidence, and support you need to get the best possible outcome for your child.   Our programme includes: Group workshops on topics such as applying for an EHCP, preparing for an EHCP assessment, and negotiating an EHCP plan Access to a wealth of resources and information A supportive community of other parents and carers A parent guide with information about EHCPs A5_Flyer_-_Rose_Education (4).pdf
    • The next workshop 28th November from 6:30 pm to 8 pm. two spaces available, send a PM if interested.
    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...