Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


Did anyone see a man running away from Bellenden Road, just near the junction with Choumert Road about 0945, today 14th May? I saw some pretty cowardly behaviour when a skateboarder _on the road_ had an upset and caused a lady on a scooter some pretty nasty damage. Had there been another vehicle around, it could have been much worse.


The guy in question was skateboarding fast down Bellenden, when he sort of "flipped" the skateboard which went flying under the wheels of the lady's scooter who was unlucky enough to be behind him. Fortunately she (the motorcyclist) wasn?t very seriously hurt, but was cut, bruised, and pretty shaken. Unfortunately, the bike however had been damaged, and when she suggested he was liable he said he would provide his name but he wouldn?t pay for the damage. When the motorcyclist got on the phone to the police he ran off. He was in his early 20s, white, reasonably well spoken, about 5?10, with a maroon sweatshirt, and a skateboard with fluorescent yellow top.


Having seen this, I chatted to the lady and heard all of the above, and it turns out that she probably can't claim because she's only got third party insurance. Pretty bad that someone should wind up hurt and out of pocket because of some ones reckless arrogant stupidity, and cowardly behaviour to run off, and not just man up and offer to pay what he could.


Anyway, be careful out there. :-/

pinecone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Pretty bad that someone should

> wind up hurt and out of pocket because of some

> ones reckless arrogant stupidity, and cowardly

> behaviour to run off, and not just man up and

> offer to pay what he could.


Indeed, and if you have their details, there's nothing to stop you suing them for the damage regardless of your insurance.

He shouldn't have been skateboarding on the road. That was an accident waiting to happen. Hopefully the description above is good enough that someone will know or recognise him. More and more road users are now attaching cameras to their vehicles and it's not hard to see why.
A skateboard is not a vehicle. It's completely stupid to use it on a road, especially when vehicles are using that road. Vehicles are required to have insurance. Some cyclists also have insurance (just in case they cause an accident). It's not ok to cause an accident and run off. If a driver does that, it's a criminal offence. He's liable at least for the damage to the scooter.

There is the following bylaw in Southwark....


Skateboarding etc


3. No person shall skate, slide or ride on rollers, skateboards or other self-propelled vehicles on any footway or carriageway in such a manner as to cause danger or give reasonable grounds for annoyance to other persons using the footway or carriageway.

Pokertime - you're right. How dare he ride on the road, he should know his place and it's not holding up upstanding tax-paying motor vehicles. And per your bylaw, he shouldnt have been on the pavement either. Ban skateboards. And bikes. And pedestrians. Then we can have more space for cares and motorbikes to get around safely.


(we can't understand the circumstances from one post, but it sounds like the scooter was too close to the "vehicle" in front and couldnt stop in time when he fell off. Had she been in front and a lorry behind, then I dont think we'd have the same reaction)

All we know for facts is the scooter was behind the skateboard, could have been in the middle of the lane and not directly behind preparing to overtake, anything really. We then know the skateboard "flipped", so could have gone directly backward, sideways, or at any angle between them. We also know the skateboarder wasn't in control of the board.


Not long ago there was a phase when I went past a lad every day, presumably on his way to school, on a unicycle. The situation described by the OP was one I dreaded every day and I sympathise with the scooter rider.

PokerTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is the following bylaw in Southwark....

>

> Skateboarding etc

>

> 3. No person shall skate, slide or ride on

> rollers, skateboards or other self-propelled

> vehicles on any footway or carriageway in such a

> manner as to cause danger or give reasonable

> grounds for annoyance to other persons using the

> footway or carriageway.



That doesn't say that you can't skate in the road though, it just basically says don't act like a moron. I won't comment on how he was skating because I didn't see it, but if he just came off his board accidently then that's no different to a cyclist coming off their bike.


He shouldn't have run off, but we don't know how he was being spoken to and he might have just gotten scared.


PokerTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A skateboard has no brakes. It has only limited

> control. Yes it's pretty stupid for someone to

> skateboard down a road that motor vehicles and

> cyclists are using. That's all I'm trying to say.



A skateboard does have a brake of sorts, and a half decent skater can control their board more than well enough and stop very suddenly if need be.

These days I wouldn't dream of skating down a road, as it's been a looooooong time since I was a regular skater and I'd probably end up on my backside or worse. But when I was a teenager I'd happily skate in the roads (not busy roads like say Barry, and definitely not main roads) and don't believe I was a danger to any other road user because I could control my skateboard well.

Fair enough, but the police are really there for criminal matters, and I can't see anything up to the point when he ran away which could be construed as criminal.


It's an offence to not share your details after an accident, but to dispute liability or not to agree to pay unspecified damages at the roadside is not.


And as other posters have observed, the road user who goes into the back of the other is normally the one held liable.

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why was she calling the police anyway?

> Had a crime been committed?


I'd guess becasue someone who had (in her view) caused an accident which was going to cause financial loss was saying they were just going to leave it and walk away and not pay, and she wanted help to resolve it. In addition the OP says she was cut, bruised, and pretty shaken so calling the police seems not unreasonable to me.


Once he did run off then the crime is potentially Failing to stop / report an accident although I'm not sure if it could be brought to bear against a skateboarder.

As far as giving personal details goes, I don't think he falls within s.168 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, as he's not a rider of a bicycle; nor within s.170, unless you can prove (I think you cannot) that he was the driver of a mechanically propelled vehicle. I think he may have caused, or have been behaving in a way likely to cause, a breach of the peace.
He would be classed as a pedestrian so if there were blame to be assigned it would be under those terms. The only course of action for the scooter owner would be through civil avenues I think, that is providing he would be worth suing. She needs a name and address to do that of course. The police would have been able to help in that respect if he hadn't run away.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What "stricter" consequences could there be for shoplifting (or any other crime) than being put into jail, do you think? Though our prisons are of course full enough already, without more people being shoehorned  into them.
    • Returning to the original question, I had my jabs at Tessa Jowell yesterday. I was early and I was  seen on time, and it was a lovely pharmacist who did them, but the admin beforehand (not by her) was a bit iffy. I was given forms to fill in but not told what to do with them afterwards, so I  presumed I had to take them into the consulting room, as the rest was supposed to be filled in by a clinician, but no! After some time had elapsed and I had found a seat (there was no information on where to sit either, so people were sitting in two separate areas, neither of which had many seats) my name was called and  the forms were taken behind the counter. Be aware if you don't have an appointment - even in the relatively short time I was there, three people turned up without appointments having been sent there by a GP (I presume) or having  previously been  asked by the pharmacy to come  back at a different time, and they were all sent away again because the pharmacy didn't have enough flu vaccine until the following day. I have no idea if this was due to a misunderstanding on the people's side, their GP's or the pharmacy's, but none of them were very happy, and one lady said she "couldn't keep coming back" 😭  At least one of them didn't seem to understand what he was being told, possibly due to a language issue. I felt quite sorry for the pharmacist, who was giving jabs all day on top of her usual workload but still managing to stay cheerful! Though she wasn't the one dealing with the unhappy people! I have a sore arm from the Covid jab (I chose to have the jabs in different arms), but no other ill effects so far, touch wood. 
    • Line speed and the strength of your Wi-Fi signal are two separate things.  The first is determined by the type of connection (fibre/copper etc) to the outside world and the second is the connection between the device (printer/TV/laptop/tablet etc) and the router. If you are connecting a device to the router using cables (as Alec1 is) then this is will give the best possible connection but isn't practical for many without a degree of upheaval and even then not all devices (tablets for example) will allow a wired connection. So you relying on the quality of the Wi-Fi signal from the router to the device and this will depend on the quality of the router, the type of Wi-Fi connection (the frequency), line of sight etc - many different things.  This is why some people opt for a "mesh" type setup which is supposed to give a solid quality of Wi-Fi signal around the house with little or no blackspots.  It's expensive though and still requires the devices that send and receive the signal (like the plug-ins you have) to be wired to the router.
    • We have had a few cat flaps over the years but none have been electronic. They just have a small clip that you turn to lock or open.  Some come with a magnet and a matching magnet that the cat wears on its collar  This prevents other cats entering.  I've not used these as I don't like the idea of a cat wearing a collar. Cats do like to be out at night and you need to encourage yours to return after a late evening sortie. Calling,rustling treat wrappers worked for ours but he seems to have now got into the habit of coming back about 9pm. without this.        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...