Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A genuine question away from the other thread which has moved on to Queston Time.


With economists saying the overheated housing isn't going away any time soon, seriously, where the heck is everyone going to live?


It's absolutely bonkers. A very senior, successful colleague was in tears yesterday as she simply cannot find anywhere to upgrade her small family from their 2 bed flat to (without compromising hugely on safety and living standards).


It's so sad and scary. The future looks bleak for many.


.. Optimists, feel free to correct me.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/43885-where-are-we-all-going-to-live/
Share on other sites

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In the late 80s / early 90s a lot of people I knew

> bought with a friend or group of friends first

> time but you don't hear so much of that now.


Funny you should say that as that is the theme for a novel I'm trying to write. Two couples buy a house together at the end of the last boom thinking if they pool their resources together things will be fine. They can make a quick buck after a few years and move on but it all goes tits up.

We need a new 'mega city' that genuinely competes with London. Planning legislation stops the growth of attractive, affluent cities like Cambridge which could expand much further if allowed to. I'm london born and bred and can't imagine living anywhere else....but we need an alternative City that sucks in people and investment, we are too London-centric right now. We will have to give up green belt though which is the current stumbling block.

Woh there Steve- planning is a system put together by civil servants and politicians. Looks a bit closer. There's people have no interest in lowering prices.


I have no issue whatsoever of releasing green belt land around London Oxford Cambridge etc. put its such an unpopular thought it won't happen until those who a vested interest in keeping it are either out of power or more likely dead.


Another issue of course is in the northern cities there isn't the demand for homes- demand is London focussed. In my view much much more needs to be done to drive demand up north. That means infrastructure, incentivising businesses to go there and working on ensuring the skilled workforce which businesses want is there in plentiful supply.


It may have unnoticed but govt is proposing/supporting the idea of new garden cities around Home Counties. Maybe that would work?

PokerTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The good news is that seeing as 90% of us live on

> just 5% of the land there's always scope (with the

> right legislation) to do something.


Not inside the M25, where 100% of the people are living on about 90% of the land.


You want a house are a decent price? There are plenty in the UK. Hell, they can barely give them away in parts of Liverpool and Manchester.


But quids is right - this got done to death in the other thread, with no real answers to what should/could happen in London.

"Birmingham, Manchester"


Hard to say they really compete with London.


Both B'ham and Manchester are still small compared to London and confined to some extent by 100s of years of history and old infrastructure. Much easier to let a smaller city like a Cambridge or Oxford grow unchecked. They are centres of lost of investment potential and R&D built around the world class academic institutions and they have attractive city centres that would also be good for tourism and leisure, not sure B'ham can claim that (I lived there for 3 years).


I am no planning expert but there was a very interesting show about this on BBC2 a while back. The bloke from Dragons Den was hosting it and it made a lot of sense. You wouldn't need to build so many new houses in London if one or two other cities actually were attracting 100,000s of new residents.


It won't happen, but it's an interesting theory.

This theory suggests a credible second city would need to be 4m+ people.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-26472423


Think it loses an element of credibility by referencing US sitcom Frasier but there we go.


So I take the points and my conclusion to this is invest heavily in Manchester as a new NW hub with Cambridge allowed to become a major City too.

There is lots of housebuilding going on at the edges of Cambridge, in plain view to anyone who drives there. That's obviously a sign of a town that wants to grow. It seems mad to limit growth (which is also emanating from economic growth) for the sake of keeping Cambridge a small quaint enclave. Cambridge is the centre of some of the worlds leading research, including genetics and stem cell technology and could become the silicon city equivalent of the UK, if only we let it. At present, leading scientists and graduates are taking jobs with research bodies in Europe because the equivalent bodies in Cambridge can't grow enough within the space they have.


Ultimately, most people will live where they can find work. Proximity to family and friends is also often a consideration, but primarily people build their lives around a job that pays enough to provide certain things, like a home for their family. There are many prettier, and safer places to live than London and the SE but they have a dire shortage of jobs/ decent jobs. And that has been going on for decades. The free market has exercised it's right to not invest in those places, with the exception of essentials, like retail, public services etc.

"It seems mad to limit growth (which is also emanating from economic growth) for the sake of keeping Cambridge a small quaint enclave."


What are you going on about Pokertime? That doesn't make sense. Nor does much of the rest of your post ("could become silicon city if only we let it"). I'd imagine there's a few leading academics and research institutions that may feel you've forgotten they exist.


You've been to Cambridge and the surrounding area I take it? Plenty of growth, building or otherwise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...