Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I walked into the the newagents today to find the magazine rack covered wall-to-wall with Cheryl Cole.


Now this woman drives me mad.


How can anyone admire a woman who (allegedly) racially attacked a woman, (allegedly) slept with most of Newcastle United and is famous for what? Singing a little bit and wearing clothes. Where is there anything to admire in that?


There are more that I can mention:


Kate Moss

Peaches Geldof


With more young girls knowing the WAGS than any female MPs and their life ambition to be a model or a footballers wife, are there any people in the media that you think set a really bad role model?

All of them. A list - Z list. Anybody who would be happy to be described as a 'celebrity' i.e. no defining achievement. Ignore them - if we all did they would disappear and we could get on with more important things. (Not important as in weighty, serious, just important as in things that concern us, our friends and families as opposed to things concerning talentless attention-seeking inadequates).

To be fair to Kate Moss (and I am no fan) she is pretty much A List I would have thought. Totally with you on Peaches Geldof!


As for Cheryl Cole, I know what you're saying, but at least she is in a group. I can't stand the people that are "famous" for being in Big Brother or something similar.


I know some may disagree with this, but I can't stand Janet Street Porter!!! She obviously has some brains, but she gets her annoying self on every celebrity reality thing she can, and she goes on Question Time, and talks over everyone like she's an expert on everything, and she'll then come out with something rude, or risque before looking to the audience for a cheap laugh, which she seems to think means shes won the point. Grrr!!!! (6)

"To be fair to Kate Moss (and I am no fan) she is pretty much A List"


I know what you're saying but I'm totally with DaveR on this. Celebrity for its own sake is ultimately worthless.

She wears clothes, has her photo taken and encourages girls to snort coke in order to be borderline anorexic, well worth every penny of her millions, well done girl.


It does all devalue genuine achievement.


Katie Price is my nomination. I guess a minor tip of the hat for having survived and capitalised on on her start in a pretty ugly industry, but to constantly describe herself as an authoress and business woman? Pah.

Not to play devil's advocate, but I wouldn't say that Cheryl Cole was famous for "singing a little bit" - she's one fifth of Girls Aloud - a phenomenally successful pop group who've received critical acclaim as well as massive sales. I think there's something to admire there if pop's your thing.


Equally, with Keef on the Kate Moss thing. She might be a coke-addled serial rock f*cker and a terrible role model for women, but she's also an iconic figure in popular culture and has been at the top of the modelling game for quite some time.


But I wonder, is it really their responsibility to set themselves up as a role model? Aren't z-listers too just people living their lives and gaining fame and fortune however they can? I might find it dispiriting, but unless they expressly set out to do otherwise, I don't think it's anyone's responsibility to act as a role model for the nation.

Ooh and while I'm ranting .... ALEX EFFING JAMES!!!!!!


Yeah, he did learn an instrument and write tunes, and did well out of it, well done.

But does he have to appear on even more programmes than JSP? Writes a column for every publication in this country, be a celeb panelist as well as reality tv entrant, UN AMBASSADOR?!?!? I mean Question Time, seriously how is some floppy hair and the odd snort of derision actually going to grant me any extra insight into today's politics.


I don't suppose I can lay the blame of Auntie Beeb's dumbing down entirely at his door, let's just call him the poster child for that generation.


*c-c-c-c-c-c-cc--allllllllmmm d-d-d-d-d-oooooowwwwnn*

Not to play devil's advocate, but I wouldn't say that Cheryl Cole was famous for "singing a little bit" - she's one fifth of Girls Aloud - a phenomenally successful pop group who've received critical acclaim as well as massive sales. I think there's something to admire there if pop's your thing.


She won a competition because she can indeed sing a little bit.

There endeth the contribution. They don't write the songs, they're not behind their marketing, and the ones really laughing are of course the record execs behind them. They look pretty on a video and sometimes tour/tour the publicity circuit.

I'm sure it is really hard work, but then who out there doesn't work hard (apart from me today).


As for the role model, you can't have your cake and eat it. You can't be iconic and NOT a role model. On the one hand decrying press intrusion on your privacy to behave badly and the awful burden of being a role model; on the other bleating on about every celebrity cause de jour and wandering off to Darfuristan with the UN to highlight some plight or other.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "To be fair to Kate Moss (and I am no fan) she is

> pretty much A List"

>

> I know what you're saying but I'm totally with

> DaveR on this. Celebrity for its own sake is

> ultimately worthless.

> She wears clothes, has her photo taken and

> encourages girls to snort coke in order to be

> borderline anorexic, well worth every penny of her

> millions, well done girl.

>

Actually, I would say well done girl. Let's face it, she was never going to win a Nobel prize, she's not done badly for a thicko.


While I don't buy Hello and Heat and the rest of them, and am bored witless by most reality tv (I do like Strictly though) I can see that they're a form of entertainment and people - maybe not us but people - like them.


The people starring in them are making the kind of money that they wouldn't be able to make working down Tescos. Perhaps in an ideal world, salaries would be commensurate with how much the earner was adding to the overall sum of human experience... Is it not just intellectual snobbery to condemn people for making the best living they're capable of?

In Cheryl Cole's defence, I actually met her for the first time at Ashley Cole's 21st birthday party a few years ago (my friend is good mates with him). She's a nice enough girl really. A lot more human than most of the 'WAGS' (god, I hate that term) out there. She came across as being fairly reserved and unassuming. I certainly wouldn't put her in the same category as the likes of Roonie's other half, whatever her name is! As a couple, they were not there to impress or get stupidly intoxicated. In fact, it was one of the more civilised parties I've been to in my life. The press just love to make a story out of nothing...


Just to add to the name-dropping, I was out at a club in Vegas last weekend and had the displeasure of both Brittany and J-Lo in the same venue. The entourages were hilarious! It was obvious that a lot of Brittany's 'girl-friends' were hired in and she also had her own photographer (anyone else even attempting to take photos was frog-marched to the door!). We promptly left soon after they arrived, at it was an atmosphere killer for us.


Celebrity for celebrity sake. I can't stand it. There are very few other countries that are as obsessed with it as the UK. I think it's generally for people that have nothing interesting in their own lives to be getting on with, so would rather follow that of others...

Nicole Ritchie, Callum Best, Paris Hilton, Kimberly Stewart, whatever Ray Winstone's daughter is called, whatever the tongue-out-sticking, singing daughter of that crazy-looking actor is called ... anyone who's famous for being someone famous's child, being thin and falling out of taxis. The Osbourne children are excepted, as they seem quite fun and sassy.


But I agree with Mockers that it's all to do with the viewing public buying the mags...


Slightly unbelievably, I think Noel Gallagher made a good point about X-Factor and the inevitable fate of most of their winners quite recently. What do you do when you used to be a check-out person, and then you were a pop star and now you aren't a pop star any more?

Jade Goody. It irritates me that someone so stupid could be in so many magazines.


I don't think she's anywhere near as thick as people think. She's no accademic, but she has done what many other contestants of BB have failed to do and made quite a success of herself.

I know what you mean, Keef. She's a bit like Katie Price - she's obviously determined, astute and sharp. So not really stupid. But she IS stupid in lots of quite important ways - like the ability to listen, the ability to be interested in the world around her, any kind of curiosity. I found her and her monstrous mother's presence on our TV screens quite scary.

Richard Littlejohn

Piers Morgan

Melanie Philips


- all for the obvious reasons


Geri Halliwell - I think it's the desparation to be loved that grates.

Bono - Take off those fecking sunglasses (oh and The Edge - for being called The Edge) and get out of my tv.

Gillian McKeith - I'm on a FaceBook group that pledges to force-feed the witch a mars-bar if I ever spot her in the street.

The Osbourne children are excepted, as they seem quite fun and sassy.


I quite like Jack & Kelly. I mean they were bought up with money, fair enough, but then suddenly found themselves living in a soap opera, and were obviously going to act up a bit. However, I think they've both grown up and hold themselves quite well.


Interestingly, they have an older sister Aimee, who was old enough to make the decision to have nothing to do with The Osbourne's TV show, and any footage with her in could not be used. Good for her, but Kelly & Jack were too young to have made that decision and moved out.


Sharon Osbourne... I go from respecting and quite liking her, to thinking she is the most dispicible thing on telly (next to JSP of course). Great business woman (got that from her dad), but was happier when Ozzy was just a rock God, and she was his manager!

I simply don't care about any of them - however what I find sad is that some young girls would rather be a WAG or to gain 'celebrity' status in some other way than actually go out and get a job/career. If all you ever aspire to is to wear killer heels (and other stuff) on the front cover of a magazine - what do you do when you realise that isn't ever going to happen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So much nonsense in a single post! 1) this vaguely xenophobic stuff is based on a belief that London is full of houses owned by foreigners that are kept empty and out of the hands of native buyers and renters. This is unmitigated bullshit. "England has the lowest rate of empty homes in the OECD, and Greater London has about one-tenth the level of Paris, just 0.7% of properties being empty compared to 6.5%...the effect on the general housing crisis is minuscule. London, Oxford, Cambridge, Brighton and other cities have eye-wateringly expensive housing because of high demand and low supply. That’s the obvious and boring answer." https://www.edwest.co.uk/p/the-myth-of-londons-empty-homes 2) where do you get this idea that infill sites have to be small? Southwark and the GLA planning documents explicitly recognise that industrial sites can be infill sites. 3) It is simply factually untrue and misleading that taller buildings are out of character for the area of the development. The neighbouring school has taller blocks, Hambledon Court on the other side of the tracks is a taller building, the Dog Kennel Hill estate on the other side of the station consists of taller buildings. 4) if that is the lesson you have taken away, then is your opposition to this new housing in East Dulwich part of a Lib Dem policy to "deny, baby, deny"? Let's be real for a second: there is no way out of the housing crisis that doesn't involve building lots of new housing. If we can't build on top of a disused builder's yard above a railway station, where are we going to build in this neighbourhood? 5) This is also nonsense. The student accommodation was initially closed because of systemic fire risks that made the buildings unsafe. KCL is now halfway through totally renovating the blocks and expanding capacity. KCL gets twice as many applications for student accommodation as it can fulfil. KCL just opened another 452 student rooms in Battersea - so clearly they don't have a concern about a cataclysmic decline in student numbers. https://www.rlb.com/europe/projects/kcl-champion-hill/ https://roarnews.co.uk/2024/kcl-accommodation-still-empty-four-years-after-evacuation/ https://www.constructionenquirer.com/2025/03/03/watkin-jones-wins-30m-student-digs-campus-upgrade/   It is really disappointing that someone involving themselves in planning matters is relying on (and spreading) prejudices, misconceptions and misinformation like this.
    • Hello, I am pleased to let you know that registration for the Spring term is now open. Classes will begin from the week commencing 12th January 2026.  Spring Term Classes We offer a wide range of online and in-person classes to build confidence, creativity and future-ready skills. Click on the links below for more details: Onsite Coding and STEM classes at libraries in Southwark Online Coding Classes Online Maths Classes Online Creative and non-fiction writing classes Duke of Edinburgh’s Award 👉Click  here to register: https://www.ignitehubs.org.uk/register New Online Coding Classes Micro:bit – Physical Computing An introduction to physical computing and coding using the BBC Micro:bit through interactive projects. Please note: after the half-term break, students will need to have access to a Micro:bit. They cost around £18, and we will provide details on where to buy one if needed. Ignite Hubs will provide free kits to families in need of financial support. To find out more about Micro:bit, please click here. 🕛 Mondays | 5pm to 6pm Age 7 to 18 Click here for more details Computational Thinking Learn the core principles of computer science. Explore how computers work and develop computational thinking skills. 🕛 Wednesdays | 6pm to 7pm Age 7 to 18 Click here for more details Duke of Edinburgh’s Award (DofE) Ignite Hubs is an Approved Activity Provider for the skills section of the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award (DofE). Students can select any of our classes as their chosen skill. Click here for more details: https://www.ignitehubs.org.uk/duke-of-edinburgh Places are limited, so please book as soon as possible.  We look forward to welcoming your child to learn with us for an exciting Spring term. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Many thanks,   Lin Ignite Hubs Coding Classes Spring 26.pdf STEM Hub Spring 26.pdf
    • I'm sure there's a coherent point in there somewhere, but I can't fathom what it might be TBH
    • Sadly this is a problem every year and on every road.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...