Jump to content

Trying to buy a Lamborghini for under ?250K in East Dulwich is near impossible


Recommended Posts

It's a scandal. All those Barclays bankers (choose your own rhyming slang) who want to spend last year's bonus on a nice car and not a Lamborghini showroom in sight in ED. Please do your best to persuade them not to leave the country to buy one for under ?250k - we need their skills so much.

No, it won't affect my finances.


And that's just the kind of special pleading used by the finance industry to justify ginormous bonuses. This led in due course to the crash of 2008 and the mess that the world is in today.


A bit more investment in industry than in the glorified gambling trade that is the finance industry would make a helluva difference

Don't bother Loz, people just don't get it London was knocked off the perch as the primary global financial centre earlier this year to New York, it's draining away. People seem to think we can lose all of this without any harm to the economy, tax revenues, public services, they have no grasp of the fundamentals of economics, at all. Depressing. Most of Gordon Brown's spending flourish post 2000 was on the back of City Taxation if we want to get rid of it fine they say ....but that means similar 'trims' to the Public Sector on top of the cuts already witnessed. Good luck with that....


And, no, for the millionth time I don't work in the City or FS or in a any related support area - Management consultancy, accountancy, Legal, high end restaurants, etc etc....

Rather than further massive benefit cuts, how about raising taxes, especially the top rate of tax, plus a property tax as we had until the 60s?


Q: Who was the PM who presided over a 60% top rate of tax for most of the 1980s.


A. Not Harold Wilson, not Jim Callaghan - but that famous socialist Margaret Thatcher.


If it was good enough for Thatcher (as was a nationalised British Rail), then true Tories should embrace this with open arms.


And good riddance to the RBS bankers. They wrecked the economy and it was the Government who had to bail them out. People who claim benefits are "scroungers" but banks who demand massive hand outs from the Government of course aren't. Or are they?


And I do know something about economics. However, unlike so many economists these days, I'm not a monetarist but more of a Keynesian, a philosophy which is coming back into fashion at long last.

Yup, higher top rate of tax is going really well for France. That's where you can look to for how well those policies work (and what ed Balls suggested)........even Ed Milliband keeps stum about France and his support for Hollande now.

France is not the only country with higher taxation. Scandinavian countries have had high taxation, and much better social services, for decades, without the massive inequalities of wealth than we have. But of course if we had followed the Norwegian example of investing our North Sea oil revenue in retooling industry rather than squandering it on enormous tax cuts, then we might be in a better position now.


It's not too late for us to become more like a Scandinavian country. It would however help if we stopped spending so much money on defence and stopped kidding ourselves that the British Empire still exists. This regrettably seems unlike whoever is in government after 2015.

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> France is not the only country with higher

> taxation. Scandinavian countries have had high

> taxation, and much better social services, for

> decades, without the massive inequalities of

> wealth than we have. But of course if we had

> followed the Norwegian example of investing our

> North Sea oil revenue in retooling industry rather

> than squandering it on enormous tax cuts, then we

> might be in a better position now.

>

> It's not too late for us to become more like a

> Scandinavian country. It would however help if we

> stopped spending so much money on defence and

> stopped kidding ourselves that the British Empire

> still exists. This regrettably seems unlike

> whoever is in government after 2015.


And last time I checked, Oslo and Stockholm weren't financial centres either. Yet somehow they cope....



It gambles with its money, rips off its shareholders by paying excessive bonuses and provides lousy service to its customers. And if we are really unlucky, the government has to bale them out when they go bust.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy - Copenhagen is no more expensive than London for eating out.


Denmark has never been that bad, price-wise. Sweden and Norway, on the other hand, are eye-wateringly expensive.


All the Swedes head to Copenhagen for 'cheap' weekend benders. Thus the Danish joke, "What do you call a drunk person lying on the Str?get?"


"Swedish"

Was kind of a throwaway comment... cost of living is high in all those countries. But GDPPC also much higher. I'm not at all against higher tax if it results in a more equitable society, higher living standards, better public services, etc. But would question whether it's possible to emulate that style of economy within the EU.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> And, no, for the millionth time I don't work in

> the City or FS or in a any related support area -

> Management consultancy, accountancy, Legal, high

> end restaurants, etc etc....


Out of interest and because you seem to have a measured view on all this, what is your back ground ?

Economics is obviously a strong point. Though I'm not asking tooth and claw detail here, just a sketch


Just interested in how people form their views and opinions

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...