Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bon3yard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Penelope Pitstop. As for the female denizens of

> Bedrock...I'd go with Wilma, but I'd be thinking

> of Betty!



See - there you go! Another tasty female cartoon character. We get Dick Dastardly!! You can tell that it was definitely fellas that used to do all the animation...

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Aladdin could surely feature in Lisa Simpson's

> "Unthreatening Boys" calendar? You'd have more fun

> rubbing the Genie's lamp.


Aladdin had no nipples. Apparently Disney has a problem with nipples. You can't hanker after someone with no nipples.

Although not a cartoon character I remember finding the Buddhist Monk Tripitaka from Monkey emminantly fanciable when I was a nipper, he/she was beautiful. I subsequently found out that the charcter was in fact a lady playing a guy in that great Thesp tradition...but its quite amazing how ambiguous sexuality can stir up a whole host of congflicting emotions, dontchathink?

CamberwellOz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't say I fancied them as such but they were

> my favourite couple on television when I was a

> kid.

>

> http://www.blazesoftball.com/images/statler_waldor

> f_02_01.jpg


The fact that you posted your 'liking' for them on a thread titled 'Cartoon Characters you fancied' says much about your feelings for Statler and Waldorf CamberwellOz. These were not cartoons, but puppets. I believe that Freud indicated, in a lesser known monograph that a woman who was 'interested' in a puppet was highly significant in some way or another.

He concluded (or it may have been a footnote by Les Dawson, I can't be sure) that it would end up in a bed full of sawdust.

And you fancy the two of them!!! 'Struth CO, seek help, from Gerry Anderson, if necessary.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well I didn't personally fancy her, perish the

> thought, but that very sexy Rabbit (?Jessica

> Rabbit?) in Who Killed Roger Rabbit.

>

> Drunk? Not me :))


Of COURSE you didn't personally fancy Jessica Rabbit.

Who by the way was not a rabbit, but a pneumatic, pulchridutinous, hot red-headed woman. She just happened to be married to a git of a rabbit. And then you just throw in the drunk thing.

On the one hand, there's Jessica Rabbit. On the other hand there's a drunk Sue.

I'm saying "CLAP HANDS BROTHER AND SISTERS"

just to see what happens.

Hic.

It seems to me, that mentioning the Smurfs on a Cartoon Characters you fancied thread equates with that whole Anne Widdecombe peculiar lust, which took place on another. Thread that is.

And of course, on another is where that sort of lust or fancying belongs.

'Cordding to my Mama.

Annasfield, think you must be too young to remember Jason from Battle of the Planets? He could transmute me any day.


And is it really really wrong to fancy a cartoon without personality, who is in fact just a character in a video game? Step forward Ryu from Street Fighter (to be fair he did have a back story)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Other than acting as 'interested parties' Southwark Councillors have no responsibility for water issues. And no real leverage either. Considering the complete disdain with which Thames Water treats its own Regulator, and the government, (let alone its customers) I doubt very much whether an entire battalion of councillors would have much impact. What powers could they exercise?
    • That may not be so - many on this site are experts in many areas - you yourself claim huge traffic management (or similar) expertise for instance. And I think you will find that Southwark employees are unlikely to support criticism or challenges to Southwark policy - why, you don't and you apparently neither live in, or vote in, the borough. Do you, however, work for it, as you are such a cheerleader? If not, then you are the most passionate disinterested person on this site, as regards so many aspects, not just traffic.
    • Rather than have a go at Southwark,  contact them, they will employ at least one arborist who will know far more than most people on this site. Here's one: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shaun-murphy-morris-03b7b665/?originalSubdomain=uk
    • I would look in the surrounding area as once they realise it has nothing they could sell or of obvious monatary value in it they'll dump the bag and contents.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...