Jump to content

Recommended Posts

East dulwich grove pelican crossing by Dulwich communtiy hospital had car upto my feet using this pelican crossing.

my hubby disabled and has to use this everyday and nearly very day cars just speed over it even when see you trying to cross.

not well lite...... think should be a traffic light rather than pelican as another pelican further up and that ones ok seem to stop at that one.

near glenarry road.


melbourne grove adjoining east dulwich grove a nightmare as cars coming at you 4/5 ways and often speeding,lot children use that one.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> nope - impatient drivers cause impatient

> driving... the inconvenience of waiting mere

> seconds for a green man to flash compared to the

> horror of crossing uncontrolled traffic? hmmmm

>

> accidents is a funny word as well - have a look at

> most accident reports - were they accidents or

> were assumptions made which turned out not to be

> true?


Agree with you here, Sean, and you raise an intersting point re: 'accidents'. Police now refer to them as 'collisions' rather than accidents as generally they will find that somebody was at fault whether due to careless /drunk /impatient /arrogant driving and therefore cannot really be considered an accident.

Tinkering with pavement furniture, kerbs, bollards, humps and bumps, pelicans etc is not going to address the root cause of this anti-social behaviour.


Put speed traps up all over the place, snap everyone doing 25mph in the 20 zone, or 35 in the 30 zone, instant ₤150 fine in the post.


You'd only need to run it one day a month to start to affect behaviour. Also, our council tax would be slashed by all the extra money coming in.

Totally agree with Izodia about the zebra crossings - for example whenever I cross the one between Dulwich Picture Gallery and Dulwich park, cars actually accelerate. Someone told me it's technically illegal to drive over zebra crossings as you have to always approach them at a speed at which you could stop, which made me laugh, although I'm not entirely sure whether it's true.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for clarifying, James. So why would anybody want to take this on as a franchise if it is staying in this building? If it is now to be a sub office, does that mean that much of  the space could be used as a different kind of business altogether, with just part of it being used as a sub Post Office? Because if it is all to remain solely for Post Office business, (albeit as a sub Post Office it won't be providing all the services which it currently does) I can't see who would want to take it over? If it isn't profitable as a Crown office, how could it be  profitable running just as a sub office, even if staff are being paid less and it's opening for longer hours? Because presumably all the other overheads such as rent will remain the same?
    • Girobank was genuinely innovative, regarding the addressed customer base (significantly the previously unbanked) - but this would have been an ideally outsourced operation to an existing bank which already had the operational systems (and the regulatory experts) to manage a bank for someone else at marginal cost. The Post Office - when you consider the issues over the Horizon software - never originally designed by ICL/ Fujitsu for the application it ran - is a very good reason why the Post Office being involved in banking was long-term a bad idea.  To get back to the topic of this thread, the Horizon debacle is still not over (the software system is still in place) - most of the wrongly penalised sub-postmasters are still out of pocket - I'm not sure I would be leaping to take on the franchise being offered in Lordship Lane.
    • Otherwise in Bellenden Road are brilliant! They’ve made me stage dresses, restructured vintage finds and are working on remodelling my late brothers huntsman tweed suit for my modern husband! Not cheap and rents have meant they are moving premises at mo.
    • Penguin, I broadly agree, except that the Girobank was a genuinely innovative and successful operation. It’s rather ironic that after all these years we are now back to banking at the Post Office due to all the bank branch closures.  I agree that the roots of the problem go back further than 2012 (?), when the PO and RM were separated so RM could be sold. I’m willing to blame Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher or even Keith Joseph. But none of them will be standing for the local council, hoping to make capital out of the possible closure of Lordship Lane PO, as if they are in no way responsible. The Lib Dems can’t be let off the hook that easily.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...