Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hi we recently had to do this, as my neighbour has been building a loft and side return...we only found out about having the party wall aaward at the last minute, as they didn't get anything in place, and so glad we did! We used Mark Douglas, and he has been really helpful and helped us in some compensation payment as a result of the neighbours rubbish builders which affected our roof!! He is thorough and recommended and helped us enormously . his email and mobile are- [email protected] 07971 710 041

I used James Lewis for my party wall advice on a build in Herne Hill

http://www.jlewissurveyors.co.uk/

At the end of a long and complicated building project there's not that many of the people I used for the various elements that I would use again or recommend. James is one of them.

  • 2 months later...

Can anybody on here help?


I am the other side of the party wall from a new loft extension.


I stupidly agreed to use a surveyor who was acting for both parties, mainly because it was very short notice and I was very busy. He did a survey of my house prior to the work commencing but hasn't been back since.The survey didn't fill me with much confidence as it contained a number of basic errors just in the description of my house.


Over the course of the building work, which was from January to May, a few minor cosmetic cracks appeared in plaster, and also there was a problem due to water coming in and staining my wall, both of which the builders sorted.


Also during this time my back door started sticking badly, which it never had done before (in over twenty years) but because there had been heavy rain I assumed at the time that it was due to damp.


However to my horror I recently saw diagonal cracks across the corner of my living room ceiling (just the other side of the back door). These problems are along the same line through the house as the cracking was in the plaster.


The surveyor said he would contact me to arrange to come and look at this, but despite several chase-ups hasn't.


The builder says that there is no way that anything wrong downstairs can be due to vibration from the building work, and has more or less accused me of trying to use him to get repairs done in my house for free :(


I have googled this and found a website "oldhouseweb" which says


".... house settling can occur, particularly on clay soils, when there is a nearby source of vibration"


Since at times my whole house was shaking during the building of the extension next door. I think it's pushing credibility to think that the timing of these cracks and door sticking can be coincidence, since there has been no other movement of my house for over thirteen years.


I really need to get this sorted quickly.


Can anybody on here tell me whether strong vibration from the building of a loft extension upstairs could potentially cause these problems downstairs, or whether as the builder says that is impossible?


Thanks.

Sue

Another consideration has to be the "loading spread" element of a loft conversion. This can occur after the installation of RSJ's (or equivalent) into the party wall and is probably the major factor why these agreements/awards were introduced in 1996 I think it was. This can be an indirect occurence. A good analogy to use is a skydiver landing slightly awkward and the energy forces cause, let's say, a fracture of the shoulder rather than of the foot. In much the same way, the loading forces can produce problems away from the immediate area, as oppossed to a direct problem such as in the immediate area. The builder is probably correct about the vibration element as the forces are so minor that only direct occurence would be seen ie; right next to/near where the vibration was being caused.

You absolutely must get the surveyor back or get it checked out independantly. Remember, the neighbour has to cover the fees involved.


That should have read; This can be REFERRED to as an indirect occurence.

A lot of people think that the act is only to cover them if the builder causes a hole right the way through the party wall when doing the "knocking about", but the load bearing aspect is by far the main raison d'etre of the act. I speak from past experience and I am sure there must be better qualified surveyors or (civil) engineers out there who could better elucidate the same.
  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

After a lot of to-ing and fro-ing, the surveyor now says "I can categorically confirm that the cracking could not have been caused by any structural work in connection with the loft conversion - because in those areas (I presume he means the areas of the cracking) there are no steel beams and no cutting into the party wall."


Should I accept that, because I thought the whole point about the "loading spread" was that cracks could appear in other areas away from any actual steel beams or cutting?

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 7 months later...

Picking this thread up, if anyone's still on it!


Our neighbours had some work done which has caused movement on our patio so a whole row of patio is now uneven and wobbly because a crack has opened up beneath.


The joint surveyor who drew up the party wall agreement before their work was carried out has inspected it and judged it be their responsibility to rectify the damage, and has been writing to them and leaving messages but getting no response.


What do you do when neighbours simply ignore the surveyor and don't repair damage? Small claims court feels extreme but I'm not sure what other options we have.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
    • BBC and the IFS https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e12j4gz0o From BBC Verify:   Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said Reeves "may be overegging the £22bn black hole". What about the rest of the £22bn? The government published a breakdown, external of how it had got from the Treasury's £9.5bn shortfall in February to the £22bn "black hole". It said that there was another £7bn between February and the actual Budget in March, as departments found out about new spending pressures and the government spent more on the NHS and the Household Support Fund There was a final £5.6bn between then and late July, which includes almost a month when Labour was in power. That was largely caused by increases in public sector pay. It was the Labour government that accepted the recommendations of the Pay Review Bodies (PRBs), but they said that the previous government should have budgeted for more than a 2% increase in public sector pay. Prof Stephen Millard from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank told BBC Verify: "The 'political' question is whether you would count this as part of the fiscal black hole or not. If you do, then you get to the £22bn figure; if not, then you’re left with around £12.5bn to £13.5bn." It isn't this at all. When you run on an agenda of change and cleaning up politics and you put all of the eggs of despair in a basket at the door of the previous government you better hope you have a long honeymoon period to give you time to deliver the change you have promised. Look at the NHS, before the election it was all...it's broken because of 14 years of Tory incompetence and the implication was that Labour could fix is quickly. Then Wes Streeting (who is one of the smarter political cabinet members and is clearly able to play the long game) started talking about the need to change the NHS before the election - he talked about privatising parts of it (much to the annoyance of the left). He was being pragmatic because the only magic wand that is going to fix the NHS is massive reform - it's broken and has been for decades and throwing money at it has just papered over the cracks. Now Labour talk about the NHS needing 10 years of healing for there to be real difference and people are saying....what..... Words in opposition are easy; actions in government are a lot harder and I fear that given the structural issues caused by Covid, the energy crisis, the war in Ukraine (and now maybe a massive US/China trade war if Trump isn't bluffing) that we are heading to constant one-term governments. I don't think there was a government (and correct me if I am wrong) that survived Covid and in a lot of countries since Covid they have had regular government change (I think what is playing out in the US with them voting Trump in is reflective of the challenges all countries face). Labour massively over-egged the 14 years of hurt (who could blame them) but it is going to make things a lot tougher for them as they have set the expectation that changing government cures all the ills and as we have seen in the first 90 days of their tenure that is very much not the case. Completely agree but the big risk if Farage. If Labour don't deliver what they promised or hit "working people" then the populists win - it's happening everywhere. Dangerous, dangerous times ahead and Labour have to get it right - for all our sakes - no matter what party we support. P.S. Lammy is also one of the better Labour front-bench folks - he just is suffering from Labour's inability to think far enough ahead to realise that some posts might come back to haunt you...but in his defence did anyone really think Americans would be daft enough to vote him in again....;-)
    • My cat has been missing since Sunday evening 17th November he is British short hair male cat colour black with grey stripes. medium to large in size. He is easily identified by a large tooth missing on the top left of his mouth.  He lives in Upland Road just near the roundabout at Underhill Road. His name is Jack but he  only answers to Puss Puss please call me on 0208 299 2275 if you see him.   thank you Linda  
    • I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!  But why don't you  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey. Tell  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is 🤣 I'm sure they will be delighted 🤣  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...