Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all


So I know the advice re SIDS and baby's position but I wanted to get some opinion. My son (12 weeks) currently sleeps on his side and finds it really hard to sleep on his back. After delivery he was placed on his side by the midwives as he was vomiting lots of swallowed fluids. He is very strong and I am worried he already has the capacity to roll into his tummy although he's not done it yet. My question is whether anyone has experience of this and whether anyone has used cot positionerd to support baby in the side position?


Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/42631-sleeping-baby-on-side/
Share on other sites

Hi Jenny

My daughter (now 4 months) definitely found it easier to settle when placed on her side. She was a terrible sleeper so I had some help from two excellent maternity nurses/ night nannies who had both cared for numerous babies in their long careers and they both supported settling a baby on his/her side as many prefer it. The SIDS risk is slightly higher when they are on their sides as I understand it, but not as high as when they are on their front. I do however understand your fears about your son rolling onto his front - although again the SIDS risk is very small, but I, like you, would want to minimise it as much as possible! Do you have a video baby monitor? Could you keep an eye on the situation and/or see what he does for naps first?

My daughter was a tummy sleeper from day 1. She could also lift and turn her head pretty much from birth, so the midwives just shrugged. I mean, my daughter would absolutely HOWL if put on her back. Since her head control was so strong, the midwives suggested that this probably mitigated some of the risk of tummy sleeping, although I don't think there is any actual data on head control/tummy sleeping.


Also, I do remember reading about some baby positioners being recalled because they were associated with an increased risk of suffocation or SIDS (it was not clear which, due to the small number of fatalities, I think). I think these may have been specifically positioners for co-sleeping, so other risk factors would apply. I will try to find the article.


When co-sleeping, my daughter naturally positioned herself on her tummy in the middle of my chest, which seemed natural for both of us. When she was a little older (~3 months), I bought an Amby baby hammock and finally got her to sleep on her back. Maybe a baby hammock would be better than a plain positioner?

Thanks very much, great to hear your experiences. He has an underlying breathing issue and has also picked up a load of colds so if he ends up on his back he just splutters and gasps. He actually sleeps in a bednest next to me and I'm a vey light sleeper, he also wakes frequently in the night due to his breathing issues so to be honest we're awake more than we're asleep! He also sleeps on me in the bed quite a bit. I'd say no more than an hour passes without us having some sort of contact. He sleeps in his Moses during the day or on me/in the sling. He has a teddy which props him up a bit and a rolled up towel behind him for some warmth and comfort. I guess I'm half thinking about putting him into his room at some point when I won't be right there to check on him which makes me anxious.

I don't think its possible for babies to sleep on their sides on a hammock? Might work as a comfy alternative to a flat bed, for the reluctant baby, but if he is just going to splutter I don't know if it will work.


I have one I stopped using last summer if you would like to borrow it for a trial? I have the positioner as well.(I used it from birth to about 16 weeks, then the weather got crazy hot I figured it might be more comfortable in a cot.)

Your son sounds like my now 5 1/2 month old was Jenny as he only liked sleeping on his side too. I also had a bednest and he could only sleep; on his side in that/ on his side in the bed next to me or on his tummy on me and i really worried too about when the time came to move him to a cot as I wouldn't be able to see him but actually its been ok (only been 2 weeks though i guess). He kind of rolls a bit on his side in the cot but not fully and only flips to his tummy in the morning when practising his rolling when he's awake. I actually notice that if i have him in the bednest if we're having an unsettled night he goes back to full side sleeping and I think it is slightly because of the angle of it and also he smells me and wants to get closer. I do have the angelcare monitor pad under the cot mattress though which provides me with a bit reassurance so that might be an idea if you are worried.
Hi Jenny, I've just started putting our 3 week old down on his side as he's really colicky and grunty and seems much more comfortable like this. I looked into the sleep positioners but found a few articles saying they were dangerous, apparently mothercare/tesco etc stopped selling them a few years ago due to suffocation risks, don't know how accurate it all is. I use 2 rolled up blankets to support him- one on front, one on back and starting from waist downwards, seems to work- he's still v noisy though!

Audrey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think its possible for babies to sleep on

> their sides on a hammock? Might work as a comfy

> alternative to a flat bed, for the reluctant baby,

> but if he is just going to splutter I don't know

> if it will work.

>



I don't know what type you had/have so couldn't comment. The Amby hammock is made for babies to sleep on their backs with the upper body slightly elevated, which makes it good for colds/reflux. Although of course every baby is different. xx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...