Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This happened to me last year (at tge end of last summer) & I reported it. A young black male dressed in black with a black high topped baseball cap & sitting on a black bicycle (with no markings on it) knocked on the door very loudly & persistently. I eventually answered the door to find him banging his bike against my side gate, whilst trying his best to get in. He said he was looking for his friend Anthony & said it must be the wrong house. He then sped off.

It was pretty obvious what his game plan was!

Yes those young black male hoodlum hoodies do tend to get on their bikes and search for an easy opportunity, whether it be an empty house or a vulnerable person (but usually do it in gangs, as they are basically cowards) - don't give them any chances! I had my mobile phone snatched by one of them on a bike a couple of years ago in broad daylight ago and now i don't speak on my phone in public if i can help it.

ClareC Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wottajoke Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On the other hand the guy could have knocked at

> > the wrong house.

>

>

> Pigs could fly.....


Why? The guy was walking away from house as they opened the door . Maybe it was just the wrong door .

Chips56 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ClareC Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wottajoke Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > On the other hand the guy could have knocked

> at

> > > the wrong house.

> >

> >

> > Pigs could fly.....

>

> Why? The guy was walking away from house as they

> opened the door . Maybe it was just the wrong door

> .


Course it's not the wrong door. He was a "young black male".

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> northlondoner Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Course it's not the wrong door. He was a "young

> black male".

>

> You can never quite tell tone of voice from the

> written word, can you? Sarcasm or racism? Hmmmm.


xxxxxx


Sarcasm in this case, surely? That was how I read it, anyway.

Prunella_Gatsby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes those young black male hoodlum hoodies do tend

> to get on their bikes and search for an easy

> opportunity, whether it be an empty house or a

> vulnerable person (but usually do it in gangs, as

> they are basically cowards) - don't give them any

> chances! I had my mobile phone snatched by one of

> them on a bike a couple of years ago in broad

> daylight ago and now i don't speak on my phone in

> public if i can help it.



This is one of the most ridiculous things i have read in a while. 'One of them'. Pffft.

Lumping all black, teenage, hoody wearers together is definitely a backwards step towards encouraging unity in the community. Pure xenophobia.


EDIT: .... And stereotyping

It has to be said, that reading some of these comments and some of the threads on this forum don't show East Dulwich in a very good light. Whether it's people venting outrage at scruffy doorsteps and a whole bunch of other inane stuff, to displays of outright rudeness and the outrageous comment by PrunellaG on this thread. I'm dismayed that there seems to be no logical moderation by the admin.

"it doesn't say anything positive about this forum, or the Administrator of it, if that post remains"


Really? rock and a hard place innit. Comment gets removed and admin is accused of censorship.

The forum is made up of all it's contributors, they do not necessarily reflect the views etc.


In this case an iffy comment has earned rebuke by the community, and I would rather the forum was by and large self-policed than heavy handed moderation.


A quick look at posting history of prunella revelas her to be (at least ostensibly) a self-confessed little old lady who has posted rather obsessively about crime since experinecing her own 'a couple of years ago'.


I'd probably try to enlighten rather than suppress, no?

PokerTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I agree mickey.....it doesn't say anything

> positive about this forum, or the Administrator of

> it, if that post remains. I've hit the report

> button. We'll see if that prompts any action.


Snap, I too have hit the report button.

I also find it offensive, narrow minded and racist.

I can't help thinking poor bloke did make a genuine mistake, after all he WAS cycling away when the poster got to the front door..not trying to break in.

Often at night its hard to see door numbers from the street and mistakes can be made.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...