Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just to be clear the EE signal box isn't a signal booster, it's a femtocell. It's effectively a personal base station you plug into your router which then connects via the internet to their network, range (they say) about 15m. When I spoke to the customer service they clearly had no idea what it was and were saying it needs at least one bar to amplify, which is irrelevant. They also told me their service checker said I had a "good" signal, also wrong.


Just hang on and argue.

ruffers> Just to be clear the EE signal box isn't a signal booster, it's a femtocell.


Interesting. I hadn't been aware of such things. It looks close to having an additional VoIP service provided by your telco. Do they all provide them now? I see that Three do ( http://www.tubblog.co.uk/blog/2013/05/13/using-a-three-home-signal-femtocell-to-improve-a-mobile-phone-signal-2/ or http://support.three.co.uk/SRVS/CGI-BIN/WEBISAPI.DLL/,/?New,Kb=Mobile,Ts=Mobile,T=CaseDoc,Case=obj%285440%29).


I also see that EE say:


"When you use the Signal Box it will use some of your of your home broadband allowance. To give you a guide: a 20 minute call will use around 9MB." http://help.ee.co.uk/system/selfservice.controller?CONFIGURATION=1016&PARTITION_ID=1&secureFlag=false&segment=consumer&TIMEZONE_OFFSET=&CMD=VIEW_ARTICLE&ARTICLE_ID=629170&CUSTOM_BRAND=Orange&SOURCE_RELATED_ARTICLE=true


and also:


"You can also use the 3G signal to access the internet, but we'd recommend you use WiFi because it saves on your monthly data allowance and is generally faster."


So presumably you pay them for such EE network use, even voice calls, at their data rate rather than by time?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Leftfield maxxi strikes again. Week 13 points...   Week 13 table...
    • I think it was her solicitor that identified past issues, not the survey, but yes the whole thing was very odd. As was the fact she posted it all on here! And kept referring to it as a "project." Maybe she never actually intended to live in it. Who knows.
    • Oh my.....FIFA.....still managing to embarrass themselves. Absolutely. Well said.
    • it did seem like a rediculous almost troll like post... I did'nt love the property/it was'nt priced like a probate property which is what I'd asked for/I can afford 5k (or whatever...) extra insurance premium its not about the extra cost/also considering Clapham etc etc.. I reiterate that anyone daft enough to put in an offer on a property which I gather is over 800k and go as far as having a survey done on a house they actually admit they did'nt like..then being 'embarrased' when they survey throws up previously unmentioned issues and posts on a forum asking what to do really needs to stand back and have a good look at what on earth they are doing. I may have implied that..I was incredulous when I read what she posted. it did'nt make sense throwing money into buying a house you didnt want then agonising over it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...