Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My friend saw the workman who had just painted over it. The workman said he'd been told to paint out the graffiti but if that wasn't possible simply to paint out the offending section. He agreed that how the mural has been left, is now a real gift to graffiti artists, a blank canvas in fact.

I don't think it's about the artistic merit of the mural (it's rather naive, in fact), but rather that it is/was part of the community and people enjoyed it. It also looked nice over the playground. But now the space looks even worse than it did before and is ironically open to being targeted by the very graffiti it was covering.


I honestly think it can be restored if the council were to take the time and spend some ??. It would entail removing the offending blue paint and subsequent graffiti underneath and having someone to basically repaint the areas that were damaged (ie, where the original mural paint were stripped away). The mural itself is not that old and is on brick as opposed to something more fragile like gesso on plaster so it could probably handle the process.


Thanks for the link, will send off an email to the appropriate drone at Southwark.

As Goose Green lies on the boundaries of a few wards, probably best to write to all of the following councillors:


East Dulwich

james.barber@southwark.gov.uk

jonathan.mitchell@southwark.gov.uk

richard.thomas@southwark.gov.uk


South Camberwell

peter.john@southwark.gov.uk

jenny@greensouthwark.org

veronica.ward@southwark.gov.uk


Peckham Rye

aubyn.graham@southwark.gov.uk

evrim.laws@southwark.gov.uk

robert.smeath@southwark.gov.uk

Am I the only one to feel that the local cultural significance of the mural runs even deeper than is evident? Surely it is a direct historical reference to the fact that mind altering substances have been for sale in Peckham since the 18th century.

The local press are on to it... graffiti cover up is the official line but there are apparent plans to restore the original mural,

PM me to air any individual concerns or comments!!! Might have been nice to have discussed this before painting over it?

DY

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As Goose Green lies on the boundaries of a few

> wards, probably best to write to all of the

> following councillors:

>

> East Dulwich

> james.barber@southwark.gov.uk

> jonathan.mitchell@southwark.gov.uk

> richard.thomas@southwark.gov.uk

>

> South Camberwell

> peter.john@southwark.gov.uk

> jenny@greensouthwark.org

> veronica.ward@southwark.gov.uk

>

> Peckham Rye

> aubyn.graham@southwark.gov.uk

> evrim.laws@southwark.gov.uk

> robert.smeath@southwark.gov.uk


NOTE: Richard Thomas has already responded on this thread and by e-mail:


see below:

  Quote
Dear Richard


Graffiti removal is carried out on our behalf by Southwark Cleaning and

I have forwarded this e-mail on for their comment.


Regards


Jon


-----Original Message-----

From: Thomas, Richard

Sent: 21 September 2008 19:46

To: Davies, Gill; membersenquiries; Sheaff, Jon

Cc: Ian Whitehouse

Subject: FW: Blake Mural



Dear Gill and Jon


Please could you go to this link and and view the pictures. Why was

this done to the mural?


Best wishes



Cllr Richard Thomas,

Liberal Democrat, East Dulwich.

www.richardthomas.org.uk

I've been informed that the mural's actually in the Lane Ward so the councillors for that are:


susan.jones@southwark.gov.uk

mark.glover@southwark.gov.uk

gordon.nardell@southwark.gov.uk


Tessa Jowell's office contacted me to let me know that they "have contacted the local councillors and also Southwark to add Tessa Jowell's concerns to those already expressed."


Which is nice.

I have received this:


Dear


I've spoken with my colleague Bimal Kotecha in the Public Realm section who deals with this area. He tells me that as the mural is on private property, there there will have been an agreement between the vicarage and the council to carry out this painting. The Parks team are going to visit the vicarage on Wednesday to agree what will happen with the wall, i.e whether the mural will be restored.


If you have any further questions, Bimal can be contacted directly on 020 7525 0814 or bimal.kotecha@southwark.gov.uk.


Thank you very much for contacting us about this.


Regards

Katherine


Edited again to remove reference to the Dulwich Society as I realised the above was not in response to my email to them but to an email to someone else, duh.

> I've spoken with my colleague Bimal Kotecha in the

> Public Realm section who deals with this area. He

> tells me that as the mural is on private property,

> there there will have been an agreement between

> the vicarage and the council to carry out this

> painting.


As I mentioned in an earlier post, this exact thing happened to a youth group in SE1 who had painted a mural on the side of the building that they meet in. Also to some land belonging to Network Rail on the South Bank (ditto a community mural which NR had agreed to being painted). In neither case did Southwark Cleaning obtain the permission of the building owners before painting out large sections of the artwork, as there was a huge fuss about it and complaints galore, just as there are here.


I am very certain of there was no permission in respect of the youth group mural as I was heavily involved with them at the time and I still have copies of the letters from Southwark Council which assert that, because the mural was on a public street, albeit a private building, they had the right to paint it out. This was eventually amended to "we had complaints from the neighbours and weren't able get in touch with anyone from the group" (despite the fact it is part funded by Southwark Council and even appears in their own directory). We didn't even get an apology. This was a few years back so maybe internal procedure has got better, but I'm not convinced at this stage.

I'm heartbroken to see the mural painted over.


Art and local artists have been at the heart of re-generating the Bellenden area (Anthony Gormley, John Latham, Tom Phillips, Zandra Rhodes and many others), building on historic artistic links such as association of Peckham Rye with William Blake. The mural transformed the immediate area when it was painted and is treasured by many/all who live in the area.


The mural with graffiti is infinitely preferable to a bare wall with no mural and no graffiti. The ideal, obviously, would be for the council to maintain the mural and keep it free of graffiti.


According to Wikipedia, the orginal artist was Stan Peskett:


Wikipedia entry for Peckham


Stan has a website at the following addess:


Stan Peskett


which includes an item on the William Blake Mural:


William Blake Mural


I'll email Stan to see if he's aware of the damage to the mural and if he still lives in the area.


On his site, he talks about a similar incident in 1997:


"In 1997 part of the mural was stolen brick by brick. Unfortunately neither the Local Member of Parliament Tessa Jowell nor the local church that used the mural for fund raising purposes wanted help in the reinstatement of the mural. Even though it has become a historic fixture and featured in the tour guide books along with the Globe theatre for the London Borough of Southwark."


Unlike 1997, on this occasion we know who is reponsible. And hopefully, some kind of concensus can be achieved on re-instating the mural.

I have emailed Bimal Kotecha (see above) and asked him to let me know the outcome of the council's discussions with the vicarage tomorrow.


I'll post on here as soon as I have any news. Won't be till after tomorrow night though as I'm out all day and evening.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We have been patients at Sternhall Lane for years. Our experience has generally been incredibly positive with speedy responses and very helpful staff. We are generally fortunate to get a same day appointment should we really need one either at Sternhall Lane or at Tessa Jowell and any necessary referalls have been swift. 
    • @Alice if left might have been stolen/taken by someone (peed on by a dog or fox), also there are some little things attached of - I assume - sentimental value. I hope the owner can claim them. Will leave a note indeed with info how to retrieve them, though not with a private phone number in a public space 😅 Maybe a friend of a friend will come across this post on EDF.  @embob97 They do have a ring, sorry. 
    • Agree but not so great for the independently owned cafes shops etc.
    • My husband goes to the newish one near the Watchpolisher on Lordship Lane.(sorry cant remember name-) I can assure you they're not 'fake'  He started going there because his excellent long-term barber had to rent a chair there when the shop he used to work from in Forest Hill closed. I think one needs to be careful when making statements like that above as it can damage reputable buisnesses. Also I should add the Barbers I mention always seems to be busy
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...