Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just phoned to ask for a pre book appointment and was advised that all that they have is on the day appointments which as we all know you need to que or phone on the day for.


Can they do this? Is it possible for a surgery to not offer any pre book appointments at all?

Dulwichfox, that's great if you have the ability to get there and queue.


For people with kids to get to school, it's ridiculous. I need an appointment, one that will involve me having to arrange childcare for my youngest, and at the moment it's an impossibility with DMC. I can't queue at 8am, can't spend 30 mins on the phone trying to get through to them at the same time as taking children to school, and can't arrange childcare at the drop of a hat if I'm then told they can see me in 30 minutes.


A complete and utter shambles.

Have you formally complained to the surgery practice manager? How has s/he responded? You could also complain to the CCG who commission the service.


Will they be releasing more non-urgent appointments next week? Some practices release the non-urgent appointments in batches.


Of course, the alternative is to move surgeries. There does seem to be a disproportionate number of threads about this practice.

My daughter had some tests on the 14th Feb. After repeated calls I was told first they were not back - they were on the 19th; second by the 26th when I went in I was told they still had not been looked at but they had been put in a Doctors box who was in fact absent; third on the 28th I was told half the results had been looked at but then the Dr had gone home and had left them half checked. I went in again yesterday and was told they had atill not been checked but that I could make an appt for today which would " the Dr you see will have to check them in front of you" and finally after I almost had to stage a sit in a GP finally looked at them and agreed my daughter needed to see a Consultant. While all this went on yesterday, another patient behind me said he had been waiting for six weeks for his test results having been told first they were not back; second they had not been checked and so on and so on. A really poor and almost disdainful service.

Whereas I received letter yesterday asking me to make a telephone appointment with the doctor to discuss my urine sample results....I never gave a sample and neither has anyone else in my household.


Anyone happen to be waiting for a urine sample result?

Stories like that told by hat282 sadden me.


I work at King's; I work in a laboratory, generating test results and sending them out. As soon as I know the result of a test I e-mail those results to the consultant who commissioned the test, and if the paper trail provides me with an e-mail address for a GP involved in the care of the patient in question, I put him or her in copy.


For that information to gather dust... well, it's not the laboratory's doing. But I apologise for us all, as truly I am sorry that this should be going on.

Alex K, when we went for the bloods we had to go to the childrens unit at Kings. I parked and paid for two hours on the meter but we were in and out in precisely 28 minutes from car to unit and back. The person dealing with my daughter could not have been more caring and gentle. I made all of these points to DMC when battling for the results - the NHS is such a precious resource so why waste time and money sending patients for tests that they won't look at?

Hat282, this also happend with my blood tests, I wrote about on another thread. My results were sitting in an inbox too of a GP no longer at the practice. I did attempt to raise this with the practice manager who never called me back.

However, I did also raise ut with PALS and would urge anyone to do the same.


I realise moving surgery seems the obvious answer but there are some truly great GP's at the practice and I am very happy with them. That argument is wearing more and more thin though as it is getting impossible to see them.

I would suggest that everyone writes to PALS - or even local press. I work in the health and Social Care sector and always advise my clients to do the above if they feel they have had a poor service. I know from mine and colleagues experiences in our field that one complaint may not generate much interest with the 'powers that be' but a steady trickle or a vast number does eventually produce results. Is there a Health Ombudsman - I think there is
Pre-bookable appointments at the end of March is a step forward from when I last tried to get an appointment and was told that none at all were pre-bookable, it was all by triage on the day. I used to think this surgery was fantastic but I work and I can't wait around on the off chance of an appointment. So I left and went elsewhere. And they wonder why so many people go to A&E with minor problems... Perhaps DMC just have more patients than they can cope with. As a consolation to those who remain, this might not be the case for too much longer, and then you'll be ok again! The Gardens and the Nunhead surgery both get good feedback on here.

I am not at DMC (thank goodness) - but it strikes me that there are good and competent (salaried I think) GPs working there, entirely hampered by a wholly dysfunctional administration system (and at the very least a poor or missing practice manager). Failures to give effective and timely feedback on test results (and to match results with patients) is an issue of results distribution and performance targeting. The appalling appointments non-system is clearly an office management issue. People do not cancel appointments I would guess because they have little incentive to phone for hours, and none to actually visit the surgery just to cancel an appointment.


Numbers of surgeries are moving now to computer mediated systems, allowing appointments to be booked (and cancelled) on line ? as well as repeat prescriptions to be ordered and so on. This allows staff to concentrate on those who do not have access to computers (or who are unable to use them through infirmity or lack of instruction). But of course such systems require (a) investment and (b) proper training ? something the DMC owner(s) are clearly very unwilling to put into the practice. It is now possible to set up automated calls (or texts) to remind patients of appointments, again to avoid no-shows.


Finally a system of triage to get any appointment, and then only on-the-day, places anyone with a chronic condition which needs monitoring (or with work or care commitments) at a severe disadvantage. This should be seen as entirely unacceptable (except perhaps for a very short period reflecting either a local epidemic or practitioner illness) ? indeed offering booked appointments for non-critical illness issues should be a formal requirement placed on any practice which wishes to contract with the NHS to offer primary care.

I've left DMC for 106 Medical Centre for exactly this reason. The GPs when you see them are great but getting an appt is impossible. For someone with a job and two young kids it was just ridiculous. So far my experience of 106 has been great - easy to get appointments and a lovely doctor (you even get to see the same doctor more than once which was impossible at DMC).


One thing to note when I was still with DMC and was told that I couldn't pre-book my son's routine vacinations until the were overdue by nearly two months (setting his whole vacination schedule back) I complained to the medical ombudsman - suddenly an appointment became available.

I still left as the service was just too bad.

The appt system is chabging again at dmc, notice in window appears to suggest that you wont be given an appt until a doc calls you back to establish whether its necessary or not - seems like a pretty dire system to me. i cannot understand how a surgery can get its admin so wrong. i have been with dmc for 13yrs and its saving grace is one or two exceptional doctors but everytime i encounter the appt system i am tempted to leave...

Yes I think leaving is probably the answer which is so sad as I truly like some of GP's there. I was also hoping to be pregnant again soon and am holding out as I would like the service of the lanes again.


But we cant go on like this, it is madness

I wonder if The Lanes have almost had an adverse effect on the surgery. In that lots of women who are planning to have children register with them. This leads to them having a lot of young families on their books, patients who by and large use a docor a LOT more than your average patient. Which in turn leads to problems getting appointments etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...