Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Southbank? Place to walk, rin and scoot and enjoy the spring like weather. Always buskers around, Not sure what is on at the southbank, but I always enjoyed taking my daughter here, also so nice and quite weekday.

Greenwich .... Maritime museum, walk around Cutty sark, play in the park?

Childrens museum in bethnal green has things on during the day.


I know this is not central london as such, but were and are my top places!

Thank you so much, Hazelnunhead & Canela! Greenwich is sounding very inviting.


Canela - I would love to take her to see the Lion King but think she might be a bit too young to concentrate that long.


I wonder if there are any theatres showing some of the popular children shows. Anyone know?

The Discover Story Centre in Stratford is amazing and worth avoiding the crowds by going on a weekday. We also love the Museum of London. I have a blog here of days out in London I've done with my 3 yo if you want more inspiration!


www.toddlertrips.wordpress.com




Have fun.

Thank you so much! Hadn't heard of the Discover Story Centre before and have just checked their website. Sounds awesome and easy to get to, thanks to the overground to Canada Water. Her main excitement about Friday (for now) is that we'll be going on a train so this should tick all the boxes:-)


Thanks again, everyone


Scareyt: thanks for flagging your blog. Will check it out for even more tips: -)

The Polka theatre in Wimbledon is magical there's also the Unicorn in Londn Bridge.


Otherwise my little one loved the Crown Jewels at the Tower of London but she was about 8 months older than yours when we went.


I send The Discovery Centre mentioned above.

For another day... I second the Museum of London (we used to live nearby and went there often) and also Greenwich. We make a trip of it by train to london bridge and then the boat (cut through from station near Hayes Galleria) to Greenwich. If you get bored of the Maritime museum & park, you could get the boat one stop further instead and go on the Cable Car. I would do the 360 there and back trip as the other side is a bit desolate but my kids love it. Plus you can then go and eat/drink by the Dome and get the tube one stop to Canada Water and then on overground home (all step free).


I think we are going to try the Crown Jewels this weekend as I have a princess obsessed four yr old!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is why the NFU are so unhappy that Clarkson is involved as it distracts from the issues for real farmers. Your assumption that all land is purchased as a tax dodge is a wide sweeping dog whistle generalisation and, I suspect, a long way from the truth but something to government would love for people to think. Again, read this: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62jdz61j3yo          
    • Anyone got any feedback on Transgender Awareness Week over the last week? I don't. And neither has my wife. And neither have my sisters. And neither has my mum, nor my daughter   x
    • It's an estate that they have been gifted. They may choose to earn a living from it, or to sell all, or part of it. In many cases, the land will only have been purchased as a way to avoid tax (as is the case for people like Clarkson, Dyson and other individuals with significant land holdings) and has little to do with farming at all. The idea that if I give you land worth £3m + tomorrow Rocks, it's not an massive windfall, but simply a necessary tool that you need to earn a living is silly. It's no different from someone inheriting any other estate where they would usually be required to pay 40% tax and settle up immediately.  If you're opposed to any tax on those inheriting multi-million pound estates - I would be interested in who you would like to place a greater tax burden upon? Or do you simply think we should watch public services collapse even further.
    • Because it's only a windfall if they sell it - until that time it is an asset - and in this case a working asset but, as far a the government is concerned a taxable asset. The farm is the tool that they use to earn a living - a living that they will be taxed on in the same way a nurse is - it's just to do their job they are now expected to pay extra tax for the privilege - just because the farm was passed to them. Or are you advocating nurses pay tax on the tools they are provided to do their job too? 😉  Now, if they sell the farm then yes, they should pay inheritance tax in the same way people who are left items of value from relatives are because they have realised the value and taken the asset as cash.  Our farming industry is built upon family business - generations of farmers from the same families working the land and this is an ideological attack and, like so many of Labour's policies, is aimed at a few rich farmers/farm owners (insert pensioners on Fuel Duty), but creates collateral damage for a whole load of other farmers who aren't rich (insert 50,000 pensioners now struggling in relative poverty due to Winter Fuel) and will have to sell land to fund it because, well, they are farmers who don't earn much at all doing a very tough job - the average wage of someone in agriculture is, according to the BBC around £500 a week and the national average is £671. Do you see the point now and why so many farmers are upset about this? It's another tax the many to get to the few. Maybe farmers should wear Donkey jackets rather than Barbour's and the government may look on them a little more favourably.... Some good background from the BBC on why farmers are fighting so hard. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62jdz61j3yo
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...