Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In today's post I received a Confirmation of Voter Registration 2014 from Southwark Council. It has my name and nationality correct but does NOT have the Opt Out (of inclusion in edited register for sale) column ticked. It also has my address in the form [House Number] E22 9NF, London, [Actual Postcode].


I've always selected Opt Out since the option was introduced, and made no change when I last submitted my details online, via the Electoral Reform Society site, on 4 October 2013. My screen shots and a confirmation email from ERS, all of the same date, all confirm that I had selected Opt Out.


I'll be contacting the Southwark electoral registration office and James Barber about this, with copies of the evidence. I very much hope hope it's the case that Southwark are not yet selling the relevant edited edition.


I assume this hasn't happened just to me.


[Edited to enable proper display of the erroneous address: Phorum as configured treated my angle brackets as HTML commands. I have now emailed Southwark and James B]

We had the same anomaly. My understanding is it's not a mistake, they are requiring everyone to pro actively opt out again.


Not impressed.


I just called them. If you renewed your details on line apparently there was no option to (re) opt out, so you were set to the default (of not being opted out). The option now exists so we all need to re update it, there is a period until the end of March to finish the updates and clarifications but it's something we need to do proactively, it won't revert without action.


(Just the messenger people)

Ruffers. That seems to be it. Thanks. I do now remember looking at the change in legislation or administration, when the topic came up in a law newsgroup last year, but had expected official clarity, which in this case would have meant an accompanying explanation of the current request, rather than what looks like the same-old, and which states my _current_ status to be unopted-out.


No online option either. No Business Reply envelope, as previously. I think I shall use one from a previous year.

As ruffers said, we got our confirmation form back yesterday and suddenly were no longer opted-out.


The half hearted explanation I got yesterday from the helpline was "oh, you need to pro-actively opt-out again". That seemed to be a decision designed to make it as hard as possible for people to opt out of having their details sold for commercial purposes (or that's how it seemed to me), so I sent a pretty narky email to the Electoral Services team saying so.


What I've just been told by someone different from the Electoral Services team is that it's all a mistake and the confirmation letter is in error, and that we are all still opted out. I don't think I'll take the chance that the second explanation is the right one, so will be amending my confirmation form to opt out again and send back to them.

It's a period of transition. This is from an Electoral Commission press release:


"The Electoral Registration and Administration Act 2013, which received Royal Assent on 31 January 2013, provides for the introduction of Individual Electoral Registration. From summer 2014, each individual will need to provide their date of birth and national insurance number when they apply to register." http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/journalist/electoral-commission-media-centre/news-releases-reviews-and-research/major-change-to-electoral-registration-can-go-ahead-but-risks-to-address,-says-electoral-commission


I might look through the detailed EC stuff to see how far Southwark's practice matches their guidance (at http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/electoral-administrator/running-electoral-registration).

I've so far found that, by virtue of The Electoral Registration (Postponement of 2013 Annual Canvass) Order 2013, the 1913 annual canvass relevant date of 15 October was changed, and a postponed canvass was to be made during the period 1 October 2013 to 17 February 2014 inclusive. The regulations then state:


"3.(1) Each registration officer in England must publish a revised version of their registers by 17th February 2014."


If that's so, a serious initial question now is, How accurate are the Confirmation of Voter Registration 2014 notices that we've just received? And if they do accurately state the currently held value of our deemed Opt Out statuses, have any copies of the Edited Version already been sold?

Hi,


Southwark Council's electoral registration officer has asked me to get in touch to apologise to you for the confusion caused and clarify what has happened with the 'opting out' option on the electoral registration forms.


We have been contacted by several residents about this issue, which has now been resolved. Due to a computer glitch, the residents who indicated that they wished to opt out of the edited register when they confirmed their elector details by telephone and by internet were sent a confirmation letter that indicated that they had not opted out, when they had in fact requested this.


As soon as we were aware of this problem we contacted our software suppliers. They were able to rectify the problem, and now all the residents who had requested an opt out have had their records updated. They will be sent another confirmation letter, indicating that they do indeed have the opt out of the edited register correctly recorded.


Some of the incorrect data had been passed to four credit reference agencies. We have now contacted them and they have deleted the incorrect data, which had not been used. We have replaced this information with the correct information. We would like to reassure residents that if they had opted out, their details are not held on record by any third parties as a result of this error.


Sorry again for the confusion.


Kind regards,


Louise Neilan

Media Manager

Southwark Council

Mine is the same.. But it was my error...


Although my circumstances have not changed the last time I filled out the obligatory

for, the one you have to reply to from time to time(I do mine on line)I forgot to tick the OPT OUT Box.


I could just send back this form but not really that bothered..



DulwichFox.

louiseneilan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Some of the incorrect data had been passed to four

> credit reference agencies. We have now contacted

> them and they have deleted the incorrect data,

> which had not been used. We have replaced this

> information with the correct information. We would

> like to reassure residents that if they had opted

> out, their details are not held on record by any

> third parties as a result of this error.

>

This doesn't make sense to me, I'm afraid. Regulation 114 of the 2001 regulations explicitly permits sale of the full register to credit reference agencies. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/1871/regulation/15/made


Ed: This thread was moved, btw, from General ED Issues to the Lounge, in the last hour or two.

This is the explanation I've received from council officers:


"

From:

To: Barber, James;

Cc: Sent: Thu Feb 20 18:00:50 2014

Subject: RE: Urgent - possibility of unlawful publication


Hi James


A fuller response below:


Southwark Council's electoral registration officer has asked me to get in touch to apologise to you for the confusion caused and clarify what has happened with the 'opting out' option on the electoral registration forms.


We have been contacted by several residents about this issue, which has now been resolved. Due to a computer glitch, the residents who indicated that they wished to opt out of the edited register when they confirmed their elector details by telephone and by internet were sent a confirmation letter that indicated that they had not opted out, when they had in fact requested this.


As soon as we were aware of this problem we contacted our software suppliers. They were able to rectify the problem, and now all the residents who had requested an opt out have had their records updated. They will be sent another confirmation letter, indicating that they do indeed have the opt out of the edited register correctly recorded.


Some of the incorrect data had been passed to four credit reference agencies. We have now contacted them and they have deleted the incorrect data, which had not been used. We have replaced this information with the correct information. We would like to reassure residents that if they had opted out, their details are not held on record by any third parties as a result of this error.


Kind regards,

"


Not yet clear who will be landed with the bill of resending all this informaiton to tens of thousands of people at 50p a shot.

  • 7 months later...

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In today's post I received a Confirmation of Voter

> Registration 2014 from Southwark Council. It has

> my name and nationality correct but does NOT have

> the Opt Out (of inclusion in edited register for

> sale) column ticked. It also has my address in

> the form E22 9NF, London, .

>

> I've always selected Opt Out since the option was

> introduced, and made no change when I last

> submitted my details online, via the Electoral

> Reform Society site, on 4 October 2013. My screen

> shots and a confirmation email from ERS, all of

> the same date, all confirm that I had selected

> Opt Out.

>

> I'll be contacting the Southwark electoral

> registration office and James Barber about this,

> with copies of the evidence. I very much hope

> hope it's the case that Southwark are not yet

> selling the relevant edited edition.

>

> I assume this hasn't happened just to me.

>

>


I followed this thread from earlier this year (apologies for only quoting this message - I couldn't work out how to reference the whole thread) and contacted Southwark to re-confirm my opt-out. Today I have found out that I am NOT opted out and various organisations have bought my details via the electoral roll. Southwark are very apologetic and have reinstated my opt out. I'm letting the forum know in case the same thing has happened to others.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would disagree that the tables outside the Blue Brick bothered nobody. They were not within the cafe's curtilage (one table was even placed on the other side of the road!) but on a narrow public footpath where pedestrians have a "public right of way". Added to that, some customers rearranged the tables so the footpath was blocked completely. 
    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...