Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyne know about this technology - I remember the name from a few years back as being the oirganisation that enable swapping of copyright music material.


I heard last night that for ?12.95 a month it is possible to subscribe to Napster and have instant download / access to over 6m tracks to your PC and via that to a household music system.


The technology sounds interesting - but not sure what hardawre I'd need to actually transmit the music from the PC and ten around the house / into specific rooms. As I was told it's possible for teeenagers to be accessing pop music in bedroom while parents listen to 60's rock and teenage musician listen to Vanessa Mae violins.



Any clues anyone?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4149-napster/
Share on other sites

Morning MM


I've gone through the whole gamut with Napster - back in the original outlaw days (when you could get tracks long impossible to get on CD as people uploaded vinyl conversions) to the current legit version. I went for the subscription model and I don't know about 6 million tracks but it's pretty exhaustive. I haven't got any hi-tec solution to playing the music - a simple pair of phonos to jack cable from the laptop to the amplifier does the job


Quality is absolutely fine for checking albums out, listening to stuff you had forgotten about or general background music - but it's no replacement for a proper copy.


I do like being able to tee up a couple of dozen songs on the playlist and then forget about it


I wasn't aware of the multistreaming aspect - I might check it out later and get back to you. I suspect there are people better qualified than I to help with any hardware setup, but I'm happy to help if I can

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4149-napster/#findComment-131927
Share on other sites

Lookie here for a review of various different methods of sending your music about the house - http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/09/05/roundup_music_streamers/ - we've got Squeezeboxes of different incarnations.


I don't get involved with Napster though. Last.fm but that's more radio, have a look.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4149-napster/#findComment-131976
Share on other sites

CDonline,


Trent appears to echo your sentiments, Slipknot dude too... :))


http://torrentfreak.com/nine-inch-nails-frontman-was-a-member-of-oink-071031/


http://torrentfreak.com/slipknot-frontman-says-record-labels-cause-piracy-080910/


And has released a fair bit of material for free lately, both online and leaving new material in usb thumb drives in club toilets etc too...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4149-napster/#findComment-132129
Share on other sites

Sooo....should one be feeling nefarious and looking to download music for nowt where would one hypothetically look?


When I was a younger man, WinMX was the thing to use but I have no idea if it still is. I once looked (and, god help me, tried) at Kazaa and the thing nearly took over my computer with pop-ups and adverts and icons all over the bloody place.


Secondly, if, hypothetically, someone was to download this stuff is it possible to then put it onto one's ipod or iphone or do they only accept files from itunes?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4149-napster/#findComment-132133
Share on other sites

OMG David Carnell - just the mention of Kazaa has resurrected long-buried memories/nightmares. It pretty much ruined 2 pcs of mine


These days I only ever use online freebies if the track definitely isn't available anywhere else. Or if the artist in questions says they aren't bothered.


So, when I am consumed by the need to hear Shep Pettibone's 12" mix of the Psychedlic Furs track; Shock, I use....


Soulseek

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4149-napster/#findComment-132195
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...