Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Apologies for asking this on Family forum but feel it's only bit of EDF I know some folk on!


Our neighbours did their kitchen a few years ago (4-5 can't quite remember) and they extended sideways - we signed a party wall agreement with them. We now would like to extend sideways ourselves - using the shared wall as agreed all those years ago.


Our neighbour mentioned he wanted us to contribute towards the cost of the wall he put up since we will now be using it. Does anyone know if this is standard practice? We signed the agreement partly to keep good relations with the neighbours and partly with a view to perhaps extending ourselves and to be honest we would probably not be doing it were the wall not already built.


any replies much appreciated!!

thanks

Lucy

Was this written into the original agreement? I have no idea if it is normal practice, but a few calls around to party wall surveyors could shed some light. I suppose it depends a bit on how much they are asking for, and if they take off the period of time already used etc.


I would get some legal advice though. In my experience party walls can cause a good deal of mistrust between neighbours.....

I don't think any money clause was written into the agreement - just the fact that it was a shared wall which could potentially be actually 'shared' if we build up to it.


My project manager has not come across it before. I don't want to create animosity between us already before the project even starts (not due to start till end of summer - still in planning permission stage) but at same time it sounds odd. It's ok if it's a few hundreds but if we are talking thousands well then...

It does sound very odd, though checking things out properly legally sounds like a very good idea. Having been on both sides of the building / being built upon divide, I would have thought that your getting to use this wall now is fair compensation for the noise and inconvenience you would have experienced when they were doing their work. If I was your neighbour, it wouldn't occur to me to ask for this!

Chunky neighbour!

You're polite and naturally averse to having a falling-out.


This kind of near-blackmail appeals to certain people. Having once been a victim of it I would say: don't just give in at this point, but get ready to make a compromise.

OK so how do you progress?


Before it gets to any legal stage

(costs ??? and *polite cough* solicitors relish a nice lucrative dispute rather than promoting harmony)....


Ask your builder what he would charge for all the new wall you'd need there if starting from scratch?

What can you afford right now?

Find out, preferably over a glass of wine, what amount of money is the neighbour looking for?


Is there a reasonable amount you can now agree upon?

They have a right to charge you for use of the wall according to the info available on party walls - although I think most neighbours would waive this if they previously asked you to endure the noise and disturbance of their works! Bit more understandable if ownership of properties has since changed hands.


https://www.gov.uk/party-wall-etc-act-1996-guidance


Hope that helps.

Its totally normal that if you use the wall, you pay for half the costs of building it. It is completely natural that you should pay your share towards to cost of creating a wall that will now form part of your house. While you may have endured the noise the first time around, they will endure it now.


I don't see how the noise argument comes into since she is now doing her own side return extension...

I am not saying I will not pay some contribution towards the wall. Just wondering if anyone has been through it and how much would be reasonable to ask. After all if we had contested this wall years ago they would not have been able to build it - we have lost most of the natural light and endured a lot of noise - not during building but from the endless parties and gatherings since. With 5 skylights I can frequently hear the conversations as if I was in the room.


Anyway....

I've been through this with neighbours and 50% of the costs to build it as quoted by a reputable builder is standard practice. It's not much money-- depending on the size of the wall your share will be at most a couple of grand.


We agreed to a wall on the boundary line as we knew we wanted to do our own extension eventually (as it sounds like you did). Altruism didn't really come into it. Also, we couldn't have blocked our neighbour's extension if we didn't consent to the party-wall notification. It would have simply required a surveyor to determine access rights, hours of work etc which is a totally unncessary expense if you can agree these points amongst yourselves as decent neighbours. Since what our neighbours did was within their PD rights, at most we could have forced them to build the wall 6 inches over on their side and then we would never have the right to use it.


Noisy / party-mad neigbours is a totally different can of worms and really doesn't have anything to do with sharing the costs of constructing a wall. If they really are that inconsiderate though I feel for you as that's terrible.

I will find out the cost. Thanks for your reply. I don't think my neighbours are inconsiderate BTW I think given the right conditions in the summer the noise just carries... Just wondering what the cost was when they build it - it won't be the same now as it was some time ago.


Did you sign anything or go through any legalities?

Yes, we incorporated the idea in our party wall notice from the begining so it would be clear. The costs were also the costs when they did it, not what it cost when we did it. If you haven't already agreed it in writing, you probably legally don't have to pay anything but I just wanted you to know that your neighbours aren't asking for something totally crazy. When you actually share the party-wall for the side extension its fairly normal. I hope that helps.
We are on the other side of the fence: our neighbours asked if they can use our wall (built on our side as at the time they didn't want it on the boundary). We asked our builder how much just that wall would have cost, neighbours asked theirs, the difference I think was 100 pounds, so we agreed in the middle between their quote and ours. Got the check and signed all paperwork, was all straightforward. Good luck.
I wonder if the split should be 50-50 though? After all, the neighbours have had the benefit of the wall for 4-5 years longer than the OP. Something like 60-40 or 55-45 feels more fair although there is no science behind these numbers! Good luck - not at all easy doing these types of negotiations with neighbours.
Reckon definitely worth doing it face to face - people find it harder to be greedy in person! But go with an idea of what you think is reasonable in mind - then you can nicely but firmly come to an agreement. Awkward and i think cheeky of this neighbour! But putting some money his way probably worth it to keep relations sweet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • of course most people would avoid the "stupid" term - but I'm sticking with it fact is no other European would be so dumb, and even with the same information, the  same media, the same everything, 2 of the countries within the UK saw ho stupid an idea it was - but only the English (who played a large part in the Welsh result) pushed ahead - there is something defiantly arrogant and stupid and it isn't just down to bad info and bad leadership But that was all 2016 - it's people in 2025 who claim it to be a good idea executed badly who are especially stupid Now - does calling people stupid help anyone? It's not especially politically gainful and just gets peoples' backs up - but it remains a truth and only when the country as a whole genuinely holds it's hands up and admits the stupidity (rather than downplaying it as a poor decision - no shade meant Mal - you are just nicer and politer than me) will it begin. to turn the tide Also worth mentioning that yes I am as intractable and blunt with friends and family who voted Leave as well - this isn't me hiding behind some online anonymous account. This is what I'm like
    • Hello My name is Lizzie and I work locally as a dog walker and nanny. I won’t be needed over Summer so will have full availability for a dogsitting job. I have a DBS certificate and will provide several dogsitting references as well. Please note that I can only watch your pet at your home since they are sadly not allowed in my flat! Looking forward to hear from you
    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...