Jump to content

Recommended Posts

>>My initial point was that some of the outlandishness at Pride does little to increase acceptance among those have pre-existing prejudices and don't come into contact with members of the gay community on a regular basis.


This reminds me of the people who said of the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence "Well you know, he was no angel himself."


That is very, very flimsy indeed.


he percentage of the black population who actually use the word "n*gger" is 'hardly any of them'.



They do in Spike Lee films.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what is the percentage of the population who

> use a word relating to the colour of someone's

> skin to mean "sh*t" as compared to the percentage

> of the population who use a word relating to

> someone's sexuality to mean "sh*t"?


This has nothing to do with nothing.


All I'm saying - as you FULL WELL know, is that if most gay people are using the word 'gay' to mean 'a bit rubbish' - even if oh-so-ironically whenever they feel like it, then I'm afraid you're going to have a hard time explaining to a ten year old why it's so wrong for Moyles to do it.


Glass houses / Stones.

Bob, you keep banging on about this, but I don't see how important this is. Do gay men and women use the word gay to mean rubbish or crap?


I use lots of words to describe myself and others, homo, poof or faggot for instance. I don't use them as a put down, abuse or to bully anybody. I also don't believe that by using these words, that this is a reason for others to use them in an abusive way. In the same way, I would never shout any of these words to a complete stranger in the street.


Why can't a 10 year old be told why it is wrong to use the word gay as a derogative term?

cdonline Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bob, you keep banging on about this, but I don't

> see how important this is. Do gay men and women

> use the word gay to mean rubbish or crap?


The reason I'm 'banging on' about it is because it was the whole point of the thread which James started, as opposed to all the other guff since it did start - which is wholly unconnected.


Yes - they do. So, essentially, it's hard to complain when other people do it. And even harder to explain to a ten year old the subtlety of the difference.

So if a white person uses the word "n*gger" it's "hard to complain - because black people do it?


You make no sense whatsoever! You are totally contradicting yourself.


I never use the word "gay" to mean crap - and nor do any of my gay or straight friends. If they did I would correct them. Gay is a sexuality - it describes the way some people are.


Why is it okay to use it as a derogotary term? If someone used the word "spastic" in this way you would condemn it.

Is there an icon for pulling your t-shirt over your head an moonwalking backwards out of the door?


James - it's clear that one this one you'll do absolutely anything but acknowledge some basic facts. Either that or you and your gay friends are living in a bubble entirely separate from the rest of the gay population.


I'll be off now.

And because I'm pretty sure that, whereas everyone on this thread would agree that shouting "Qu**r", "Ba**y Boy" "Fa**ot" at someone in the street in an agressive or threatening manner is abusive and wrong, not everyone agrees that using the term "gay" to mean rubbish is in the same league.

It's a bit sad that some people are still happy to turn a blind eye to flagrant double standards.


It is you who is living in a weird bubble Bob - where it's perfectly acceptable to use a word that describes someone's sexuality as a slur.


By the way Citizen, I didn't say that this is the same as someone shouting homophobic abuse at you in the street but thanks for twisting my words again.


The word "gay" is unique in being used like this. Do you not understand this yet? It is a pretty basic and simple point. I can't keep repeating myself if you're determined not to listen.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hopefully though, everyone would agree that Chris

> Moyles is a tw@t!


So you think it's OK to use a woman's sexual organs as a derogatory term? ;-)


Complaining about the hijacking of the word 'Gay' is sweetly ironic. I wonder if there was all this broo-ha-ha years back when people realised they could no longer admit to being in a gay mood?

We are talking about the gay word being used to mean "sh*t" - not "camp" or anything else.


No other word to describe a minority is used like this so openly and pervasively.


I have repeated this numerous times. You must be illiterate. If I were bigoted I would say "how gay of you".


Do you understand now?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This leaflet has the tone of a social media post emanating from Mar-a-Largo at 2am. The Lib Dems adopting the vernacular of the far right. Truly shameful.  What constitutes a RADICAL MARXIST? Is that distinct from a moderate marxist (lower case)? Cultural Marxist is used in right-wing circles as code to disparage Jews. So, exactly what is a RADICAL MARXIST, Lib Dems? Perhaps James Barber could pop like a low-rent (but equally annoying) Microsoft paperclip to explain: “Hi, looks like you’re thinking of voting for a Marxist…”
    • lol! The Greens have picked up a bunch of support into the last few months precisely because they have gone much further to the left. If you wanted a leaflet that made disaffected Labour voters aware that there was a leftist alternative to Labour in Dulwich, and to reassure mainstream Labour voters feel like the Corbynite fringe was fucking off at long last, then this is what it would look like.  Meanwhile the Lib Dems' solution to SEND and social care funding crises, a failure to build any private or social housing, climate change and all the rest is..."community wardens". 🤣 They really seem to be out of tune with the state of the country at the moment: it's crazy that they could have observed the comms failure of Starmer's incremental managerialism and thought to themselves, "you know what people want? More of that attitude, but with even less impact".
    • Ollie's is another restaurant concept from the same people that do the Megan's chain. It was pretty mercilessly mocked on a thread somewhere on here. The Megan's branch on Lordship Lane closed not that long after it opened for a rebirth as an Ollie's, but it didnt seem to have happened last time I noticed. The Crown & Greyhound is closed until Thu 19 March for renovations (and staff training, hopefully...). The Romeo Jones booze and entertainment licence application closes for comments sometime this week. Simba Dulwich Ltd is the applicant. https://southlondon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/london-borough-of-southwark-simba-dulwich-ltd-premises-licence-1.pdf  
    • I don't know whose idea in the Lib Dems it was to put round a flyer saying that James' radical Marxist (in red caps) views are "at odds with East Dulwich and Goose Green residents", plus a load of ridiculous alarmist b******s. They may like to know that putting this round has had the opposite effect on me to that presumably intended. In local elections I usually vote for individuals who I think will do a good job  rather than  voting for particular parties, but as far as I am concerned the Lib Dems have shot themselves in the foot with the contents of this flyer, because I shan't be voting for any of them.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...