Jump to content

UK Drug Policy: Call for an impact assessment and cost benefit analysis.


Recommended Posts

The petition calling for an impact assessment of the UK's drug policy has amassed an incredible 99,110 signatures, a mere 890 short of the 100,000 needed to force a debate in Parliament. With just short of 48 hours left to reach that target, it would be a great pity if it were to come so far to fall at the last hurdle. Please consider signing if you haven't already done so.


http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/45969


As this is a government petition, you will need to click on the verifying email to register your vote.

They've already responded with a 'but look what we're doing aren't we marvellous' which actually amounts to very little of substance (no pun intended), despite some very good recommendations, and some bleating about education and prevention.

Meanwhile business as usual.

It's hard to imagine how much more of a pickle the current 'policy' on drugs (if you could call it that) could be in.


Old-skool drugs more readily available than ever, with more variable contents. Police policy is largely toleration - unless you get plain unlucky, or they have some other purpose (such as getting somewhere closed down, getting some arrest numbers on paper). The current cycle of tail-chasing over legal highs (legal to illegal high, change a molecule, back to legal etc etc) has set the template for years to come - in a way much more worrying than trad drugs imo.


Anyway; chances of any real change to the status quo are about as likely as .. say .. a ban on landings at Heathrow prior to 7am. It aint gonna happen!

> 99,110 signatures, a mere 890 short of the 100,000 needed to force a debate in Parliament.


"needed to be considered for debate" is more accurate. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/backbench-business-committee/e-petitions-/#jump-link-0

True, considered would have been more accurate. Anyway moving on, it's reached its target so a debate may be on the cards. Long overdue, imo.


As for countries with more successful drug policies, Portugal seems to have had some success with theirs since they moved to decriminalise: http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html


Other than that, it's worth keeping an eye on Uruguay which legalised cannabis last December, and those US states that have done the same.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I recently had a utility room built, next to the kitchen. Dean Richards and his team carried out the works, they did a fantastic job. Thorough, with attention to every detail.  If you are considering an extension, refurbishment or renovation, Dean comes highly recommended.  Dean Richards  07888 651798  
    • Thanks to all for the comments and advice.  I have now reported the incident to the police.
    • Thanks everyone for your comments, all of which I’ve taken something from. I originally posted to warn and help others learn from my experience – hence the title, first and last words of the post. However, the process of posting and reading your comments has helped me better make sense of what felt ‘off’ about the incident, why and what I’d do differently next time. I hadn’t expected this outcome, so thank you.  It’s also yielded several ‘golden nugget’ insights, one of which I share here for others. For context, I’m a longtime SE22 resident, who lives on a street with a primary school, so am used to scooting, cycling, walking with buggies, small children, pets etc. I like where I live and have never been struck on a pavement by anyone, on wheels or otherwise. I’ve been fortunate. When walking down Carlton Avenue towards Dulwich Village yesterday, I was on the left-hand side of the pavement but – ‘golden nugget’ approaching – not as close to people’s front garden walls as I could have been. The cyclist came from behind and overtook on the inside i.e. passed between me and the wall. The gap was too narrow and he hit my leg. For clarity, my original post was about the lack of adult supervision of a child. There’s been much comment here about the cyclist’s age. I didn’t know he was 4, until his father told me. I felt that this was a tactic – along with telling me I was over-reacting, talking about intent, apologising undercut with ‘but’ and laughing – to downplay and avoid taking responsibility for his part in the situation. But I accept that is my perception, readers weren’t there and may think differently. What also felt ‘off’ is that the father didn’t see what happened or ask any questions to find out. What happened? Where did he hit you? How hard? Are you alright? Is my son alright? Is everyone alright? This sounds obvious but wasn’t to me until last night. Back to age. Is the age of the cyclist important? If you consider it from the perspective of a four-year-old, it might be. He’s on his bike, helmet on, speeding along, sees a gap and thinks he can get through it. He doesn’t know and/or may never have been told about the risks (to himself and others) of undertaking on the left. Hits pedestrian. I was not expecting to be hit from behind or the undertaking. But had I walked closer to the wall – and not left a potentially inviting gap – this probably wouldn’t have happened. This is just one ‘golden nugget’ I will take away. It’s something I can easily do, doesn’t depend on anyone else doing anything differently, and could contribute towards keeping myself and others safe. All in all, posting here has been unexpectedly useful for me. I hope for others, too. I feel able to move forward with learnings, so thank you guys.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...