Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A youth was stabbed there this afternoon at about 2.30pm - 3.30 pm. I was told it wasn't a fatality but the boy was treated at the scene and taken to hospital. I hope he is okay and recovering. It was a crime scene until about 10pm when the cordon was taken away. Thoughts for the boy.

If you were a kid in an area of kids with knives you'd be tempted to carry. Plenty of studies in the area. Wouldn't surprise me if the victim had a knife. Do we deport him as well?


Not saying any of it is a good thing but it needs more considered analysis and understanding beyond "deport em"


We don't have a spare Australia in 2014 in any case

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Locking people up and throwing keys away. For

> carrying something

>

> The 18th century called and wants their policy

> back. It's prepared to offer slum housing and

> scurvy in exchange



Lol.


Hope the kid is ok and the idiot who did it feels remorse eventually.


I'm a fan of The Bridge and loved the way Martin broke through Jens' protective wall to make sure he was tormented by what he'd done and finally felt remorse.


Harder to do a sentence with your guilt invading your nightmares than with a wall protecting you from your remorse.

These days the gang controlled areas end at a certain point and if another gang member passes a certain lamp post or similar, he/she is in mortal danger. The police did some early morning raids across London last week on gang-related operations and made some arrests. They are taking i seriously it seems.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These days the gang controlled areas end at a

> certain point and if another gang member passes a

> certain lamp post or similar, he/she is in mortal

> danger. The police did some early morning raids

> across London last week on gang-related

> operations and made some arrests. They are taking

> i seriously it seems.



This is the forum at its pants wetting worst. We've gone from a kid getting stabbed to full on gang warfare raging in ED...thanks stevieb23 and Unleglen. Gangs obviously exist and must be countered hard, wherever they proliferate.

But the non sequitur-fuelled ,cleavage-heaving panic mongering evidenced here , does not assist matters .

It only leads to things like the ludicrous " bullet riddled car" thread.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think it’s directly related because a major factor in so few houses actually being built despite the demand is  a) financial incentives for builders isn’t there. Longer they wait to build the more prices go up. Because too many people want prices to go up    b) nimbys. In expensive houses.  Don’t build here it will devalue my property   Because my property price has to go up 
    • Some of these things are going on for quite a while, and consistently. I'm just guessing but it seems better organised/choreographed than just a back garden shindig or kids chucking them around. Surely it's got to be wedding venues etc that are putting them on or maybe just allowing them...?
    • It is. It's just not gonna happen. London is supposed to get 440,000 new homes by 2030. Just 10,000 were completed in 2024-2025 so housing supply is barely growing. Meanwhile, housing demand continues to increase. Net migration to the UK was +204,000 in 2024-2025 (and that's a big drop from the previous year). Of those people, about 25% will come to London ie 51,000 people. The average occupancy of a home in London is 2.5 persons i.e. we should have built 21,250 new homes in London just to keep the current supply equalised with current demand. But we didn't - we built half as much. We're not even keeping things steady with new housing, let alone improving the structural long term shortage. That's not helped by NIMBYs and politicians like @James Barber opposing new housing on infill sites like the old Jewsons yard. But I don't see how people complaining about more tax on £2m homes affects any of that one way or the other. Perhaps I'm being dense. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/press/net-migration-falls-78-in-two-years-returning-to-pre-brexit-levels-every-major-immigration-category-except-asylum-declines/ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1ldgqvypqpo https://www.hbf.co.uk/news/urgent-government-action-needed-to-prevent-london-housing-delivery-collapse-warns-hbf/ https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/householdcharacteristics/homeinternetandsocialmediausage/bulletins/householdandresidentcharacteristicsenglandandwales/census2021  
    • That is true, but that short burst of intense noise can cause life-changing, long-term damage and consequences for pets and their owners. A quick internet search shows there is a developing craze for as-loud-as-possible fireworks- the emphasis is on how much of a bang they make, not on the visual aspect. What is it that people love so much about this and why do they think it is okay to impose it on everyone else? I am appalled that the government clearly have no intention of doing a thing about it. Our allegedly 'green' council should probably take a closer look. If we start having fireworks going off every night for 6 months of the year, that is going to have a variety of environmental impacts.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...