Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Actually it's the reception staff at Melbourne Grove that I feel sorry for. They are in the middle, in a no win situation, taking the flack for those in charge who have assented to and implemented this deplorable system.


The Doctors, and in particular the Doctor in charge, Simon Fradd, are fully signed up to a political experiment, this is about them saving money but at our expense. Those practice members who disagreed, like Dr Brew Graves, left, fast.


The only way to change it is for everyone to complain, in writing, to the local Health Trust, the local Practitioners Cttee, and our dear MP. Nothing less will make any difference because at the end of the day it's all about saving money.

I put in a rant of complaint via the Concordia website after yet another shocking experience with the reception staff. It was the weeks leading up to this new system and as a way of apologising Mr Fradd called me to explain the system etc and deal with my problem personally. It was then that I realised the surgery had been taken over by a private company with no concern for the patients of Melbourne Grove. I left Dr Dewji on LL when I fell pregnant cos I found him to be totally useless. I joined MG cos it was local with a good reputation. Throughout my pregnancy I wasn't able to get to see a midwife for any of my checks but this was cool cos I just booked in to see Dr Brew Graves instead. When my baby was born and he had colic and 2 fraught and dangerously on the edge parents. Penny Ackland looked after us and made life bearable by seeing us at the drop of a hat, even if the waiting room was full. In all I was so impressed with MG. From Lancashire originally where its not a miracle to get to see your GP that week, I found the service to be as good as back home. Now Dr BG has left - crying shame, and I know from direct conversations that all the other doctors are pissed off with concordia's taking over. Home doctors are hard to come by. Never mind a surgery packed to the rafters with them. I too have had many missed 'telephone consultations'. More worryingly one involving my 11 month old. Ill stick around a bit longer but its not gonna take much for me to walk.
It is the telephone consultation that is a bit of an odd idea - call me old fashioned but I do think that there is some value in the clinician actually seeing the patient who might be flushed or deathly pale, obese or anorexic. Breathlessness, say, would mean something completely different for an over or underweight patient. Not to mention the utterly humiliating experience of having to describe your symptoms in the middle of an open-plan office or Sainsbury's to a bored locum nurse. It just doesn't feel right to me.

The telephone consultation system is dangerous and places profit before correct and thorough diagnosis.


I too had a missed telephone call back (i was on another call and they left me a message, when I called back they told me I had to wait another 24 hours).


Tired of the dozy love-lorn receptionists, the locum doctors (the existing staff are really demoralised and often absent), the phone robot and the dirty clinic, this was the last straw. I calmly explained to the office manager when I called back that if noone spoke to me today I would complain to: Concordia, the local MP who is a Government Minister, the relevant DoH Minister, the local paper, the EDF, my local councillors, the PCT and anyone else who got in my way. Yes, I may have gone over the top but I was cross! They called back within 5 minutes and a Concordia customer relations person called me twice to check I was ok.


They know that most of us are too lazy or inconvinienced to change doctors but the they don't want the guinea pig telephone consultation experiment (and future incomes) damaged.

If this is such a problem then the only way to change it is to phone or write a letter of complaint. Every complaint received needs to be acknowledged and responded to, and is fed further up the chain from each practice to the PCT.


(see here for details)


I would encourage every EDFite here with a grievance to complain (preferably by writing). Try to complain about only one thing but make it very clear what that thing is - eg phone-back is at incorrect times, long cue/wait on phone etc. Above all be objective and preferably brief (you don't want to be perceived as a rambling whinger).


Having a moan on this forum is useful for garnering opinions but will do nothing to change their system.


Healthcare is something to be taken very seriously, especially trials of new systems you feel are not working to your benefit. One of the measures used to assess how successful the system is will be complaints and or satisfaction surveys. If you don't complain the system will be proven to work!

Melbourne Grove Medical Practice is rubbish. I was a patient of this practice and voted with my feet. I am aware that out of 4 GPs, 3 have either left or are leaving or are just not there! It is staffed by a bunch of bored nurses and temporary locum doctors. I think someone needs to inform the PCT because they are not aware of this problem. That's what a private company ('Concordia') can do to a previously excellent surgery.
  • 2 weeks later...
It is a total mess they have decided not to have a patient forum as they can't handle the out pouring from their patients. Southwark PCT recommend that these are held every 4-6 months but can't impose this on a private company. So we are stuck with crap surgery and no forum to express our views - great!

Hi Sue


I would very much like to move to another surgery but I have a wonderful doctor there that I feel 100% happy and relaxed with - and it has taken me 8 years since I last felt like that. If he leaves/retires I will change, but until then I have a reason to stay.

mells Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is a total mess they have decided not to have a

> patient forum as they can't handle the out pouring

> from their patients. Southwark PCT recommend that

> these are held every 4-6 months but can't impose

> this on a private company.


Can you expand on this please? There is apparently still, according to the home page (bottom RH) at http://www.mgmp.co.uk, a Patient Participation Group. Is that the one you mean? Does anyone else know anything about it?


BTW, which of them is the smiling doctor in the banner at the head of the page?

Their home page gives the impression that this still exists - do you know anyone who has been to one recently. A friend heard directly from them that they have decided to only allow patients to fill in feed back forms - a total cop out.


The pretty pics of smiling staff are organised by Fradd's nephews who are good at the PR side of things. They slightly misfired with the advertising on their new appointment cards which have a funeral director advertising on them. Really inspires confidence.


A fine old surgery going down the tubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This may be somewhat out of date but virtually no environmental benefit & almost entirely grass... really? https://www.gigl.org.uk/sinc/sobi09/ Description Peckham Rye was established as an open space in the late 19th century and includes several valuable habitat features spread across the park. The park is a Grade II Listed landscape, and has recently been restored with assistance from the Heritage Lottery Fund. A small community garden within the site is managed by the Friends of Peckham Rye. Peckham Rye Park won a Green Flag Award again for 2022. The site is used by the Southwark Health Walks project as part of a Walking the Way to Health (WHI) scheme. Wildlife This large park has several valuable habitat features. The most important of these is the only remaining above-ground section of the River Peck and the most natural stream in the borough. The stream is heavily shaded by native, unmanaged wet woodland dominated by alder, ash and pedunculated oak with a ground cover of pendulous sedge and bramble. Alder dominated woodland is a rare habitat in Southwark. Although somewhat altered with weirs, other artificial structures and ornamental planting, some sections are still in their natural banks and includes yellow flag, watercress, water figwort and cuckooflower. The largest of three ponds supports marginal vegetation including hemp agrimony. A variety of waterfowl nest on the wooded island, including tufted duck, coot, Canada goose and mallard. Substantial flocks of gulls visit the park in winter and bats are likely to forage over the water. Small blocks of predominantly native woodland, mostly on the boundary between the Park and the Common, are dominated by oak and ash with a well-developed understory, but sparse ground flora. Spring bulbs have been planted in previous years. These and several dense shrubberies support a good bird population and small numbers of pipistrelle bats are present. Infrequently mown grassland is located in one large area and was seeded in 2009. It's composition includes giant fescue, ladies bedstraw, meadowsweet, black knapweed and wild carrot. The rest of the park consists of amenity grassland with some fine mature trees.  
    • Same here. Incredibly selfish behaviour. Also illegal.
    • I heard them & our two dogs were extremely upset by it..  bad enough during the evenings but at least can have music on to dilute the noise!   Some people have literally zero thoughts for others!! 
    • I have signed that petition.  Someone was letting off loud fireworks at about 3 am this morning. They woke me up.   I don’t know where they were exactly but it sounded like they were in the vicinity of Dog Kennel Hill.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...