Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On the same note then, what is the point in the Olympics? Who cares about man's achievements - should we just not bother?


I'm sure we have gained much in terms of technology advancement as a direct result of the NASA scientists (as in deed the Russians - although I think they made do with the zero-gravity compliant pencil!).

I rather thought the idea of of science was to investigate the world around us to look for opportunities. I don't think you need to go in for these things knowing exactly what you'll get out of it.


Had the moon been made of cheese we would have had a global restructuring of the dairy market overnight.


On a macro level instead what we got were things like computers, multi-channel TV, mobile telephones, weather forecasting. A lot of materials technology that's used for everything from jet engines to that wierdo metallic foil they use after marathons wouldn't be with us were it not for international scale research. International holidays anyone?


On a micro level we've got remote communities benefiting from clean water supplies as a direct result of space technology for astronauts to drink their own wee, innumerable medical tools, lightweight spectacles and even LCD televisions. Solar energy panels (our future may depend etc..)


We even got hydroponics for Nunhead's cannabis farms. ;-)


NASA actually run a division (the Innovative Partnerships Program) whose only task is to bring space technologies to market.


If anyone's a real freak, you can enjoy publications such as Spinoff which cover space-race related technologies over the last thirty odd years.

Don't get me wrong - as a 'thing' the Moon was awe-inspiring and I love it. Been there (so to speak) got the T-shirt etc.


But on every other level it's completely ridiculous. Can you imagine an equivalent thing getting through today?


Imagine the press conference.


Folks.. we're off to the moon.

What's there?

Nothing at all - we know it to be entirely dead and lifeless. But we'll bring you back a stick of rock.

How much will it cost?

Around a hundred billion dollars.

Why are we going?

So we can get a flag on it before China do.

What happens if you're successful?

We'll go back five times and film astronauts playing golf.

How much did you say this is going to cost again?

Apparently That's strong enough logic for Bush....


'We're off to Mars'

'Why? What's there?'

'Well we've already spent $40bn and finally found water'

'Haven't we got that here?'

'Erm....'


Scientific advancement, like sporting prowess, also plays a political role by diverting the electorate away from expansionist foreign policy for a 'feel-good' factor.


I prefer having all these entrepreneurial scientific types focusing on cold fusion, terra-forming, recycling and hibernation


It's better than having them all trying to win $10m for a robotic car brain which will be installed in tanks to ensure it's only the opposition wot get moidered.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Southwark Council upgrades the public realm in Dulwich: this is disgusting favouritism for the rich! It's disgraceful!!! Southwark Council upgrades the public realm in Peckham: this is disgusting social cleansing! It's disgraceful!!! #SouthwarkDerangementSyndrome is real By the way, aficionados of prostitution and drugs will be happy to hear they remain a problem in the streets south of King's Cross station, just as they were when I lived there prior to gentrification. (To be clear: they weren't a problem because of my presence). I'm sure that will be a great relief to some of our friends on here that are scared knocking down a derelict building will turn Peckham into Royal Tunbridge Wells overnight.
    • I very much hope 'social cleansing' is not on the cards - the great value of Peckham is its rich mix of people both living and visiting the areas. If you mean removal or discouragement of criminal activity (including vandalism) then I would agree of course - and I would be very much in favour of actual cleaning in the area - the fact that Peckham is 'mixed class' is a good thing, surely (which is what 'social cleansing' often refers to). Kings Cross (which stimulated this part of the debate) had a very significant prostitution and drugs culture - with some elements of rack-renting and significant criminality. It was also far more 'run-down' and over a wider area) than the area around our station - even if that could do with more investment.
    • Yet we can. Given the development of the shopping centre, the expensive flats, lack of social hosing, closure of the stalls and hairdressers around the station to make room for the new square, I think it's quite clear where this is going.   It's not improving the area for the existing, its removal of the existing to make it better for the upgrade of the area. 
    • Week 33 fixtures...   Saturday 10th May Fulham v Everton Ipswich Town v Brentford Southampton v Manchester City Wolverhampton Wanderers v Brighton & Hove Albion AFC Bournemouth v Aston Villa   Sunday 11th May Newcastle United v Chelsea Manchester United v West Ham United Nottingham Forest v Leicester City Tottenham Hotspur v Crystal Palace Liverpool v Arsenal
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...