Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wow. A new school with even less space than Goodrich and Heber. Because we have not moved on since Victorian days. Or learnt any lessons about space or exercise. And a controversial chain gets to take over yet more education. Really quite sad about this.

Hi LondonMix,

We always said we wanted two. Sufficient parental support for two. One for East Dulwich and one targetted at Nunhead/Peckham Rye. Suspect the site they'll find will be in East Dulwich. Saldly this hasnt been a cross-part campaign. Southwark Labour have been indifferent and blanked all our requests to join in and lead with us. But at least council officials are including all these free schools in their admissions plans.

The reception school crisis is forecast to reach its worst by Stepmber 2016 with a gap of 215-235 reception places. Judith Kerr helps with 50 places (originally they were destined for Lambeth or Rotherhithe so delighted we found a local site for them), each Harris primary school provides 60 places per year, a few school expansions such as Bessemer adding 30, Belham releivng Goose Green of 30 reception places.

The obvious next problem is then secondary school places.


Hi daveybigpotatoes,

When we started this campaign two years ago we approahc a nmber of school providers. Harris came up trumps - other didnt. More recently others have shown as interest such as Dulwich Hamlet and we will continue to offer advice and support. The next big problem will be providing sufficient secondary school places. Southwark Council deny any requirement providing sufficient places for Dulwich children in Walworth, Aylesbury, Catford, New Cross.


Hi katgod,

I'm sorry it's made you feel sad.

I'd feel even sadder without the ultimate 420 children having local school places.

If you have an alternative site in mind please let us know. We think we've looked at everything in detail.

So the key will be in the design of the school and clever timetabling.

I honestly assumed that it was going to be one site and that the plan was the East Dulwich Hospital site .

Two different Harris Primaries in East Dulwich is not something I would lend my support to .

katgod Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow. A new school with even less space than

> Goodrich and Heber. Because we have not moved on

> since Victorian days. Or learnt any lessons about

> space or exercise. And a controversial chain gets

> to take over yet more education. Really quite sad

> about this.


Foxy was the first to express the unsuitability of this site for a school and got knocked back. Nothing new there.


In an age of increasing Childhood Obesity, certain vote seeking councillors seem to be in favour of building

a school with very little exercise space.


Exercise is as essential as any academic requirement.

In fact exercise has been proven to improve academic achievement.


Not a case of NIMBYism as someone suggested..


Typically Council spending money on Totem Poles. Allowing a Commercial Giant to take over every

Educational Establishment, while other school can't find the money to buy Books.


Losing the will to live..


DulwichFox

It's inner(ish) London, it's going to be hard to find a site with large open spaces for children to play and do PE. The hospital site would have been good, but unfortuately that didn't work out. So what are the realistic alternatives?

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's inner(ish) London, it's going to be hard to

> find a site with large open spaces for children to

> play and do PE. The hospital site would have been

> good, but unfortuately that didn't work out. So

> what are the realistic alternatives?



Agree. That would of been a much better site..


There are no realistic alternatives.. sadly. but making do really is not good enough.


DulwichFox.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Typically Council spending money on Totem Poles.


xxxxxx


Fox, the totem pole came out of a completely different budget - Cleaner, Greener, Safer.


The council can't use that money to fund a school.


And many people including me think it was absolutely fine to spend a relatively small amount of money on something which will really cheer up the area.

Yes Sue it's a different budget.


But .. The council has a certain amount of money and THEY decide how much money goes to each budget.


SO.. More money for schools .. Less for Totem Poles.


I have to budget my money.


No good telling the Council I cant pay my Council Tax because all my money goes into my Beer Budget.


Foxy

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you still moaning foxy? Do you have kids of

> primary age? If not, let it go man, you'll put

> yourself in an early grave with all this worrying

> about the poor mites breathing in recycled air.


I'm not moaning.. Please get off that band wagon . Just expressing my concern.


I have never been involved with anything purely out of self interest.


Early Grave.. ? At my age , I'm already on borrowed time.. :) Many of my old mates have already slipped away.


Live long.. Beer... Curry... Kebabs...


Foxy.

Not jumping on a band wagon, but you do seem absolutely determined to be negative on this thread.


I don't think this is an ideal site for a school, but a school is required, and there's not really anywhere else to put one, so yes, we must make do. There are other areas that they could concentrate on to make up for any failings of the site... Like the actual teaching and education of the children.

Hi DulwichFox,

I'm pretty certain the new school will have a regular playground and the kids will run around playing pretty much the same games I did as a kid.

The key is in clever site design and agreeing time at swimming pools and the like.


But yes if we had the option in East Dulwich of playing fields that would of course be a better alternative. Sadly we don't. Equally we can;t expand the site by buying adjacent properties. Apart from them being homes it would cost too much.


When the East Dulwich Harris Boys Academy was being planned it was descirbed by some as a Sardine Academy. They get around this by having a good sports hall, booking sessions at sports grounds. But they also go on one week sailing courses and physical activities like that. I suspect the older primary school years will get similar opportunities.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not jumping on a band wagon, but you do seem

> absolutely determined to be negative on this

> thread.

>

I don't think this is an ideal site for a school,

> but a school is required, and there's not really

> anywhere else to put one, so yes, we must make do.

> There are other areas that they could concentrate

> on to make up for any failings of the site... Like

> the actual teaching and education of the children.


Initially all I said was.


Considering the amount of traffic and the amount of accidents along

that stretch of Lordship Lane I cannot think of a more inappropriate site for a school.



Any Further comments came about from having to defend myself and views from a tirade of insults aimed at Foxy.


I really don't give a damn what they build there.. Open Prison if they want...

No.. could not be a prison as lack of exercise space would be against Prisoners Human Rights..

Kids do not have rights.. do they. ?

Get my point. ?


DF.

This might seem a stupid question but could the old Thomas Calton School at Choumert RD be re used, I think is is now used for adult education could this be moved to the smaller Police station site and the old TC site re built to a new larger grand big new school.

Bob S

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Not jumping on a band wagon, but you do seem

> > absolutely determined to be negative on this

> > thread.

> >

> I don't think this is an ideal site for a

> school,

> > but a school is required, and there's not

> really

> > anywhere else to put one, so yes, we must make

> do.

> > There are other areas that they could

> concentrate

> > on to make up for any failings of the site...

> Like

> > the actual teaching and education of the

> children.

>

> Initially all I said was.

>

> Considering the amount of traffic and the amount

> of accidents along

> that stretch of Lordship Lane I cannot think of a

> more inappropriate site for a school.

>

>

> Any Further comments came about from having to

> defend myself and views from a tirade of insults

> aimed at Foxy.

>

> I really don't give a damn what they build there..

> Open Prison if they want...

> No.. could not be a prison as lack of exercise

> space would be against Prisoners Human Rights..

> Kids do not have rights.. do they. ?

> Get my point. ?

>

> DF.



No.


Most prisoners can not be taken off site. School kids can go to local facilities.


I went to St John's when it was on Northcross / Archdale, and that was small with a little playground. We went to Dulwich baths, Crystal Palace sports centre, Peckham Rye (this was in the 80s). Talking about the kid's human rights because there won't be a massive playground is over extending.

what on earth does 'Harris came up trumps' actually mean James. My question was why have they been selected. Your answer that they won because they won isn't great. Presumably you set the policy, the selection criteria, run the selection process etc. pleas answer the question. Why is there no new Southwark BC school? Does Harris support the political parties?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...