Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://peckhamryestation.com. Here you can see:



1. The latest proposed concept design http://peckhamryestation.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/concept-design.jpg


2. The design notes that were formed as a result of the previous consultation http://peckhamryestation.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/pre-design-design-consultation-report.pdf


3. Download a form to respond to the latest concept design. Feedback must be in by JANUARY 26th. http://peckhamryestation.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/pre-design-design-consultation-report.pdf The form is not interactive so you can also address the questions in the form by email to [email protected].

I'm very much in favour of the redevelopment of the station frontage and opening of the square as a civic space.


However, perspex commercial units in the square and 6 story residential units (with no guarantee of these being affordable or social housing) seem utterly at odds with the area and the demographic. The displacement of small shops and creative studios beyond those situated within the to-be-demolished arcade in front of the station would not be welcomed.

That seems to be the common reaction. How did they get from the initial consultation to this?


As PeckhamVision asks on its twitter account:

"key Q = how does welcome plan to create #Peckham Rye station public square become full redevelopment of all land, with square just 5%?"

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That seems to be the common reaction. How did they

> get from the initial consultation to this?

>

> As PeckhamVision asks on its twitter account:

> "key Q = how does welcome plan to create #Peckham

> Rye station public square become full

> redevelopment of all land, with square just 5%?"



Perhaps someone has the sense to look to the future and not 5 minute fad in the area before it moves elsewhere.

There is clearly an underlying commercial motive here. Small artisan units are thriving perfectly well in what's already there even if it is dilapidated. The plans give a nod to more modern up to date spaces for these small indie businesses but the likely rents will quickly price them out - and the larger chains will be soon attracted. This is a kind of gradual "commercial cleansing" that the developers may have in mind as a long term strategy in order to maximise return on their investment.


This is ancient thinking and modern social planning needs to adopt newer models to promote good mixed affordable space for creative start ups and the public.


See Brixton village for a similar pressures/dynamic when it comes to rents and SME's.

"The key point is that by itself without external intervention, Peckham has been creating from within a whole set of enterprises right across the cultural and creative industries and across four linked sites in the town center. They are thriving while left alone, but heavy handed regeneration will kill them off. It is likely to be a fiasco and will kill the golden goose that has made Peckham such a hot spot in the first place."


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-michael-petry/peckham-in-peril_b_4643580.html

araucaria Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The key point is that by itself without external

> intervention, Peckham has been creating from

> within a whole set of enterprises right across the

> cultural and creative industries and across four

> linked sites in the town center. They are thriving

> while left alone, but heavy handed regeneration

> will kill them off. It is likely to be a fiasco

> and will kill the golden goose that has made

> Peckham such a hot spot in the first place."

>

> http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-michael-petry/p

> eckham-in-peril_b_4643580.html


I completely agree/ I find it very disturbing that an elected political class is so uninterested in celebrating the work of Peckham Vision/ the people living and working in Peckham and so interested in securing their own next jobs with the developers they're giving the green light


There's a ring of high rise blocks that will circle Peckham on the north being planned. The height of these blocks will completely change view lines from existing buildings and they'll change forever the real villages Peckham and Nunhead were.

A recent visit to the (fondly known as "The Itch") Peckhamplex, enough time before the film for a pint. And the boozer across the street has been downgraded into a PaddyPower!


Had to jog-trot all the way down the Rye to the high road and even then the choice was limited to one Wotherspoon's.


Sad times.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm very much in favour of the redevelopment of

> the station frontage and opening of the square as

> a civic space.

>

> However, perspex commercial units in the square

> and 6 story residential units (with no guarantee

> of these being affordable or social housing) seem

> utterly at odds with the area and the demographic.

> The displacement of small shops and creative

> studios beyond those situated within the

> to-be-demolished arcade in front of the station

> would not be welcomed.



What DC said.

Saw this tweeted today:


"Network Rail have unveiled their proposals for the redevelopment of Peckham Rye Station. They've asked for community feedback here but their feedback form is long, and not interactive. I've created an interactive version of the form that will write an email on your behalf that you can then copy, and send on."


http://chrisdowling.biz/peckham/


Deadline this weekend.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went to France recently and in the city I visited there were large billboards on the main streets urging people to stop their dogs from messing on the streets and in a little park a sign said something to the effect that this park was built for your enjoyment not as a dumping ground for dog mess. There were also big signs about not fly tipping. I wonder if councils are too worried about offending dog owners by making a fuss about this major problem. I was a dog owner for many years, got free bags from the council and there were even bins around then.
    • I was also woken by this. It happened in two bursts, which felt even more anti social.
    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...