Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://peckhamryestation.com. Here you can see:



1. The latest proposed concept design http://peckhamryestation.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/concept-design.jpg


2. The design notes that were formed as a result of the previous consultation http://peckhamryestation.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/pre-design-design-consultation-report.pdf


3. Download a form to respond to the latest concept design. Feedback must be in by JANUARY 26th. http://peckhamryestation.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/pre-design-design-consultation-report.pdf The form is not interactive so you can also address the questions in the form by email to [email protected].

I'm very much in favour of the redevelopment of the station frontage and opening of the square as a civic space.


However, perspex commercial units in the square and 6 story residential units (with no guarantee of these being affordable or social housing) seem utterly at odds with the area and the demographic. The displacement of small shops and creative studios beyond those situated within the to-be-demolished arcade in front of the station would not be welcomed.

That seems to be the common reaction. How did they get from the initial consultation to this?


As PeckhamVision asks on its twitter account:

"key Q = how does welcome plan to create #Peckham Rye station public square become full redevelopment of all land, with square just 5%?"

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That seems to be the common reaction. How did they

> get from the initial consultation to this?

>

> As PeckhamVision asks on its twitter account:

> "key Q = how does welcome plan to create #Peckham

> Rye station public square become full

> redevelopment of all land, with square just 5%?"



Perhaps someone has the sense to look to the future and not 5 minute fad in the area before it moves elsewhere.

There is clearly an underlying commercial motive here. Small artisan units are thriving perfectly well in what's already there even if it is dilapidated. The plans give a nod to more modern up to date spaces for these small indie businesses but the likely rents will quickly price them out - and the larger chains will be soon attracted. This is a kind of gradual "commercial cleansing" that the developers may have in mind as a long term strategy in order to maximise return on their investment.


This is ancient thinking and modern social planning needs to adopt newer models to promote good mixed affordable space for creative start ups and the public.


See Brixton village for a similar pressures/dynamic when it comes to rents and SME's.

"The key point is that by itself without external intervention, Peckham has been creating from within a whole set of enterprises right across the cultural and creative industries and across four linked sites in the town center. They are thriving while left alone, but heavy handed regeneration will kill them off. It is likely to be a fiasco and will kill the golden goose that has made Peckham such a hot spot in the first place."


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-michael-petry/peckham-in-peril_b_4643580.html

araucaria Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The key point is that by itself without external

> intervention, Peckham has been creating from

> within a whole set of enterprises right across the

> cultural and creative industries and across four

> linked sites in the town center. They are thriving

> while left alone, but heavy handed regeneration

> will kill them off. It is likely to be a fiasco

> and will kill the golden goose that has made

> Peckham such a hot spot in the first place."

>

> http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/dr-michael-petry/p

> eckham-in-peril_b_4643580.html


I completely agree/ I find it very disturbing that an elected political class is so uninterested in celebrating the work of Peckham Vision/ the people living and working in Peckham and so interested in securing their own next jobs with the developers they're giving the green light


There's a ring of high rise blocks that will circle Peckham on the north being planned. The height of these blocks will completely change view lines from existing buildings and they'll change forever the real villages Peckham and Nunhead were.

A recent visit to the (fondly known as "The Itch") Peckhamplex, enough time before the film for a pint. And the boozer across the street has been downgraded into a PaddyPower!


Had to jog-trot all the way down the Rye to the high road and even then the choice was limited to one Wotherspoon's.


Sad times.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm very much in favour of the redevelopment of

> the station frontage and opening of the square as

> a civic space.

>

> However, perspex commercial units in the square

> and 6 story residential units (with no guarantee

> of these being affordable or social housing) seem

> utterly at odds with the area and the demographic.

> The displacement of small shops and creative

> studios beyond those situated within the

> to-be-demolished arcade in front of the station

> would not be welcomed.



What DC said.

Saw this tweeted today:


"Network Rail have unveiled their proposals for the redevelopment of Peckham Rye Station. They've asked for community feedback here but their feedback form is long, and not interactive. I've created an interactive version of the form that will write an email on your behalf that you can then copy, and send on."


http://chrisdowling.biz/peckham/


Deadline this weekend.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi if anyone has one pm me cheers 
    • You can always check when they registered on the forum, if you are suspicious. But I recommended Aria, and it certainly wasn't my only post on here, and it was a genuine recommendation. ETA: And he didn't ask me to make it, to the best of my recollection. But even if he had, many local tradespeople ask people to post on here if they are happy with the work that has been done.
    • I am not a patient at this practice, but surely it is more sensible to have an initial  phone discussion, as often the GP wouldn't need to see someone face to face unless they actually needed to physically examine them? This then leaves the available face to face appointments for patients who need them. And if during  the phone call the GP felt you needed examining, then arrangements could be made for a face to face. If you feel your ailment is such that you will definitely need to be physically examined, can you not explain that to the receptionist?
    • Give Labour a chance, they've only been in government for a short time, and they inherited a mess! As regards the notice boards, to the best of my recollection they were originally intended as community notice boards, and certainly not for advertising local businesses (who would decide which businesses  should have the limited space on the boards, anyway?) East Dulwich may have become more gentrified since the boards were first introduced, but that surely doesn't mean they should now be completely  taken over for the benefit of  the "middle classes", to the exclusion of everybody else? As  NewWave says, surely these people have other ways to find out about groups and events of interest to them, which the "non middle classes" may not have access to, and even if they did may not be able to afford them. Several people including myself have complained to councillors about the state of the noticeboards in the past.  I think one of the issues is that they were originally maintained by local volunteers, who may have either moved out of the area or lost interest - or given up in despair when the boards were flypostered and/or vandalised. I completely  agree that the boards should be used for information about not for profit organisations in the area, but if regular maintenance can't be provided and/or they continue to be vandalised, then I think it would be better if they were removed altogether.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...